Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:55 20 Apr 2025
 
- Oldest serving US astronaut returns to Earth on 70th birthday
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
08:58 Bristol Parkway to Swansea
09:05 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
09:35 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
09:55 Bristol Parkway to London Paddington
10:05 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
10:49 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
12:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
15:09 Liskeard to Looe
15:29 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
15:40 Plymouth to Penzance
15:41 Looe to Liskeard
16:35 Par to Newquay
17:00 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:09 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
17:16 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
17:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
17:37 London Paddington to Swansea
17:48 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
17:55 Newquay to Par
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
18:15 Penzance to Plymouth
18:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
20:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:11 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
22:45 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
23:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Weston-Super-Mare
23:49 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
Additional 07:45 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:59 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:47 Penzance to Cardiff Central
09:22 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth Harbour
10:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
10:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
10:55 Cardiff Central to Penzance
10:57 Paignton to Exmouth
11:41 Swindon to Weymouth
11:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
12:26 Exmouth to Paignton
13:16 Taunton to Cardiff Central
14:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
15:35 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
16:18 Penzance to London Paddington
16:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:00 London Paddington to Penzance
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:57 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2025, 08:13:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[90] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[84] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[83] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[63] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[56] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[55] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
  Print  
Author Topic: Fill in 3rd rail?  (Read 91261 times)
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1283


View Profile Email
« Reply #45 on: July 05, 2016, 18:15:03 »

It sounds like a good idea, and really probably needs it, but FGW (First Great Western) are a diesel railway (and shortly overhead electric) so I cannot see them leasing yet another type of traction to cater for the North Downs.

They wouldn't need to - 387s can work from either overhead or third rail, and according to a posting at Another Place, the GWR (Great Western Railway) 387s are no exception:

Quote from: A
Quote from: B
It also appears to have collector shoe beams (but no collector shoes) on the front bogie. Is this a standard fitting for the 387s as they won't be needed on the GWML (Great Western Main Line)?
If the shoes are in the raised position they won't be easily visible at a quick glance, especially from a mainly front view.   Keeps them identical to the other 29 units.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43853



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #46 on: November 30, 2016, 16:56:32 »

"North Downs railway line to be fully electrified" says Eagle Radio

Quote
Rail travel for more than 5.5 million people is about to get better - as the North Downs Line gets fully electrified.
The train line which runs between Reading and Gatwick through Surrey is being upgraded - and there's good news for Guildford because of it.

Surrey County Council hopes there will be more frequent trains, longer platforms and greater capacity at Guildford station.

More than 5.5 million passengers used the route last year and almost 300,000 jobs lie within around a mile of the line.
Now the final 29 miles of the route are being electrified.

The council says it will generate an additional £89m a year in corporation tax and an extra £97m annually in income tax.
The figures were calculated for four local enterprise partnerships including Enterprise M3 looking at the benefits of improving transport in the South East.

It follows Surrey County Council’s Cabinet Member for Environment and Planning Mike Goodman telling a conference organised by Great Western Railway that upgrading the final two sections would create around 8,000 jobs and stimulate £1.9 billion of economic growth.

That led to the council and the rail franchise joining forces to drive forward the case for investment.
Mr Goodman said: “It was great to hear the Chancellor signalling the government’s intent to invest in rail, especially as economic growth and development along the North Downs Line are being limited by creaking infrastructure and slow journeys.

“Fully electrifying this line would change all that, giving Surrey and the South East’s powerhouse economies a significant shot in the arm while also providing the government with an enormous financial boost so I hope it features in their plans.”

Timescale and method not mentioned in article.

How many diesel multiple units will be released for cascade as a result?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #47 on: November 30, 2016, 17:28:48 »

"about to get better"?

Usung the wortd "about" implies now or in the short term. Icannot see any hope of this happening just yet and many people will be disappointed by the use of this word.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: November 30, 2016, 17:29:41 »

I think this is the source; I therefore think the above story is a misinterpretation.
https://news.surreycc.gov.uk/2016/11/25/upgrading-north-downs-line-will-boost-government-coffers-by-almost-190m/
It isn't a report of a decision as far as I can see, it's still only Surrey CC pushing an agenda, as they did a few months ago.

