Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
- US lays out plans to hit Chinese ships with port fees
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:31 Truro to Falmouth Docks
06:52 Par to Newquay
07:15 Falmouth Docks to Truro
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 02:56:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: DfT - "Cause For Concern About FGW^s Performance"  (Read 5703 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: February 13, 2008, 02:35:16 »

Letter from the DfT» (Department for Transport - about), which MTLS (More Train Less Strain) claim means that FGW (First Great Western) are under 'special measures' (link below.)
http://mtls.org.uk/node/49
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
12hoursunday
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2008, 14:51:31 »

Letter from the DfT» (Department for Transport - about), which MTLS (More Train Less Strain) claim means that FGW (First Great Western) are under 'special measures' (link below.)
http://mtls.org.uk/node/49


Just a load of MTLS spin



Quote
The Department For Transport has confirmed FGW is a failing company and is being monitored regularly . In a letter to MTLS they have written "On the basis of the information we have available, there is cause for concern about FGW^s performance and we are discussing this with FGW currently. The Department for Transport (DfT) continues to look for further improvements to FGW^s performance to match the significant improvements seen elsewhere in the rail industry.Nowt on the Department of Transport website re this

" In line with all other train Operating Companies, FGW has a Joint Improvement Plan in place, progress against which is monitored four-weekly through the Performance Delivery Group (^PDG^), which is regularly attended by Transport Ministers. FGW is currently developing a detailed recovery plan addressing cancellation issues specifically.Like it says ALL Train Operating Companies called up monthly

"Ministers and senior officials continue to emphasise the importance of improved performance to FGW at a senior level. FGW have assured Ministers that they are working hard to improve the performance of train services. The department will, of course, continue to monitor performance of the FGW franchise to ensure that commitments given to Ministers and the public are met and that further improvement to the service is provided to passengers in future."

Thanks to pressure from the public, the DfT at last understand that they must pay closer attention to the FGW franchise. Now more than ever, it is vital to continue to report cancellations and other service failures to MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context)'s and the DfT. If First continues to fail to provide an acceptable service at a fair price they must go. The time for excuses, and apologies is long over.

Figures from a national passenger survey recently released by Passenger Focus indicated that FGW has the lowest satisfaction ratings of any train company in the UK (United Kingdom). FGW punctuallity dropped to an all time low on 64% of some of their routes in December.
A recent survey by the Bristol Evening Post that compared fares into London from similar distances as Bristol found FGW fares to be between two and three times those of comparable companies.Nothing new here also Train fares have been the highest in europe for 20 years or more

The MTLS group are now starting to clutch at the preverbal straws. Heard hardly nothing from any of them in the weeks since the failed fare strike and more confirmed news like this http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1670.0 is bound to silence them further. R.I.P MTLS! Cheesy
Logged
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2008, 15:48:30 »

Quote
The MTLS (More Train Less Strain) group are now starting to clutch at the preverbal straws. Heard hardly nothing from any of them in the weeks since the failed fare strike and more confirmed news like this http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1670.0 is bound to silence them further. R.I.P MTLS! Cheesy

So, First were planning all this stock improvement as far back as 2005 then, without letting on at all. Clever that. So all we had to do was sit back and wait and all the letters, blogs, complaint forms, petitions etc were a complete waste of effort. Bummer.

Bet Dom Joly isn't going to be too happy having wasted a journey to BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI) but BTM is a commonly used alternative)).
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2008, 16:36:53 »

I think the fare strike might have encouraged FGW (First Great Western) to get more stock.  Roll Eyes

BUT- Andrew Haines sent an email to me saying that he can't make an announcement about rolling stock yet.  Sad
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page