Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
22:01 Oxford to London Paddington
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 22:31:45 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[116] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[103] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[63] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[56] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[41] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
  Print  
Author Topic: Slippery rails, flooding, landslips and other issues - November 2016 (merged topic)  (Read 48616 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10168



View Profile
« Reply #105 on: November 23, 2016, 07:43:35 »

The Network Rail spokesman on BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Spotlight last night explained work to provide a new culvert is due to be finished in 2018 but admitted that until then that section of line was at risk.

He also stated that the booms used in the past had not been deployed because of health and safety considerations.  He claimed by the time they had the warning from the Environment Agency it was dark and it was decided it was not safe to have workers trying to erect them in poor light with fast flowing water.

He also stated the line would reopen a lot sooner than it had in the past because of the raising of the location cabinets above the floodwater.
Logged
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 754


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: November 23, 2016, 07:55:03 »

I note that some trains are now running as far as Tiverton Parkway.  Was there a blockage between Taunton and Tiverton Parkway preventing this until this morning?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8456



View Profile
« Reply #107 on: November 23, 2016, 08:42:50 »

I am very sorry that poor young lady had to endure such a journey.  I hope, at the very least, that she sends the whole thing to GWR (Great Western Railway) Customer Services.  The taxi driver from Plymouth needs to be identified and dealt with - what he did was unforgiveable.

Also, and this needs to be very sensitively done, the staff at Taunton need to be praised for their initiative in buying the pizzas but gently asked to bear vegetarians in mind if they need to do it again.

Let's hope the Peninsula Rail Task Force report launched yesterday in Westminster leads to some very serious investment to minimise the possibility of this happening again.  Anyone in London who thinks the problem in Devon is only the sea wall is getting a terrible reminder that it is not.  Cowley Bridge needs properly sorting, pretty much whatever it takes.
Hopefully once common sense prevails & HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) is cancelled or drastically scaled back, some of the colossal resource set aside for that white elephant can be redeployed elsewhere to resolve problems such as this.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #108 on: November 23, 2016, 09:09:10 »

That resource is borrowed money for *capital* investment. Improvements are not capital, thus the money wouldn't be available in the same way. It's something most don't understand. The works you mention would have to fight for taxpayers taxes....and the NHS is likely to have higher urgency.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #109 on: November 23, 2016, 10:03:35 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have just tweeted saying that Network Rail are on course to have the lines open at Cowley Bridge tomorrow.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3495

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #110 on: November 23, 2016, 10:36:29 »

I note that some trains are now running as far as Tiverton Parkway.  Was there a blockage between Taunton and Tiverton Parkway preventing this until this morning?

CrossCountry have been running to Tiverton the whole time. GWR (Great Western Railway) to Taunton. There isn't adequate platform and sidings at Tiverton to turn lots of trains, Taunton has its 5 platforms and also some sidings if needed to get trains out of the way.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 754


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: November 23, 2016, 10:47:06 »

CrossCountry have been running to Tiverton the whole time. GWR (Great Western Railway) to Taunton. There isn't adequate platform and sidings at Tiverton to turn lots of trains, Taunton has its 5 platforms and also some sidings if needed to get trains out of the way.
Looking at the Exeter TD messages from the last 24 hours it seems that although some services did run through to Tiverton Parkway in the morning, they were terminating at Taunton later in the day.

Even if XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) do run through to Tiverton Parkway all day today, this seems to be a change from previous occasions when GWR ran through to Tiverton with XC terminating at Taunton or Bristol.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #112 on: November 23, 2016, 11:10:45 »

CrossCountry are keeping their options open it seems. They've made no Short Term Planning (STP) or Variation (VAR) to their timetables. Westbound XCs (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) are merely terminating early at Tiverton Parkway this morning. Later services where the rolling stock is not due to work back may terminate earlier.

I'd hazard a guess that Network Rail are working their butts off at Cowley Bridge and, although they are publicly saying 'tomorrow', are hoping they may have the lines open later today.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Pb_devon
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292


View Profile
« Reply #113 on: November 23, 2016, 11:50:31 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have just tweeted saying that Network Rail are on course to have the lines open at Cowley Bridge tomorrow.

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Devon webpage report opening at 13.00 today.
Logged
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 754


View Profile
« Reply #114 on: November 23, 2016, 13:02:53 »

T3 has just been removed from E41 and E56 on the Exeter TD.  Looks like 1C79 and 1A83 are running through.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2016, 13:16:18 by Zoë » Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10168



View Profile
« Reply #115 on: November 23, 2016, 13:33:20 »

Indeed - with a 40mph speed restriction.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: November 23, 2016, 13:43:12 »

That resource is borrowed money for *capital* investment. Improvements are not capital, thus the money wouldn't be available in the same way. It's something most don't understand. The works you mention would have to fight for taxpayers taxes....and the NHS is likely to have higher urgency.

And even if the entire HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) budget was made available that only equates to about £4-5bn per year.  I'm not going to pretend that wouldn't make a difference, but there would be all sorts of pulls on that money each year - capacity increases, new stations and routes, as well as trying to weather proof loads of locations around the country.  It might be quite some time (late 2020s?) before all these flooding issues could have enough money thrown at them from the HS2 fund.

I expect when the floods subside they'll be loads of talk and little action. Again.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #117 on: November 23, 2016, 14:05:18 »

If the damage took weeks to repair each time, the priority might be higher....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #118 on: November 23, 2016, 14:19:36 »

Certainly it would appear that raising the equipment cabinets reduced the closure time and cost of repairs so that when the floods waters had subsided it was just a case of repairing/relaying ballast that had been displaced.

I'll be interested to see what effect the equipment raising at Hinksey and Maidenhead has over the coming years - Hinksey of course also had the track level raised.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 849


View Profile
« Reply #119 on: November 23, 2016, 14:36:53 »

A question...would the signalling configuration permit temporary stabling at the Tiverton Junction loops so that all timetabled services could call at Tiverton Parkway? And even if this was possible would there be any gain from so doing?

And to repeat a previous assertion of mine - the situation at Cowley Bridge could be significantly improved by replacing the existing A377 embankment, which blocks nearly 70% of the Exe / Creedy floodplain width, with an elevated roadway. This would stop so much of the wet stuff being diverted onto the railway. It would also tie in quite nicely with the large amount of work currently being done by the EA to mitigate the flood risk further south.


 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page