Shazz
|
|
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2008, 11:44:31 » |
|
The only way i could see this possible is if ATW▸ are acrually taking the extra 180's and freeing up lots of 158's /175's to replace there 150's on longer distance routes
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2008, 14:07:57 » |
|
One point worth thinking about though, is the 16.30 CDF» -PMH, 16.22 PMH-CDF and 06.00 PMH-CDF, which are ALL booked 4 car - what will happen to them??
One would think that they would probably just be a 3 car, but don't know?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tramway
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2008, 15:27:10 » |
|
IIRC▸ not all Wessex 158's were converted, but they seem to have diagrammed things so there were still 4 cars on peak services.
That was what was so annoying about the Dec 06 timetable, just blew all the hard work to get a reslient service out of the water. It's taken 2 years to return to Wessex service levels which everyone was content could be built on.
Other members probably have more ready access to passenger figures for the past 5 years to compare pre and post franchise change, and to see what effect it has had financially.
As Graham has pointed out at length, there were substantial groth figures in the region pre 12/06, and given possible projection figures and subsequent real passenger numbers I wonder what the impact has really been.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2008, 16:29:31 » |
|
One point worth thinking about though, is the 16.30 CDF» -PMH, 16.22 PMH-CDF and 06.00 PMH-CDF, which are ALL booked 4 car - what will happen to them??
Stay 4 car I imagine with other services becoming 3 car, or maybe 5 car if they feel generous.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2008, 16:36:53 » |
|
One point worth thinking about though, is the 16.30 CDF» -PMH, 16.22 PMH-CDF and 06.00 PMH-CDF, which are ALL booked 4 car - what will happen to them??
Stay 4 car I imagine with other services becoming 3 car, or maybe 5 car if they feel generous. Don't forget, the overall number of 158 sets will actually be reduced so less strengthening unit's, unles they are to be strengthened with 150/153's.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2008, 16:54:17 » |
|
Or simply strenghthen them between Cardiff and Salisbury/Southampton with a 150 and then send the 150 as a Soton - Swindon (via Melksham ) stopper!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2008, 23:49:17 » |
|
Excellent, with 180s back on the Cotswold line, FGW▸ can get rid of a lot of their "short platforms" on the list (eg Forgate Street)!
People will have tables and legroom again!
Then again, seeing is believing!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2008, 09:49:15 » |
|
Excellent, with 180s back on the Cotswold line, FGW▸ can get rid of a lot of their "short platforms" on the list (eg Forgate Street)!
People will have tables and legroom again!
Then again, seeing is believing!
Very true! One thing Btline, your picture of a class 172 isn't too accurate as the 172's are being built with gangway ends.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dog box
|
|
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2008, 17:40:37 » |
|
Wonder what Mr Ambrose and his mates think about this then.........looks as if they might have to rename themselves just LESS STRAIN,
|
|
|
Logged
|
All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2008, 19:31:36 » |
|
Wonder what Mr Ambrose and his mates think about this then.........looks as if they might have to rename themselves just LESS STRAIN,
If what Vacman has told us happens then MTLS▸ would be finished. Once again they've gone very quiet again and the daily life of a FGW▸ commuter continues as normal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2008, 19:33:29 » |
|
I propose a renaming:
MTLTA
"More Trains, Less Tony Ambrose"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2008, 19:54:49 » |
|
Excellent, with 180s back on the Cotswold line, FGW▸ can get rid of a lot of their "short platforms" on the list (eg Forgate Street)!
People will have tables and legroom again!
Then again, seeing is believing!
Very true! One thing Btline, your picture of a class 172 isn't too accurate as the 172's are being built with gangway ends. Sort of! The picture is of the Class 172/0 which will be for Chiltern Railways and London Overground. These will have a top speed of 75 mi/h and will not have end gangways. The Snow Hill Lines will be getting 172/2 and 172/3 which will have end gangways and a higher speed of 100 mi/h. Look at Wikipedia for more details. The most important thing is, whatever they look like, it may spell the end of overcrowding in Bristol (assuming the new stock this year does not have the full effect)!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2008, 20:57:49 » |
|
If what Vacman has told us happens then MTLS▸ would be finished. Once again they've gone very quiet again and the daily life of a FGW▸ commuter continues as normal.
To be fair, more than 3 coaches would probably be wise for some services ..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2008, 21:13:06 » |
|
To be fair, more than 3 coaches would probably be wise for some services ..
Couldn't agree more, 3 coaches for most trains on the Cardiff-Pompey line is the minimum and that was over a year ago. Since then passenger numbers have continued to increase though I suspect many have been put of from using this line ever again when they have been left behind on the platform because the two car 158 that turned up was already rammed full.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim
|
|
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2008, 00:23:23 » |
|
IIRC▸ not all Wessex 158's were converted, but they seem to have diagrammed things so there were still 4 cars on peak services.
I belive so yes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheers Jim AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
|
|
|
|