Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:48:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Derailment of empty passenger train at Paddington causes major disruption - 16 June 2016  (Read 53480 times)
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #105 on: June 18, 2016, 11:08:15 »

Thanks for the thanks.  Embarrassed

It was indeed something of a challenge - but not perhaps as much of a challenge as fixing the physical damage caused by the incident itself.  Wink Cheesy Grin

Thanks to you and Graham for the task of separating the thread.   Appreciate that the longer a double thread or incorrect thread goes on, the worse it is to merge.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8451



View Profile
« Reply #106 on: June 18, 2016, 20:51:54 »

It would be interesting to know what GWR (Great Western Railway) propose offering to their season ticket holders in terms of compensation via void days etc in terms of disruption over the last few days.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #107 on: June 18, 2016, 21:08:10 »

I see form NR» (Network Rail - home page) tweets that the offending train has now been re-railed and removed to Old Oak Common

https://twitter.com/networkrailwest/status/744240821747200001

https://twitter.com/networkrailwest/status/744242174670290944

Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #108 on: June 18, 2016, 22:29:24 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Derailed London Paddington train is finally moved


Network Rail said engineers would carry on working at the site following the incident.

A train that has been stuck on the line at Paddington since Thursday evening causing disruption has been moved, Network Rail have said.

The empty train was automatically derailed after passing a red signal outside Paddington.

Although the train has been shifted, engineers will continue to work on the site throughout the night to repair damage to the line, Network Rail said.

A damaged gantry which the train crashed into was removed earlier.

Platforms one to five remain closed at Paddington, and in total Network Rail has so far deployed 50 engineers to work on the incident.

Network Rail had originally hoped to remove the train at about 22:00 BST on Friday.


The two carriages have been separated and are being placed on the track one at a time


The damaged gantry which has hit by the train when it derailed was removed earlier this morning

A Network Rail spokesperson said earlier that work would be ongoing throughout Saturday now that the "complicated" work to clear electric power cables had been completed.

With the train lifted clear, the track will be inspected for damage and the electrical cabling will be reconnected, he said.

No timescale has been given for when a full service will be running again.


The derailed train has severely disrupted services into and out of the station


Engineers are using a jack to lift the train and move it back on the track

Great Western Railway have advised passengers to "travel only if necessary and arrive in plenty of time", although a limited service is running.

The derailment has been referred to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch to investigate why the driver passed a red signal.

Network Rail has said it will "await the conclusion of the official investigation" before commenting on the cause of the crash.


Engineers said clearing the electric power cables safely was "the tricky bit"


Electric power cables will be reconnected after the track is inspected for damage

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8451



View Profile
« Reply #109 on: June 18, 2016, 22:58:40 »

Network Rails comments re: "awaiting the outcome of the investigation" are interesting bearing in mind that they have already broadcast the fact that it was caused by driver error in passing a red signal!
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7371


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: June 18, 2016, 23:10:46 »

Network Rails comments re: "awaiting the outcome of the investigation" are interesting bearing in mind that they have already broadcast the fact that it was caused by driver error in passing a red signal!

That "cause" only explains why there was an accident on that occasion. It does not explain the amount of damage, and hence of disruption, nor what led the driver to do that, how likely it was, and what would make it less likely in the future. Those will be the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch)'s concern, but NR» (Network Rail - home page) will be providing much of the information for their investigation.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #111 on: June 18, 2016, 23:15:16 »

Meanwhile,

Quote
No timescale has been given for when a full service will be running again.

 Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8451



View Profile
« Reply #112 on: June 19, 2016, 06:28:24 »

Meanwhile,

Quote
No timescale has been given for when a full service will be running again.

 Roll Eyes
.....an element of normality has returned today to be fair.......lots of cancellations due to staff shortages and "more trains than usual  needing repairs at the same time"........
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #113 on: June 19, 2016, 06:41:24 »

.....an element of normality has returned today to be fair.......lots of cancellations due to staff shortages and "more trains than usual  needing repairs at the same time"........

Lots of Heathrow cancellations, but they don't show up on our top-of-page feeds or JourneyCheck.  And a least one train will be in for unplanned repair due to running off the catch points and being stopped abruptly by the pole for the electrics. 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3490

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #114 on: June 19, 2016, 07:51:20 »

The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) have a video of the rerailing here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36569006
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #115 on: June 19, 2016, 08:21:34 »


It is interesting to see that the lifting gear looks the same as the stuff I was trained on as an apprentice at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) .............. errrrrrrrrrrrr 4 decades ago  Shocked   Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #116 on: June 19, 2016, 12:31:04 »

Presumably the new electrification structure will have to go in the same place as the damaged one, since to do otherwise would require redesign.
That would seem to allow a small but real risk of a repeat incident and consequent substantial disruption.

Would it be worth installing a barrier to stop any derailed train before it strikes the mast ? perhaps something cheap  and simple like a pile of sand bags.
Running into a pile of sand bags would stop the train quickly, but NOT as abruptly as striking a steel structure, the risk to the driver would be reduced.

Worth considering not just at the site of this mishap, but at any other vulnerable locations ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: June 19, 2016, 12:46:26 »

Presumably the new electrification structure will have to go in the same place as the damaged one, since to do otherwise would require redesign.
That would seem to allow a small but real risk of a repeat incident and consequent substantial disruption.

Would it be worth installing a barrier to stop any derailed train before it strikes the mast ? perhaps something cheap  and simple like a pile of sand bags.
Running into a pile of sand bags would stop the train quickly, but NOT as abruptly as striking a steel structure, the risk to the driver would be reduced.

Worth considering not just at the site of this mishap, but at any other vulnerable locations ?

It will need to go roughly in the same place. 

Also you have to be careful of not engineering to the what if , SandTEngineer has already posted that he believes that the structure is beyond the limit for catch point run through.

We need to wait for the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) report as to the cause as their recommendations will guide future designs and risk assessments also if operating, maintenance, training etc process need to be changed
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #118 on: June 19, 2016, 19:31:39 »

I am trying to plan my journey from Reading to Blackfriers tomorrow and need to be there for 9am - anyone have any indications as to how services will be running in the morning or is it wait and see?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8451



View Profile
« Reply #119 on: June 19, 2016, 19:37:00 »

Have you tried tweeting GWR (Great Western Railway)?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page