Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:15 07 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
7th Jan (1957)
Closure of Upwey Wishing Well Halt (link)

Train RunningDelayed
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 07, 2025, 02:21:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] senior railcard
[59] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Coastal walks - station to station
[49] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[34] Mining in Cornwall
[25] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16
  Print  
Author Topic: Avocet Line - Exeter to Exmouth - incidents and events; services, stock and related improvements  (Read 144934 times)
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2009, 14:56:58 »

Yes that may be one way of solving the problem.

But far as I am aware more choaches you have the higher the cost of running the services. I might be wrong.

I still like to see the station upgraded.

I would expect the 15 minute service to run only at peak times.

It would be nice if the newer rolling stock like 159 which are three car units
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #91 on: November 30, 2009, 16:00:51 »

Yes that may be one way of solving the problem.

But far as I am aware more choaches you have the higher the cost of running the services. I might be wrong.

I still like to see the station upgraded.

I would expect the 15 minute service to run only at peak times.

It would be nice if the newer rolling stock like 159 which are three car units

Cheaper to run a 4 car train than 2 2 car trains.

1 x 4 car train offers the following benefits:
*Lower track access charges etc
*Half the number of crew involved
*Back up in case of unit failure
*Not to mention the fact that a 4 car can mop up a crowded platform instead of a 2 car only taking half.
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #92 on: November 30, 2009, 17:20:46 »

I can't see them allowing anything new down here. Here is some I found


I found plenty of three car units

3 Car Units
159,165,166,168,172/2 or 172/3,175/1, 185


4 Car units
168,171/8,185


Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #93 on: February 13, 2010, 16:40:36 »

When are we going to get some newer rolling stock. The Two car 142 can't cope with the number of passengers.
Logged
marky7890
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 149


View Profile Email
« Reply #94 on: February 13, 2010, 17:10:43 »

This year we are should be getting a load of 150s once London Midland receive their new Class 172s. However I think the hired Arriva 150s and Northern Rail 142s will be handed back, so no extra capacity.

Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: February 13, 2010, 17:24:00 »

There is the slight benefit of a 150 having more room than a 142, otherwise we will continue to suffer at the hands of short formed trains.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43053



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #96 on: February 13, 2010, 17:31:32 »

The word is that it's broadly a replacement of a certain number of carriages by a very similar number.  I note that the outgoing and incoming deals are on different contracts, and should one of them fall through we could have a very interesting scenario. Starting with "take every train that's capable of being cut into sections, and cut it into sections ...."
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
marky7890
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 149


View Profile Email
« Reply #97 on: February 13, 2010, 17:46:19 »

Starting with "take every train that's capable of being cut into sections, and cut it into sections ...."

Like the 3 car 158s being shortened to 2 car ones ... again?
Logged
Branch Line Connor
Full Member
***
Posts: 76


View Profile Email
« Reply #98 on: February 13, 2010, 18:30:24 »

Its not nice being crushed onto a little pacer, that bounces around everywhere, in boiling heat! 'Im sorry to announce this service has been reported as full and standing'
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: February 13, 2010, 20:33:34 »

The train I was on this morning was only two car 142 and people had to stand.

On the way home it was a 142 and  153
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #100 on: February 13, 2010, 20:37:02 »

Like the 3 car 158s being shortened to 2 car ones ... again?
Yep something like that though FGW (First Great Western)/Dft would never get away with it now because even 3 car 158s are rammed at times. The local media would have a field day.

What a shame the order for 4 carriage 172s or something like them was cancelled because of electrification that is some years off which means a long wait before more diesel rolling stock can be cascaded down to the Cardiff-Portsmouth line from the Thames area. Can't say I am looking forward to 165/166s replacing the 158s that operated on this line which are good trains IMHO (in my humble opinion) Sad

Mind you, knowing how much Dft/government change their minds regarding all things rail, who knows what we might end up rolling stock wise over the next few years.

Logged
The Grecian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 176


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: February 14, 2010, 12:02:55 »

The 150s were probably the best units for the Avocet (Branch line from Exeter to Exmouth) line as they had more doors than the 158s so could load and unload quicker, keeping to time.
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: February 14, 2010, 13:40:59 »

The 150s were probably the best units for the Avocet (Branch line from Exeter to Exmouth) line as they had more doors than the 158s so could load and unload quicker, keeping to time.

Definately... and has been noted a 150 will fit more people than a 142.

However, I thought the new 172s were already delayed which could make things interesting if the Arriva & Northern stock has to go.
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #103 on: February 14, 2010, 13:53:55 »

172001 is currently being tested at Derby
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 848


View Profile
« Reply #104 on: March 21, 2010, 07:58:49 »

Exeter City Council, and partners, have commenced formal consultation on the proposed new development in the Newcourt area of the city.

More information is available at http://www.exeter.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=12378&detailid=12384

The good news is that there is an absolute commitment to the provision of a public transport 'hub' in the centre of the site which will include a railway station on the Exeter-Exmouth 'Avocet (Branch line from Exeter to Exmouth)' branch line.

The intention seems to be to try and provide the enhanced rail service without much in the way of infrastructure improvements; personally I think that the Topsham loop should be extended as far north as possible, and preferably all the way to Exmouth Junction, to give the greatest operational flexibility.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page