Paul
« Last Edit: November 30, 2016, 17:49:15 by paul7755 » Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #49 on: November 30, 2016, 18:23:27 »

Quote
How many diesel multiple units will be released for cascade as a result?

If it went ahead then 9-10 units

(think a pig just flew past)
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: November 30, 2016, 18:29:09 »

Quote
How many diesel multiple units will be released for cascade as a result?

If it went ahead then 9-10 units

(think a pig just flew past)


Does that allow for the forthcoming upgrade to 3 tph Reading to Redhill, (supposedly still due with SLC2 in May 2017), or is that the current requirement?

Paul
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: November 30, 2016, 18:31:29 »

That's with the enhanced service, currently 7 units are diagrammed at the mo.

Although I'm guessing more 387s or equivalent would be required.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: November 30, 2016, 18:50:00 »

That's with the enhanced service, currently 7 units are diagrammed at the mo.

Cheers.   Will be interesting to see if the May change is going to be possible, has anyone heard anything?

Paul
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: November 30, 2016, 19:54:54 »

That's with the enhanced service, currently 7 units are diagrammed at the mo.

Cheers.   Will be interesting to see if the May change is going to be possible, has anyone heard anything?

Paul

If anyone's at Paddington tomorrow, and happens to see a manager they could ask ...
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19554



View Profile Email
« Reply #54 on: November 30, 2016, 21:36:25 »

Will be interesting to see if the May change is going to be possible, has anyone heard anything?

I thought we had the May change, back in mid-July?


Oh, sorry: I see what you meant.  Tongue

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: November 30, 2016, 23:26:11 »

I thought we had the May change, back in mid-July?

Oh, sorry: I see what you meant.  Tongue

Sidesplitting noises heard...
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19554



View Profile Email
« Reply #56 on: November 30, 2016, 23:32:41 »

Yes, sorry, Paul.  Tongue

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: December 01, 2016, 11:27:12 »

could this be done quickly and result in release of much needed DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) sooner than if we have to wait for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to sort out the OHL (Over-Head Line) on the mainline?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: December 01, 2016, 11:38:28 »

could this be done quickly and result in release of much needed DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) sooner than if we have to wait for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to sort out the OHL (Over-Head Line) on the mainline?

The title of this thread notwithstanding, I think the general view is that no more third rail will be installed (other than very short lengths in existing areas).   This route, albeit in two separate parts, is not considered a short length.   

Paul
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 580


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: December 01, 2016, 12:11:00 »

Radio station has undoubtedly misunderstood. Surrey CC want the North Downs electrified, the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) say that H&S (Health and Safety) legislation basically makes new installations compliance with H&S legislation near impossible/unaffordable apart from in some very specific urban applications e.g. London Underground extensions.

Remember that we are in the run up to Network Rail's next 5 year plan being decided, so there is doubtless all sorts of political horse-trading, strong-arming and other shennanigans going on, particularly as most local authorities seem to now have woken up to the fact that commuter railways are a vote-winner and economy booster, rather than an irritation that mess up their grand visions for highways and buses.

I just posted in another thread, but it would appear from gossip on WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) that there is currently a 319 in works having a diesel engine fitted underneath as an experiment (apparently the underframe has enough space and strength to fit one on a raft). No-one will admit to who it is for, though Northern was ruled out. TPE (Trans Pennine Express) might want one for Windemere, but the fact that they'll only have one or two engines in a 4 car unit probably rules out anywhere too hilly.

So it occurred to me that they might be destined for the North Downs and perhaps Didcot to Oxford. 3rd rail and 25kV capable, right sort of doors, Reading depot can handle both DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) and EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) stock, could presumably be turned around with minimal type-approval required, and if they can do them quickly, would enable Turbos to be cascaded west.

Anyway, just a thought...   
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page