Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:55 07 Mar 2025
 
* Flights halted at some Florida airports over SpaceX debris
- Teen armed with gun overpowered by passengers onboard plane
- Worst train stations for cancellations named and shamed for first time
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/03/25 - Community Rail Awards
19/03/25 - WWRUG AGM
19/03/25 - Forum offline 00:00 - 02:00
21/03/25 - TWSW General Meeting

On this day
7th Mar (1966)
Passenger services withdrawn from Wilton South (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 07, 2025, 02:13:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[200] The LNER Azuma experience
[88] Looe timetable changes this Summer
[44] Most remote stations....
[38] Over the country towards Skye
[25] Coffee Shop offline early on 19th March 2025
[23] "Worst railway stations named and shamed for first time"...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The 1803 daily fault  (Read 14540 times)
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3542

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« on: January 28, 2016, 22:07:57 »

I've noticed every evening this week on journeycheck that the 1803 from Paddington isn't calling at Totnes due to a train fault.

Quote
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance due 23:13 
This train will no longer call at Totnes.
This is due to a fault on this train.

What kind of fault would prevent the train calling at Totnes every evening in a week?
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10208



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2016, 22:30:09 »

It would suggest one power car shut down but I understood if that was the case the train wouldn't be allowed past Newton Abbot.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3542

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2016, 22:44:40 »

Seems strange assumingly the same fault every day. A play with real time trains suggests the golden hind is the same set every day, and doesn't have long in a depot to be fixed if there is a fault with a 5 hour break at most.

The set is doing
0505 Penzance to Paddington (arr 1002) 1 late
1045 Paddington to Swansea (arr 1344) 2 early
1428 Swansea to Paddington (arr 1731) 10 late
1803 Paddington to Penzance (arr 2313) 2 early at Plymouth, last report.

Can't be anything much wrong as it's keeping time ok.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7396


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2016, 23:19:22 »

It would suggest one power car shut down but I understood if that was the case the train wouldn't be allowed past Newton Abbot.
Would it really be that simple?

In the Western Route Sectional Appendix, Module WR1, it has the following (only parts about the GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) main line quoted):
1. Lines over which assistance must always be provided
... (none on the main line)
2. Lines over which assistance must be provided under certain conditions
^ Newton Abbot to Plymouth
^ Plymouth to Newton Abbot (train may proceed as far as Tavistock Jn if this would facilitate assistance)
^ Paignton to Newton Abbot
^ Par to St Austell
...
If any of the following circumstances apply in respect of the above sections, assistance must be provided:
13. the train comprises more than 8 trailer vehicles.
14. rail head conditions in the area concerned are reported as poor, for example during falling snow, severe
frost, drizzle or period of leaf fall.
15. other technical problems exist with the train, to which the Driver or the train operator^s Fleet Controller will draw attention.
16. signalling equipment failures or temporary/ emergency speed restrictions exist in the section preventing an unchecked run being made.
3. Authority to proceed unassisted over the lines listed in 2. above.
For trains comprising not more than 8 trailer vehicles, an ^HST (High Speed Train) Authority to Proceed Unassisted^ form (reproduced at
the end of this Instruction) may be issued provided that none of the circumstances listed in clause 2 exist and that the
following arrangements are made:
a) Operations Control must obtain the permission of the appropriate train operator^s Fleet Controller.
b) Operations Control must ascertain that local weather conditions are suitable, and arrange (as far as is practicable)
with the controlling Signaller for a ^clear run^ to be provided as indicated below:
From To Remarks
Signal E90 (West of Newton Abbot)Signal E94 (West of Dainton) --
Signal E94 (West of Dainton) Signal DM227 (Marley
Tunnel)
Applicable only to trains formed
with 8 trailer vehicles. Train must
not stop at Totnes or be routed via
the Down Platform Line thereat.
Signal E98/E198 (Totnes) Signal DM227 (Marley
Tunnel)
Applies to trains formed with 7
trailer vehicles or less.
Signal E3/E203 (Totnes) Signal E7 (East of Dainton)--
Plymouth Station Signal UM235 (Ivybridge)--
Par St Austell --

Then there's some stuff about the form and what if it stops in section.

Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19289



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2016, 23:31:13 »

Has it really omitted Totnes everyday this week? Tonight has it on the Down Through on Realtime Trains as JourneyCheck suggested.

Mon-Weds though shows the 1803 made its booked call on P1 at Totnes.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3542

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2016, 23:51:32 »

Has it really omitted Totnes everyday this week? Tonight has it on the Down Through on Realtime Trains as JourneyCheck suggested.

Mon-Weds though shows the 1803 made its booked call on P1 at Totnes.

Tuesday and Wednesday were both on journey check as not stopping. Monday I maybe mistaken though. Is journey check accurate? Possible errors on journey check?
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19289



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2016, 23:56:35 »

Or possible errors on RTT» (Real Time Trains - website).

Although the timings at Totnes do show the 1803 on P1 and waits of around 2 minutes.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5653



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2016, 12:03:46 »

The fact that the service ran on time, or nearly so, suggests that both power cars were running. Perhaps doubts existed about the reliability of one power car, and they did not want to take the risk of it shutting down at or near Tottnes, and the train being unable to make it up the incline.

Or could it have been a wheel slip protection fault ? even with both power cars running, a climb away from the station stop might be problematic with defective WSP.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Henry
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 369


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2016, 13:12:28 »

 I suppose not a wise decision at the time to place a station at the bottom of a hill !

 What provokes my frustration is when the PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) is cancelled, an hour wait for the next one (or longer
 if you change at newton Abbot). Then watch your 'cancelled' service pass on the fast line.
 
 
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4514


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2016, 13:21:32 »

I suppose not a wise decision at the time to place a station at the bottom of a hill !

 What provokes my frustration is when the PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) is cancelled, an hour wait for the next one (or longer
 if you change at newton Abbot). Then watch your 'cancelled' service pass on the fast line.
 
 

The people who built the either town or the hill there should have foreseen the problem.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page