Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 19:56:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[122] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[120] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[92] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[80] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[56] Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos t...
[49] Across the South West over Easter - trains in pictures
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20
  Print  
Author Topic: GWR Performance Figures  (Read 133163 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13323


View Profile Email
« Reply #105 on: August 03, 2017, 18:28:10 »

Well open to fraud this, and I can eventually see it being stopped. I find this interesting, and thanks for the enlightenment.

I find it hard to believe that there aren't many pax out there putting in claims for delays they never experienced....
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #106 on: August 03, 2017, 21:26:14 »

So, you're saying that someone with a zonal ticket shouldn't be allowed to claim compensation for a delay because others may commit fraud?

Almost all ticket types (Advance Purchase excepted) can be submitted for a fraudulent claim. If the ticket hasn't been head code stamped there's no way for the TOC (Train Operating Company) to know which service it was used on.

Prohibiting legitimate claims because a very small minority commit fraud isn't the answer.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43849



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #107 on: August 04, 2017, 07:00:01 »

Prohibiting legitimate claims because a very small minority commit fraud isn't the answer.

I would agree with that - however, I can't help noting that modern society puts a huge burden on the majority who are going about their normal day to day lives because of a minuscule minority who would abuse the system.

* Think of all that airport security against - well - what proportion of travellers would be attempted terrorists?

* Think about how reluctant "you" are to offer people you don't know a lift in your car (assumption being made there) because of a tiny minority who would [insert nasty action] when travelling with you.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: August 07, 2017, 15:49:35 »

The RDG (Rail Delivery Group, or Reading station, depending on context) (Rail Delivery Group) are now publishing performance figures that record 'to the minute' figures alongside the Public Performance Measure figures that have been published for many years.  Importantly these figures now include station stops en-route, rather than just the terminal stations, at the 80% of stations where that data can be recorded.  They pledge to increase the 80% which will be achieved slowly through existing signalling schemes (such as the one between Preston and Blackpool and the North Wales coast), and I suppose GPS technology or the GSM-R (Global System for Mobile communications - Railway. A simple mobile phone that has been fitted to the turbos to allow them to operate on lines that are not covered by the cab secure radio (CSR). This allows the Network Rail control centre to send simple STOP messages to the driver or the driver to contact the controller in emergency only. When this system is in operation a guard must be provided when in passenger operation.) radio system could also be adapted to be used for such a purpose?

https://www.raildeliverygroup.com/metrics

According to the blurb this will give the most transparent performance figures in Europe.  Along with various other tools on the web, such as www.realtimetrains.co.uk and www.mytrainjourney.co.uk it really is a fantastic amount of information that is now available.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2017, 17:09:28 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #109 on: August 07, 2017, 18:09:06 »

A slight typo in your second link II  Smiley
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19552



View Profile Email
« Reply #110 on: August 16, 2017, 17:12:09 »

Now resolved, with my apologies for the delay in dealing with this issue. CfN. Embarrassed

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: September 01, 2017, 13:25:58 »

A much better month for HSS (High Speed Services) punctuality at 90.3%, and an OK month for LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) at 83%.  The LTV figure much less than this time last year though, so again the MAA (Moving Annual Average) drops, this time to 82.2%.  The HSS MAA rose by 0.1% to 86.7%.

A better, but still disappointing figure for the Bristol services saw its MAA drop to 89.3%, which is now just 0.3% above the trigger level.  However a run of quite poor results this time last year means it is probably unlikely to hit the trigger point for a few months, though it needs figures in the 90s to be sure of that.

Reliability (trains ran) for LTV dropped to 97.4% as a result of the often trotted out 'more than usual trains needing repair' and 'shortage of train crew' dropping the MAA 0.1% from 98.8% to 98.7%.  Dicount trigger is 98%, so still some way to go.

The South Wales-South Coast sector's reliability was a very poor 97.4% which means the trigger discount of 98.5% is perilously close to being breached as it currently stands at 98.6%.  Not sure how many season ticket flows would qualify for a discount on that sector though?

Latest graph attached.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13323


View Profile Email
« Reply #112 on: September 01, 2017, 13:32:26 »

I feel we're getting complacent - to describe nearly 1 in 5 trains that are late (83%) in a period as 'OK' isn't right, sorry. It's poor to appalling frankly
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #113 on: September 01, 2017, 13:46:21 »

I agree, it was only 'OK' in a comparative sense with the figures over the last year or so.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #114 on: September 03, 2017, 08:55:38 »


Reliability (trains ran) for LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) dropped to 97.4% as a result of the often trotted out 'more than usual trains needing repair' and 'shortage of train crew' dropping the MAA (Moving Annual Average) 0.1% from 98.8% to 98.7%.  Dicount trigger is 98%, so still some way to go.





When exactly are the "more trains than usual needing repair" going to have been repaired? this "unusual" scenario has been going on for months now.

(and I agree with Chris B - one in five trains late is anything but "OK", relatively or otherwise)
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13323


View Profile Email
« Reply #115 on: September 03, 2017, 09:02:49 »

All the stock being let go has had maintenance regime cut back. Now they stay longer, a catch up is needed. Of course, this hasn't been planned in advance, thus takes longer than if planned in advance
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #116 on: September 03, 2017, 09:25:52 »

All the stock being let go has had maintenance regime cut back. Now they stay longer, a catch up is needed. Of course, this hasn't been planned in advance, thus takes longer than if planned in advance

Which and how much stock is being "let go"? ........I know some of the Turbos are being moved around, but that's not the same thing.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: September 03, 2017, 11:01:17 »

With regard to the eastern end of the network, the four remaining 180s go by December, and HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) sets start disappearing steadily from late this year I think.  GWR (Great Western Railway) has no say in those dates (other than hopeful begging to whom they are destined to go) as the lease arrangements expire.  To replace them there are the new IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) 800s due from this October, and the new Class 387 fleet can be much better utilised when full Didcot to Paddington usage is introduced with them in January - 45 4-car sets is the final order, and there are already around 30 delivered, but several are spare as the wires only currently go as far as Maidenhead and the driver training programme continues.

Turbos then move to the western end of the network, and they along with the short formation HST's we have been discussing (which fill the gap in the number of Turbos that can now be moved owing to electrification delays/cutbacks) allow GWR to release six single carriage Class 153s which are going to London Midland, and eight 2-car Class 143 pacers which will be almost certainly heading to the scrap heap (at last!).

I would expect the rolling stock situation to be significantly improved upon in January, but can't see much improvement until then.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #118 on: September 03, 2017, 16:41:59 »

Thanks very much for that detailed response II - looking at the state of the service between London and the Westcountry today, improvement can't come soon enough.
Logged
Henry
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 369


View Profile
« Reply #119 on: September 03, 2017, 18:10:59 »


   Certainly from Totnes today,  5 cancellations today for London.
   
   One no train manager, but 4 due to train faults. Might give the train a miss for a few months.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page