Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:35 11 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
11th Jan (2012)
TVM - a fair weather facility? (link)

Train RunningCancelled
11:50 London Paddington to Hereford
Short Run
05:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
07:43 Great Malvern to London Paddington
15:14 Hereford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 11, 2025, 03:43:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[96] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[59] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[53] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[38] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pacers: The train that the UK has struggled to get rid of  (Read 7188 times)
the void
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 134


View Profile
« on: March 07, 2016, 07:26:29 »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35725299

"Moves are finally afoot to get rid of much-maligned trains built from the body of a bus. But how did Britain's railways come to rely on the Pacer?"
Logged
brompton rail
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 262



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2016, 15:46:13 »

It is a shame that BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) journalists can't quite match the pictures to the story. The photos are of Class 143 & 144. The "just stick a Leyland National bus body onto a train" are the class 142. As the photo af an interior shows, the Kilmarnock built Class 143/4 trains are better than class 142 anyway and have nothing to do with Leyland National buses.

Although the new Arriva Northern (starts April) franchise marks the end of Pacers on Northern, there is not yet any solution in sight for Arriva Wales or GWR (Great Western Railway). WHEN electrification extends to Bristol and Cardiff (and Oxford - 2020?) new electric trains will free up Class 165/6 to go elsewhere on GWR and allow class 150 to push the Pacers to the scrapyard. In Wales the valleys may wait hit even longer for electrification.

If these dates slip, my money is on special extension of the 2020 Accessility Deadline for Wales and West Country.

Sorry to be so optimistic!
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2016, 17:40:30 »


If these dates slip, my money is on special extension of the 2020 Accessility Deadline for Wales and West Country.


As far as I know there has been no whisper of that being a possibility, but IMHO (in my humble opinion) it would be the sensible thing to do.  So long as there is sign that electrification has started (and I am thinking of the valley lines in particular here), I think that people will be patient.   Without signs of real progress in electrification, promises of new trains tomorrow will be much harder to sell.   
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2016, 19:25:20 »

Quote
2020 Accessility Deadline
Think this may need to be added to the Acronyms page! Smiley

Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2016, 10:14:47 »

no Pacers meet disability access laws due to come into force in 2020.
Not entirely true, as it says later in the article:
Porterbrook points out that it has already renovated a 144 with a modern interior and put it into service.
I believe that single renovated 144 is compliant.

Although the new Arriva Northern (starts April) franchise marks the end of Pacers on Northern, there is not yet any solution in sight for Arriva Wales or GWR (Great Western Railway). WHEN electrification extends to Bristol and Cardiff (and Oxford - 2020?) new electric trains will free up Class 165/6 to go elsewhere on GWR and allow class 150 to push the Pacers to the scrapyard. In Wales the valleys may wait hit even longer for electrification.
Great Western electrification doesn't need to reach Bristol and Cardiff to release 165s/166s, they don't run that far out. Oxford however... Come to think of it, are there any services which only run between Reading and PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains), or are we going to have to wait until the wires reach Oxford before the Turbo cascade can start?

It looks like the ValleyLines are going to have quite a long wait for electrification, I expect they will still be diesel in 2020 and see either:
  • Pacers getting a temporary exemption from the TSI PRM (Persons with Reduced Mobility) regulations
  • Porterbrook 'ePacers'
  • converted London Underground D-stock
  • some combination of the above
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2016, 10:31:53 »

The turbos can start to be released once the wires reach Reading, but possibly may wait until they reach Didcot to release a decent number. Bear in mind they'll be moving depot, so they'll be wanting to move a decent number in order to keep both depots working & not sitting on their hands.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2016, 12:41:24 »

The wires will reach Didcot before they reach Reading, as Reading-Didcot is scheduled to be finished this September (for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) testing).  Maidenhead to Reading isn't due until the end of next year IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2016, 13:18:21 »

indeed, so end of next year earliest.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2016, 15:21:57 »

Come to think of it, are there any services which only run between Reading and PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains), or are we going to have to wait until the wires reach Oxford before the Turbo cascade can start?

Two train per hour off-peak and more in the peak.  The off-peak service requires a minimum of 5 units to resource (the diagrams are not that simple in practice as economies are made by such things as a RDG(resolve)-PAD, forming a PAD-OXF» (Oxford - next trains) rather than laying over at PAD for 25 minutes, but it's a good figure for starters).  Add the OXF-PAD stoppers into the mix and you're looking at around 10 units minimum off-peak that could be potentially cascaded should the OXF-PAD services become DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains)-PAD services come next December.  In reality it would probably be more than that given the number of units that sit idle off-peak or are marshalled into 4/5/6 car off-peak services.

