Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 28 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningCancelled
16:26 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:07 Newbury to Reading
17:12 Westbury to Warminster
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:06 Reading to Newbury
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:48 Newbury to Reading
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
Short Run
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:01 Severn Beach to Salisbury
17:05 London Paddington to Newbury
17:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:00 Newbury to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:27 Newbury to London Paddington
Delayed
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
This is
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2025, 17:26:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[143] Chiltern Railways: an update on rolling stock / services
[80] Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion, merged topics
[56] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[49] North Cotswold line - driver route knowledge
[38] Stop orders as cover for cancelled services
[34] Doublebagging, Rawdoggers, Barebackers
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Arrest after 'man gets into train driver's cab'  (Read 20265 times)
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2165



View Profile
« on: December 09, 2015, 12:07:16 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)
Quote
Arrest after 'man gets into train driver's cab'

British Transport Police were first called to Totnes railway station   Image copyright Google Image caption

A man has been arrested after police were told someone entered the driver's cab of an overnight train.

British Transport Police said they were called to Totnes station in Devon at 05:45 GMT after reports of an incident on the London-Penzance sleeper.

A man was also alleged to have climbed out of a train window and on to tracks before reboarding the service, which carried on, officers said.

A 51-year-old from Canterbury was arrested later in Plymouth.

Officers said the man got back on the train and staff kept him onboard until it arrived in Plymouth. He was arrested on suspicion of obstructing the railway.

British Transport Police said: "At this stage, there is no evidence to suggest any threats were made towards the driver or other passengers during the incident.

"We would like to stress that, at this time, this appears to be an isolated incident rather than part of any wider threat to the rail network."
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8636



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2015, 12:17:32 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13343


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2015, 12:24:05 »

Suspect the driver allowed this to happen to clear him off the rails. The driver wouldn't have continued if there was any kind of danger to crew/passengers? If the driver was under threat of harm, surely the report from the police would have ben different?
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2015, 12:35:41 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?

Through the door perhaps?  Grin Wink
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2015, 12:38:27 »

Bit of a coincidence - couple of weeks ago on one of the turbos i was sitting up front by the cab. Someone came wandering through the train and started pulling at the cab door. He was dancing around like he needed the loo, and then got off when the train arrived at Reading. I am sure he thought it was the door to the toilet!
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3568

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2015, 12:41:03 »

As it was a sleeper, it isn't possible to accidently wonder into the driving cab, so a deliberate attempt to enter the cab. Cant accidently confuse a 57 for a coach.

Someone exiting through the window does make me wonder whether drink or drugs were involved.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8636



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2015, 13:08:27 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?

Through the door perhaps?  Grin Wink

In the current climate of raised security and terrorist threats, I'm not sure I'd be treating this as matter for laughter, you will recall how terrorists got control of the planes on 9/11?

Why was the cab not secured? Presumably the driver can lock it?
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2015, 14:12:49 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?

Through the door perhaps?  Grin Wink

In the current climate of raised security and terrorist threats, I'm not sure I'd be treating this as matter for laughter, you will recall how terrorists got control of the planes on 9/11?

Why was the cab not secured? Presumably the driver can lock it?

Yep, they stabbed a few people and forced entry. Want to get into a locked train cab? Break a window, maybe stab/shoot/etc a member of staff and steal his/her keys.

I'm not sure if they can be locked from inside, but I doubt many drivers would bother - you often see trains with manual cab doors running about with a door open during the warmer months for some extra ventilation.

You may now have your sense of humour re-attached.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5676



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2015, 14:14:19 »

Whilst we do not know what happened, I have a strong suspicion that either the driver was in the cab and had not locked the cab door, or had briefly left the cab and had omitted to lock the door.

IME ('in my experience'), drivers are careful to lock the cab door when in bad or potentially dodgy areas, but don't always bother in places, or at times of day that they judge to be low risk.

 This case appears to involve a lone person perhaps with mental health issues, or possibly affected by drink or drugs, and does not appear to have been any serious threat to the crew, passengers or train.
However in todays troubled world, there is always the chance that terrorists might seek to take over a train with most serious results.

I therefore urge that train drivers (and others with legitimated access to the driving cab) should be more vigilant than in the past. A terrorist attempting to take over a train would probably prefer an apparently low risk time and place.

I appreciate that driving a train is more complex than it may seem, and that various safety devices have to operated correctly or isolated. This should not give a false sense of security, remember that the membership of a large terrorist group might include an experienced train driver. They only need one.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2015, 14:22:07 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?

Through the door perhaps?  Grin Wink
In the current climate of raised security and terrorist threats

My understanding is that the threat level for the UK (United Kingdom) has not changed, despite recent events, since 29th August 2014.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2015, 14:27:56 »

Whilst we do not know what happened, I have a strong suspicion that either the driver was in the cab and had not locked the cab door, or had briefly left the cab and had omitted to lock the door.

IME ('in my experience'), drivers are careful to lock the cab door when in bad or potentially dodgy areas, but don't always bother in places, or at times of day that they judge to be low risk.

 This case appears to involve a lone person perhaps with mental health issues, or possibly affected by drink or drugs, and does not appear to have been any serious threat to the crew, passengers or train.
However in todays troubled world, there is always the chance that terrorists might seek to take over a train with most serious results.

I therefore urge that train drivers (and others with legitimated access to the driving cab) should be more vigilant than in the past. A terrorist attempting to take over a train would probably prefer an apparently low risk time and place.

I appreciate that driving a train is more complex than it may seem, and that various safety devices have to operated correctly or isolated. This should not give a false sense of security, remember that the membership of a large terrorist group might include an experienced train driver. They only need one.



I think we've seen a clear change in the modus operandi of these groups, beginning with the Mumbai attacks. Previously mass transit appeared to be the preferred target (a particular favourite of the so called Al Qaeda). Now they seem to have moved on to large groups of people targeted by guns, suicide bombs and knives.

I seriously doubt the PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-PNZ sleeper train is terribly interesting to these people! I think you'll find this incident was a p!ssed person simply being a complete and utter tool!
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8636



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2015, 14:28:50 »

...............and how on Earth did he get access to the driver's cab?

Through the door perhaps?  Grin Wink
In the current climate of raised security and terrorist threats

My understanding is that the threat level for the UK (United Kingdom) has not changed, despite recent events, since 29th August 2014.

Yep, it's severe, meaning an attack is highly likely, so in other words, keep the bloody doors locked!

Broadgage you have got it absolutely right.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1114


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2015, 17:46:44 »

Locking the cab door whilst present in the driving cab of a train is downright dangerous to the driver. It's our only means of escape in the event of an emergency.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2015, 19:42:53 »

I did wonder what drivers would think of the suggestion. Thanks for clarifying a-driver.

I was a bit surprised how quickly this thread escalated to 'terrorist threat' when there was zero evidence. 
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5676



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2015, 19:54:51 »

I did wonder what drivers would think of the suggestion. Thanks for clarifying a-driver.

I was a bit surprised how quickly this thread escalated to 'terrorist threat' when there was zero evidence. 

I for one never suggested that this episode was a terrorist incident or threat, indeed I stated that it appeared to be one person under the influence of drink or drugs, or with mental health issues.

However it is beyond doubt that an unauthorised person DID (Didcot Parkway) get access to the driving cab, and thoughts naturally turned to the potentially very serious consequences if a terrorist got access with the same apparent ease.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page