Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Liskeard to Looe
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
14:22 Looe to Liskeard
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:18 Paignton to Exmouth
14:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 13:37:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 16
  Print  
Author Topic: Avocet Line - Exeter to Exmouth - incidents and events; services, stock and related improvements  (Read 148685 times)
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: November 28, 2009, 12:50:34 »

It is half hourly, isn't it?

Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #76 on: November 28, 2009, 20:03:37 »

It is half hourly, isn't it?



Yep  Huh
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: November 28, 2009, 22:09:40 »

Yes  you were right i put the wrong time interval it should of been 15 mins not 30.
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: November 28, 2009, 23:34:57 »

Yes  you were right i put the wrong time interval it should of been 15 mins not 30.

And you can't spell 'Avocet (Branch line from Exeter to Exmouth)'...
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #79 on: November 29, 2009, 09:41:44 »

it would appear that i am not the only one with spelling difficultys (spot the mistake's Cheesy Grin)

anyway this line is an interesting one... apart from leading upto digby and between there and topsham... i dont belive there is alot of space for double track, the cheapest way to improve frequency and improve capacity would be to build a second platform at digby leave timings as they are but have one unit running between digby and central
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #80 on: November 29, 2009, 10:21:50 »

There isn't the demand from Digby. A lot of the trains arrive into Digby full anyway. What is needed is to ensure that trains are not operated by lone pacers as they get packed. I travelled on a 143 on it's own twice  yesterday and both times it was standing in the isles.
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #81 on: November 29, 2009, 10:36:29 »

There isn't the demand from Digby. A lot of the trains arrive into Digby full anyway. What is needed is to ensure that trains are not operated by lone pacers as they get packed. I travelled on a 143 on it's own twice  yesterday and both times it was standing in the isles.

im sorry mate but your incorrect there is a demand at digby look at the growth in passenger numbers,almost every time ive been there the platform has been packed! dont get me wrong it has its quiet times but it is a busy station and has so much potential! adding a shuttle service between central and digby would relive conjestion on the whole line nearly a quater of a million people used the station last year 1 100% rise in 6 years where as exmouth had a drop in users of over 100 thousand, the ideal situation would be to double all or most of the whole line provide bigger trains higher frequency , just isnt going to happen however duel upto digby and one extra unit is possible
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #82 on: November 29, 2009, 12:06:59 »

These units would be far better utilised either making sure all trains are 4/3 carriages, or otherwise using them between Paignton and Exeter to provide a half hourly stopping service.

Taking an off peak example: 15 people roughly boarded yesterdays 13.40 Digby - Exeter, which was full & standing before arriving. Had there been a 15 minute service there would be lots of empty seats in the so called shuttle trains.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 880


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: November 29, 2009, 12:46:37 »

Using the official figures published by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) , it is clear that overall passenger number growth on the 'Avocet (Branch line from Exeter to Exmouth) Line' (it would btw be nice if admin could change the title of this thread!) is very positive;for the period 2003-2008 the percentage increase was a staggering 15.7% if Exeter Central is excluded or a slightly more sensible, but still pretty impressive, 7.1% if EXC is factored in. Most of the growth has been fuelled by Topsham (67.1K , 63.5%) and Digby & Sowton (127K , 105.3%), the latter location being the railhead for a short walk/cycle to the Sandy Park Stadium home of Exeter Chiefs Rugby Club, who are now actively promoting the use of the train for getting to matches, and the centre of a major residential development.
Although accepting that usage at Exmouth has declined (-5.4%) over the last 5 years, this raw statistic ignores the fact that nearly 700K passengers are still using the station; it is widely acknowledged that the 'parallel' A376 road is already running at full capacity and, because of the terrain, opportunities for further enhancements are very limited.
The line is now also promoted by the Avocet Line Rail Users Group(ALRUG) - http://sites.google.com/site/theavocetline/home - who hold regular meetings often involving Network Rail, FGW (First Great Western) and the various local authorities.
New stations are planned for Newcourt (on the site of the old RN stores depot) between Digby and Topsham, and Monkerton between Digby and Polsloe Bridge. These additions can apparently only be achieved by re-doubling of the line from Exmouth Junction to at least Digby, and preferably Topsham, and the provision of a new passing loop at Lympstone. This would also permit the ALRUG aspiration of a 4 trains/hour service, although I personally believe that 3 TPH (trains per hour) would be adequate.
At the moment I live in hope rather than expectation! 
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: November 29, 2009, 13:34:44 »

Would it possible to have a links page where links to websites such as the one quoted in in the previous post could be placed? I think that would be a really useful service.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19550



View Profile Email
« Reply #85 on: November 29, 2009, 13:36:00 »

... (it would btw be nice if admin could change the title of this thread!) ...

Done!  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19550



View Profile Email
« Reply #86 on: November 29, 2009, 13:38:38 »

Would it possible to have a links page where links to websites such as the one quoted in in the previous post could be placed? I think that would be a really useful service.

Good idea, John!  I'll see what we can do, this afternoon.  C.   Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: November 29, 2009, 13:44:06 »

Blimey, that's quick! Thanks Chris.
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: November 29, 2009, 14:07:26 »

thanks for changing the thread subject
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: November 29, 2009, 19:07:16 »

I would have thought that more carriages on the existing services would be sufficient, such as 6/8 at peak time.  (Of course, this assuming a World with unlimited working units...  Wink)
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 16
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page