ChrisB
|
|
« on: November 30, 2015, 09:25:17 » |
|
Already mooted, but apparently (according to The Times) confirmed in the Chancellor's Autumn Statement. Presumably to be split away from the GWR▸ franchise on next renewal (2019?)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
plymothian
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2015, 10:06:28 » |
|
More specifically, The government is launching the competition on the new South Western rail franchise which will incentivise bidders to increase capacity and significantly improve passenger satisfaction and performance standards, as well as providing more smart-ticketing and free Wi-Fi across all trains. Earlier this year, the government also confirmed a ^360 million order for a fleet of new trains on the Great Western franchise, which will provide more seating and better journeys into Devon and Cornwall. The trains will be delivered from 2018. DfT» will also work with the Peninsula Rail Task Force and other local stakeholders in the South West to publish a report next year with options for creating a dedicated new franchise for Devon and Cornwall. Spending review and autumn statement 2015
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2015, 10:14:04 » |
|
But presumably as there is nothing in the SW, (i.e. present SWT▸ ) franchise consultation, they've abandoned that earlier idea of taking over the Waterloo - Exeter route as well?
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2015, 10:46:20 » |
|
But presumably as there is nothing in the SW, (i.e. present SWT▸ ) franchise consultation, they've abandoned that earlier idea of taking over the Waterloo - Exeter route as well?
Paul
Given that the current GW▸ franchise runs to 2019 plus one year option, and the transition that it was intended to cover may last longer than that, it may well line up well enough with the next SWT franchise but one. The current bids are for 7-9 years plus a one year option, so it can end in 2024. presumably any handover to a new franchise can be phased a couple of years later than its start anyway.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2015, 11:01:11 » |
|
Two franchises running alongside each other seems logical, perhaps they could call it 'Wessex Trains'.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5456
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2015, 11:03:16 » |
|
The phrase "for Devon and Cornwall" is a bit ambiguous - it could mean "limited to the area of Devon and Cornwall", but could it not alternatively be interpreted mean "serving all the needs of Devon and Cornwall", which would include connecting them to the capital via the Waterloo - Exeter route?
In the context of the Peninsula Rail Task Force: LSWR▸ , anyone?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2015, 11:31:10 » |
|
And who provides the cross border services?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2015, 11:32:35 » |
|
I'm of the thinking they're referring to local services here....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2015, 11:59:00 » |
|
If DfT» have yet to discuss with outsiders and produce a report with options, there is no single "new franchise" to describe. However, no doubt there is a departmental view. I suspect it will ultimately depend on whether the DfT view is that big franchises are best, or whether smaller ones work better and these relatively big ones ought to be subdivided.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2015, 12:01:34 » |
|
The phrase "for Devon and Cornwall" is a bit ambiguous - it could mean "limited to the area of Devon and Cornwall", but could it not alternatively be interpreted mean "serving all the needs of Devon and Cornwall", which would include connecting them to the capital via the Waterloo - Exeter route? In which case wouldn't it also need to include the class 802 Paddington to Plymouth/Penzance trains. Rather than GWR▸ 's 'building a greater west' it would become 'Lesser Western', with INTERCITY routes due to be cut in 2018 and again at the end of the franchise if the Devon & Cornwall franchise happens and takes over London trains.
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2015, 12:11:01 » |
|
which they won't as it'll abstract a lot of the profit from the GW▸ franchise. Hence my opinion it means what it says....Devon & Cornwall services.
And I'm sure the DfT» has been talking to the councils/transport bodies as I reckon it's they that are lobbying for this
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2015, 12:13:43 » |
|
I'm of the thinking they're referring to local services here....
So the Greater Western franchise keeps Cardiff-Paignton, Bristol-Penzance, Cardiff/Bristol-Exeter? Or terminates them all at Taunton? Does the D&C franchise do likewise - going no further than Tiverton Parkway?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2015, 12:36:00 » |
|
I'm of the thinking they're referring to local services here....
So the Greater Western franchise keeps Cardiff-Paignton, Bristol-Penzance, Cardiff/Bristol-Exeter? Or terminates them all at Taunton? Some very interesting discussions to be had, me thinks. Please note that I'm playing Devil's advocate here ...It's often surprised me when travelling in Europe across certain borders such as Netherlands to Belgium, Netherlands to Germany, France to Germany just how few trains actually cross the border - you have national networks with just the occasional very slim link across (such as Venlo) - but so much of that comes with there being 2 nations. If you're looking at devolution for Cornwall, does Devon follow and how much does that then move us towards a federal United Kingdom, or even independence for the "Peninsular" - and when you get to that point, demand is probably going to be for trains that turn around at Taunton from the east, at Exeter from the west, with internationalesque services calling at Exeter and Taunton, running not very frequently, and not requiring to be wildly fast due to the economic separation of Peninsularia (that new country) from England. Taking a less provocative and intermediate approach (which is what it looks like the Peninsula rail group wants) there's a look for them to operate trains in their own area ... logic could be for them to run the "London"s too, with GWR▸ being a territory-based franchised based on services from London via Didcot and Swindon. There's another logical option that suggests the London to Peninsular services, because they run across between Franchise areas, could from that point be operated by CrossCountry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2015, 13:11:21 » |
|
I'm of the thinking they're referring to local services here.... So the Greater Western franchise keeps Cardiff-Paignton, Bristol-Penzance, Cardiff/Bristol-Exeter? Or terminates them all at Taunton? I know you're not stupid....what do you think? GWR▸ retains them - and neither do I consider them *local* services, frankly
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2015, 13:49:24 » |
|
I know you're not stupid....what do you think?
No idea as I've seen no firm proposals of what this Devon & Cornwall franchise will or won't do. It's hardly been confirmed, as suggested in the OP▸ . A report with options is all that has been asked for by government. That's why I'm asking questions. What could those options be. The Peninsular Rail Task Force includes Somerset County Council who may well want a say on services to Taunton, Yeovil, Bridgwater, Crewkerne, Templecombe... Pray tell, what do you consider local, and why should the Greater Western franchisee (not necessarily GWR▸ remember) keep cross border regional services, or indeed London to peninsular services? Because they are profitable? Doesn't that rather condemn a D&C franchise to heavy subsidy? and neither do I consider them *local* services, frankly
Neither do I. I brought them up as they are services that provide for local journeys in Devon and Cornwall but start/end outside those counties.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
|