Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 21:50:04 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Fire at Vauxhall Station  (Read 12292 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« on: May 05, 2016, 11:18:53 »

The wooden platform section; 4 out of 8 lines closed into / out of Waterloo

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36210107

Quote
The blaze broke out in signalling cables underneath one of the platforms at about 02:35 BST.

Clapham Junction station was also temporarily evacuated and shut due to overcrowding.

South West Trains says services are being severely disrupted and has urged passengers only to travel if "absolutely necessary".

Services to and from Waterloo are severely delayed and the bus station at Vauxhall has also been closed.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2016, 12:31:05 »

Apparently the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) are reporting the immediate effect, but it's not the cause.   Reports elsewhere said that sparks from a rail grinder set fire to rubbish under the platform, and the onboard crew attempted to damp it down unsuccessfully.

Perhaps there'll now be a different risk assessment for grinding alongside open wooden platforms...

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13029


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2016, 12:36:00 »

Perhaps NR» (Network Rail - home page) might do some proper track maintenance, by clearing trackside rubbish more frequently.. Fat chance.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2016, 13:07:42 »

Rubbish under the platform, if that's the actual cause, is horribly reminiscent of Kings Cross.  Sad
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2016, 13:19:35 »

Rubbish under the platform, if that's the actual cause, is horribly reminiscent of Kings Cross.  Sad

Somewhat, but a fire out in the open is most unlikely to kill anyone since escape is easy and smoke can not build up.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1264


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2016, 13:26:20 »

Harsh but...

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/commuters-delighted-at-train-delays-for-actual-reason-20160505108588

Quote
LONDON commuters delayed for hours by a fire on the tracks at Vauxhall are thrilled that there is a genuine reason for once.

The fire in signalling cables beneath the tracks has left thousands happily stranded while marvelling at the clear operation of cause and effect for the first time in living memory.

Recruitment consultant Carolyn Ryan said: ^A fire! A real one, with smoke and everything!

^It^s almost a privilege to be delayed by that, instead of unspecified staffing problems or a sudden, mysterious shortage of platforms.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2016, 14:42:33 »

Apparently the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) are reporting the immediate effect, but it's not the cause.   Reports elsewhere said that sparks from a rail grinder set fire to rubbish under the platform, and the onboard crew attempted to damp it down unsuccessfully.

Perhaps there'll now be a different risk assessment for grinding alongside open wooden platforms...

Paul

Maybe.  What surprises me is that the Fire Service was called out at 1:30 and yet took many hours to extinguish what was hardly an raging inferno and which one would have thought could be dealt with using a hose reel.  I suspect that as facts emerge, we find out that delays in fire fighting may be connected with isolating traction current.   
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13029


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2016, 14:48:14 »

hmm - ever tried to put out smouldering tar-seeped sleepers and platform supports which aren't easily accessible?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2016, 15:13:48 »

Late morning from ITV:

Quote
These are the current warnings in place for South West Trains:

London Waterloo to Reading will run as scheduled in both directions, but may terminate at Clapham Junction

London Waterloo to Weybridge will run as scheduled in both directions, but may terminate at Clapham Junction

London Waterloo to Windsor & Eton Riverside will not run in both directions

Farnham to London Waterloo via Ascot services departing at 21 and 51 minutes past will not run

London Waterloo to Portsmouth stations may start and terminate at Woking and Guildford

London Waterloo to Salisbury and Exeter st Davids will start and terminate at Basingstoke

Shows what a wide range of routes can be effected ... looks like suburban (but not Windsor lines) and 'via Southampton' are about all that was running.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8451



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2016, 15:25:29 »

Late morning from ITV:

Quote
These are the current warnings in place for South West Trains:

London Waterloo to Reading will run as scheduled in both directions, but may terminate at Clapham Junction

London Waterloo to Weybridge will run as scheduled in both directions, but may terminate at Clapham Junction

London Waterloo to Windsor & Eton Riverside will not run in both directions

Farnham to London Waterloo via Ascot services departing at 21 and 51 minutes past will not run

London Waterloo to Portsmouth stations may start and terminate at Woking and Guildford

London Waterloo to Salisbury and Exeter st Davids will start and terminate at Basingstoke

Shows what a wide range of routes can be effected ... looks like suburban (but not Windsor lines) and 'via Southampton' are about all that was running.
I was at Reading this morning, played musical platforms before catching the 0935 to Plymouth (something wrong with Platform 7 it seemed) and Reading to Waterloo was most certainly not running as scheduled, much to the disgust of numerous customers who had followed the advice supplied by SWT (South West Trains) that it was.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2016, 15:47:42 »

Apparently the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) are reporting the immediate effect, but it's not the cause.   Reports elsewhere said that sparks from a rail grinder set fire to rubbish under the platform, and the onboard crew attempted to damp it down unsuccessfully.

Perhaps there'll now be a different risk assessment for grinding alongside open wooden platforms...

Paul

Maybe.  What surprises me is that the Fire Service was called out at 1:30 and yet took many hours to extinguish what was hardly an raging inferno and which one would have thought could be dealt with using a hose reel.  I suspect that as facts emerge, we find out that delays in fire fighting may be connected with isolating traction current.   

...mmm.  I don't think it would be a good idea to splash water over live signalling power cables and possibly third rail traction supply cables.  It takes time to isolate such things... Roll Eyes
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13029


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2016, 16:05:42 »

Here's an early photo posted on twitter by the London Fire Brigade. Well alight.

Logged
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1637



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2016, 16:49:22 »

At least no one was hurt !.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2016, 17:18:33 »

Apparently the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) are reporting the immediate effect, but it's not the cause.   Reports elsewhere said that sparks from a rail grinder set fire to rubbish under the platform, and the onboard crew attempted to damp it down unsuccessfully.

Perhaps there'll now be a different risk assessment for grinding alongside open wooden platforms...

Paul

Maybe.  What surprises me is that the Fire Service was called out at 1:30 and yet took many hours to extinguish what was hardly an raging inferno and which one would have thought could be dealt with using a hose reel.  I suspect that as facts emerge, we find out that delays in fire fighting may be connected with isolating traction current.   

...mmm.  I don't think it would be a good idea to splash water over live signalling power cables and possibly third rail traction supply cables.  It takes time to isolate such things... Roll Eyes

What happens when it rains?!  Huh Grin
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2016, 17:42:35 »

Directing a solid jet of water at live low voltage* electrical equipment is most unwise since the current may travel along the water and endanger the user.

A spray is fine since there is no continuous path for the current to flow to the user. Directing a spray from a reasonable distance onto a live conductor rail is no more dangerous than standing near the platform edge in a thunderstorm.

* "Low voltage" in this context means as defined in the electrical regulations, i.e. up to 1000 volts. This includes third rail traction current, which varies a fair bit but is 750 volts DC (Direct Current) nominal in most areas, 850 volts on some routes. Power supplies for signalling are typically about 650 volts AC for distribution stepped down to lower voltages as needed.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page