Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
* Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:00 Liskeard to Looe
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
Delayed
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 19:35:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[87] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[74] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[57] senior railcard
[55] Coastal walks - station to station
[30] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Worcester Parkway project  (Read 99148 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #135 on: August 14, 2014, 10:55:28 »

Also I would sugegst it would be politically very difficult to shut Shrub Hill even if Parkway took a lot of it's traffic. If they can't shut Denton with one train a week in one direction then Shrub hill becomes impossible.

There are precedents for a station to be closed where it is replaced by an alternative facility ... a couple I can think of since I got involved in rail stuff are North Woolwich (replaced by King George V) and Abercynon North (replaced by combined station at Abercynon South / renamed Abercynon).
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #136 on: August 14, 2014, 17:49:54 »

Quote
There are precedents for a station to be closed where it is replaced by an alternative facility ... a couple I can think of since I got involved in rail stuff are North Woolwich (replaced by King George V) and Abercynon North (replaced by combined station at Abercynon South / renamed Abercynon).

One which I can recall is Smethwick West, which was replaced by Smethwick Galton Bridge, a few hundred yards away.  Galton Bridge has similarities with Worcester Parkway, in that it has platforms on two levels (Wolverhampton to Birmingham New Street and Stourbridge Junction to Birmingham Snow Hill/Moor Street) where the lines cross one another.  However, I do not know how reliable any connections there may be.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #137 on: August 14, 2014, 19:13:44 »

Another, slightly further into the recent past, would be Tiverton Junction. Closed in 1986 in favour of Tiverton Parkway.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5452


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #138 on: August 15, 2014, 08:16:42 »

...or Filton, closed in favour of Filton Abbey Wood 250m to the south.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1541


View Profile
« Reply #139 on: August 15, 2014, 08:37:07 »

Or Portishead in 1954 to be replaced by a modern futuristic station nearer the town centre that sadly was to close only 10 years later ! Now the site is occupied by the towns only fuel outlet !
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #140 on: August 17, 2014, 13:49:46 »

...or Filton, closed in favour of Filton Abbey Wood 250m to the south.

Since when it has gone from 1 train each way daily to several dozen.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #141 on: August 17, 2014, 15:39:47 »

...or Filton, closed in favour of Filton Abbey Wood 250m to the south.

Since when it has gone from 1 train each way daily to several dozen.

And passenger numbers have risen (from what - probably under 10,000 per annum) to over three quarters of a million.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #142 on: August 17, 2014, 18:57:30 »


And passenger numbers have risen (from what - probably under 10,000 per annum) to over three quarters of a million.

Just shows what you can do by building an office costing a mere ^750 million.
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #143 on: August 17, 2014, 19:14:47 »

Not to forget the billions of pounds worth of stuff designed to kill people that is procured through that office complex.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #144 on: August 17, 2014, 20:37:16 »

Not to forget the billions of pounds worth of stuff designed to kill people that is procured through that office complex.

Steady now! My daughter started her career there, and is no warmonger. I'm ex-military and no warmonger either. Defence of the realm is the first responsibility of any government.

And it has laid the foundations for decent local rail travel.
Logged

Now, please!
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #145 on: August 17, 2014, 21:03:50 »

I'd agree with those sentiments. At the risk of taking this thread completely off topic, recent events in the Ukraine, as well as in Iraq, have shown that when thinking about defence, one needs to take an extremely long term view as to what might happen. One of the reasons why I thought axing our carrier capability on the basis that the new one will (may?) be ready in 10 years time was somewhat foolish.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #146 on: August 17, 2014, 21:27:37 »

Whilst what I said was intended as a little tongue in cheek there's surely no denying that military materiel, if used, is designed to destroy either person or property, even in defence.

Military spending does provide jobs and help sustain our economy. It also aids scientific, medical and other research, and I'm not denying that a responsible government must ensure the defence of its citizens. There are, however, recent wider geo-political issues where the use of our military has, in my opinion, been less than responsible.

No accusations of warmongering to those who work in defence procurement, have served, or who are serving, were intended, but apologies for any offence caused.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #147 on: August 17, 2014, 22:15:41 »

So it is not having it that is the issue but how it is used.
Logged
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #148 on: August 17, 2014, 23:42:29 »

Getting this back onto the original topic, I wonder whether any plans have been produced showing the layout of the proposed station and its car park and the access to it.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #149 on: August 18, 2014, 19:29:41 »

Whilst what I said was intended as a little tongue in cheek there's surely no denying that military materiel, if used, is designed to destroy either person or property, even in defence.

Except when used to drop aid to refugees, as an example...

Quote
No accusations of warmongering to those who work in defence procurement, have served, or who are serving, were intended, but apologies for any offence caused.

No offence taken, although it's your round next time.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page