Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 10 May 2025
 
- Maga says Pope Leo may be American, but he's not 'America first'
- Greater Anglia to be nationalised in October
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - BRTA Westbury
today - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 10th May

Train RunningCancelled
06:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
07:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
08:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
11:48 London Paddington to Bridgend
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:37 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:43 Cardiff Central to Weston-Super-Mare
Short Run
06:57 Taunton to London Paddington
07:33 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
08:30 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
08:51 Penzance to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:30 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
06:38 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
07:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
08:00 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
08:44 Swindon to Westbury
08:48 London Paddington to Neath
10:48 London Paddington to Neath
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 10, 2025, 09:21:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[80] Edinburgh: Repairs to historic North Bridge delayed again to 2...
[69] Posting news items from the press / broadcast media on the Cof...
[67] Diary Of A Reasonably Frequent Rail User
[56] Power car named after Mark Carne - 12 Jul 18
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[52] Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New build standards  (Read 4051 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44028



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 01, 2015, 19:03:19 »

What are the new build standards for platform lengths?  3 car train at 23 metres / carriage calculates out at 78 metres, but what extra allowance is required for pulling up inaccuracies, or may be taken off to allow for doors not quite at end of carriages?  What about allowing for future carriage lengths of up to 26 metres?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7431


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2015, 19:37:02 »

What are the new build standards for platform lengths?  3 car train at 23 metres / carriage calculates out at 78 metres, but what extra allowance is required for pulling up inaccuracies, or may be taken off to allow for doors not quite at end of carriages?  What about allowing for future carriage lengths of up to 26 metres?

I think the answer is "yes, you are right". The official standard (GT/RT 7016) says:
Quote
5.1 General requirement for usable length of platforms
  • 5.1.1 Except as identified in section 5.2, the usable length of platforms shall be long enough to accommodate the longest train formation regularly booked to stop at a platform, with allowances for inaccurate stopping and operational (including train control) requirements.
  • 5.1.2 The usable length of terminal platforms shall include an allowance both for the train to stop before it reaches the buffer stops and for the length taken up by the buffer stop equipment.
There follow a number of let-outs and work-rounds for short paltforms.

But where (you reply) are the actual numbers involved specified? They are not in any standard, but to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

There is also a TSI (2008/57/EC), for high-speed lines, but in this case it is pretty much common sense.

Quote
4.2.10.1. Usable length of platforms
All TSI categories of line
(1) The platform length shall be sufficient to accommodate the longest interoperable train intended to stop at the platform in normal service. When determining the length of trains intended to stop at the platform, consideration shall be given to both the current service requirements and the reasonably foreseeable service requirements at least ten years following the bringing into service of the platform.
(2) It is permissible to build only the length of platform required for the current service requirement provided passive provision is made for the reasonably foreseeable future service requirements.
(3) The usable length of a platform shall be declared in the Register of Infrastructure.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19618



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2015, 19:41:12 »

But where (you reply) are the actual numbers involved specified? They are not in any standard, but to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

So, just how long is a piece of string, anyway ...  Roll Eyes Wink Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2015, 09:00:58 »

Quote
So, just how long is a piece of string, anyway ...  Roll Eyes Wink Grin

Twice half its length - obviously!
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7431


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2015, 09:56:44 »

Quote
So, just how long is a piece of string, anyway ...  Roll Eyes Wink Grin

Twice half its length - obviously!

But not twice the length of two pieces of string half as long, joined by a knot.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2015, 11:15:09 »

  What about allowing for future carriage lengths of up to 26 metres?

Is this a general trend or just the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.)?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2015, 11:57:30 »

I suspect that 26M vehicles may be a long term trend.
Considerable expense and trouble is involved in clearing a route for 26M vehicles.
Having spent all that money, it would seem reasonable that future builds of suburban trains or even new sleeper stock might well be 26M.

Within reason, longer rail vehicles are better, fewer bogies to maintain, fewer gangway connections to maintain, fewer air conditioning units to maintain. And less space in percentage of total train length is wasted in doorways, vestibules, and gangways between vehicles.

(I have previously expressed doubts about the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.), but it is NOT the longer vehicles to which I object, longer is better within reason)
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44028



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2015, 12:03:24 »

I am thinking that an 85 metre platform for services which may go up to 3 coaches is about right for the future.  That's 3 x 26 metres plus 7 metres "wobble" on stopping.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page