Enough to start the cascade ball rolling in early 2018 at the latest I'd have thought?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2016, 15:29:54 »

does anyone know how the welsh valleys are going to be electrified?  Hopefully, they will be choosing an OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") system that is not as shall we say "sturdily engineered" as on the mainline.  Surely, something lighter weight and lower cost would be adequate and demonstrate that the UK (United Kingdom) can do electrification to a sensible timescale and budget.   

I fear that if they adopt the same approach, costs will inflate due to more bridges needing to be altered, and the deeper they pile, the greater the chance of running into mine workings. 
Logged
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2016, 11:10:06 »

...Hopefully, they will be choosing an OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") system that is not as shall we say "sturdily engineered" as on the mainline.  Surely, something lighter weight and lower cost would be adequate and demonstrate that the UK (United Kingdom) can do electrification to a sensible timescale and budget.   

I believe that the mainline OLE design (Series 1) is designed for trains running at 140 mph with two pantographs up.  One of the consequences is that the contact wire has to be thicker and tensioned to a higher force.  These criteria wouldn't apply on the Welsh Valley lines, and so I believe the intention is to use a design called Series 2 which would be for lines where the maximum speed would be 100 mph.  Therefore the requirement for the "masculine" design of masts and booms could be relaxed somewhat.  Absolute wire height and associated bridge clearances would still need to be addressed as these are dictated by the requirements of the new European Technical Standards for Interoperability.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2016, 11:18:27 by Visoflex » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2016, 11:21:52 »

Therefore the requirement for the "masculine" design of masts and booms could be relaxed somewhat.

I did take a gander at the Huyton area last year, on the Liverpool to Wigan line, which was Series 2 OHLE I think.  I must admit I still thought it a little masculine.  Good to see the Class 319s plying their trade and looking very smart in their new livery, though once again I was struck by their poor acceleration and I'm glad they never found their way onto the GWML (Great Western Main Line) as originally planned!

This photo demonstrates the Series 2 design, though the zoom lens foreshortens the view and makes it look worse:
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 561


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2016, 17:41:04 »

does anyone know how the welsh valleys are going to be electrified?  Hopefully, they will be choosing an OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") system that is not as shall we say "sturdily engineered" as on the mainline.  Surely, something lighter weight and lower cost would be adequate and demonstrate that the UK (United Kingdom) can do electrification to a sensible timescale and budget.   

I fear that if they adopt the same approach, costs will inflate due to more bridges needing to be altered, and the deeper they pile, the greater the chance of running into mine workings. 

No, no-one knows. Part of the issue is that Welsh rail infrastructure is currently the responsibility of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) in London, Cardiff would like it to be devolved to them but there's a high degree of interdependence between Welsh and English networks (the Marches line and Shrewsbury are signalled out of Cardiff for example), so it's not as clear cut as say, Scotland. Certain parties in Wales would like to convert some of the Valley lines to light rail as a way to gain control of the infrastructure (and theoretically save costs), but it's unclear as to whether light rail could really handle the passenger volumes and whether it would really save any money.

Anyway, the difference in cost of the new Furrer+Frey OHLE and say a lightweight tram line isn't massive. The 'big ticket' items with electrification (in no particular order) are:

- Provision of OHLE, power supplies and associated control systems
- Replacement of bridges/lowering of track/adjustments to canopies to allow sufficient clearance (generally the same whatever the voltage)
- Immunisation of signalling against electrification currents, replacement of gantries (recent resignalling should be compatible anyway) - resignalling is generally done as a precursor to electrification.
- Provision of new rolling stock (even if it's leased, you have one-off costs relating to staff training etc)

Not strictly part of electrification, but inevitably accompanying it, is work to handle the higher traffic volumes that will almost inevitably result from electrification and faster/more frequent services. These include improvements to trackwork (e.g. Filton Bank quadrupling), platform extensions, fly-overs/dive-unders and then you have the 1001 other jobs that have needed doing for years but are hard to ignore when you have people and plan on the track such as track renewals, tunnel linings etc.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2016, 08:26:55 »

The announcement yesterday that Scotrail is keeping an additional 39 class 170 vehicles will reduce further the options for a dmu cascade in 2018 that could have enabled the last pacers to be withdrawn before 2020.

But great news for Scottish rail services!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2016, 09:06:09 »

No one had yet picked up the ScotRail Class 170s that were potentially being released as it was always likely ScotRail would retain most of the fleet. The nine 170s going to GTR/Southern are unaffected by this announcement.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page