vacman
|
|
« Reply #60 on: August 29, 2009, 20:17:56 » |
|
Nothin wrong with 142's, workhorses! we should show them more appreciation as we'd have been in the sh1t without them!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
|
|
« Reply #61 on: August 29, 2009, 23:53:41 » |
|
ive noticed guards seem to prefer working 142's to sprinters must be less hassle from there point of view! i dont hate them there decent little units i just wish they would keep them off the barny route! exmouth to paignton if fine! what they were made for!! noone goes all the way on that route well harldy anyone infact it may aswell be two sepperate services when you look at how people use the service with esd being the split plus the sea wall route had good views from a donkey!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #62 on: August 30, 2009, 00:13:55 » |
|
I'm sure the guards will disagree
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gaf71
|
|
« Reply #63 on: August 30, 2009, 12:47:01 » |
|
I'm sure the guards will disagree i disagree
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #64 on: August 30, 2009, 18:43:26 » |
|
I disagree... give me 150s with intermediate door controls anyday.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #65 on: August 30, 2009, 18:45:50 » |
|
Even the newbies don't like them
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #67 on: August 31, 2009, 11:11:20 » |
|
Even the newbies don't like them To be fair they aren't that bad, it's just revenue is hard when you've got to run back to an end to do doors - especially Exmouth branch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
|
|
« Reply #68 on: August 31, 2009, 12:54:52 » |
|
Even the newbies don't like them To be fair they aren't that bad, it's just revenue is hard when you've got to run back to an end to do doors - especially Exmouth branch. thats why the penalty fair needs to be enforced i hate seeing people sneek on knoewing there is a chance they dont have to pay only needs a group of them between stations and its impossible to check everyones
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
|
« Reply #69 on: September 01, 2009, 15:25:15 » |
|
I notice that the Great Western Rail Utilisation Document, already mentioned on another thread, considers an half-hourly Exmouth-Paignton. Could this work without slowing down the 'high speed' services ?
Unless it means that more stations will have selected stopping patterns.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #70 on: September 01, 2009, 16:22:56 » |
|
I notice that the Great Western Rail Utilisation Document, already mentioned on another thread, considers an half-hourly Exmouth-Paignton. Could this work without slowing down the 'high speed' services ?
Unless it means that more stations will have selected stopping patterns.
Some will be running in the ex SWT▸ paths I should imagine, and some others apparently will not run beyond Newton Abbot in the hours when XC▸ run through. I suppose it is all possible as they don't seem to mention any major issues. By the way, the RUS▸ explicitly mentions that DfT» have instructed FGW▸ to provide more services vice SWT, and seems to confirm the second LHCS▸ set as someone posted recently. Couldn't see anything about replacing SWT calls at the likes of Ivybridge though... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RichardB
|
|
« Reply #71 on: September 01, 2009, 17:24:39 » |
|
Paul, from December, FGW▸ wil be pretty much replacing the ex SWT▸ services like-for-like, including Ivybridge stops, even the Saturday down, Sunday up Exeter - Penzance service.
Richard Burningham, Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #72 on: September 01, 2009, 17:50:57 » |
|
devon_metro and his "train tree" to the rescue it seems FGW▸ obviously are in possession of one
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #73 on: September 01, 2009, 18:23:54 » |
|
Paul, from December, FGW▸ wil be pretty much replacing the ex SWT▸ services like-for-like, including Ivybridge stops, even the Saturday down, Sunday up Exeter - Penzance service.
That seems fair, and what I always expected somehow, based on the view from SWT-land, and having read all the FGW and SWT franchise stuff over the last few years. There's been a few doubters here who reckoned it wouldn't happen though... Are these all actual services, or additional calls in other existing services though? I'm sure people would be happy to hear more details if you have them... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|