Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 10 Jan 2025
 
* Three teens arrested over boy's bus station death
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:22 Newquay to Par
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 20:27:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[85] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[81] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[72] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
[34] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24
  Print  
Author Topic: E-bike and E-scooter - ongoing issues and discussion (merged posts)  (Read 128693 times)
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1269


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 03, 2020, 08:38:47 »

In Central London, the TfL» (Transport for London - about) bikes are a common sight. Also now increasingly common to see are the dockless hire bikes from other companies scattered inconsiderately along the pavement. I presume e-scooters will need to be docked so they can be charged otherwise they would join this clutter.

My other concern is potholes. Won't the scooters smaller wheels make the riders more vulnerable to accidents than other road users?
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 849


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 03, 2020, 08:57:06 »

I will be sticking with my pedal cycle; I am unconvinced that allowing eScooters to use cycle paths/lanes - given the potential speed differential - is a good idea. Also does the ban on eScooters using pavements extend to footways which have been changed into shared pedestrian/cycle facilities?
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2020, 09:24:21 »


 Local residents will soon be able to use e-scooters on roads, cycle lanes and tracks, but they will be strictly prohibited on pavements. E-scooters will be limited to 15.5mph and riders are recommended to wear helmets.

Users will need a full or provisional car, motorcycle or moped licence to take part in the trials, and must be 16 or over. To avoid a flood of poor-quality scooters onto the streets, the regulations only cover rental schemes. Individually owned scooters will still be illegal on public roads.


I think 15.5 mph is too fast. But the most important thing to me is how are these rules to enforced? We already have bikes, on pavements and in pedestrian only areas. Without much regulation. Add in mobility scooters and the poor pedestrian doesn't stand a chance.

« Last Edit: July 03, 2020, 14:38:08 by Red Squirrel » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7371


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2020, 09:29:08 »

My other concern is potholes. Won't the scooters smaller wheels make the riders more vulnerable to accidents than other road users?

There's a way round that problem - at least in Plymouth. AKA (also known as) foot bikes - but mainly for sports use, and I don't think the big hirers do anything similar.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2020, 10:20:16 »

Quote
The seafront at Weymouth hosts a wider variety of travel modes on the road and wide esplanade
But in the case of Weymouth, fairly large areas of prohibition of bicycles. So will bikes be prohibited but e-scooters acceptable?I

I would prefer to see E scooters subjected to the same rules, restrictions and regulations as cycles. If cycles are allowed then E scooters should be. If cycles are prohibited, then so should be E scooters.
I support the use of lightweight electric transport for reasons already given, but I also dislike excessive regulation, and the army of well paid civil servants and officials whose job it is to enforce such regulations, and to find ways of adding complexity to such regulations.
Subjecting E scooters to the same restrictions on speed and weight as electrically assisted cycles has the advantage of simplicity.
Treating them as cycles as regards where and how they may be used also has the merits of simplicity.
Such regulations should be national, so as to stop each local authority from having their own regulations. (And having a well paid committee drawing up these local regulations)

Amend the relevant sections of the Highway Code by replacing the word "cycles" with "cycles, E scooters and similar vehicles"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: July 03, 2020, 10:44:41 »

I will be sticking with my pedal cycle; I am unconvinced that allowing eScooters to use cycle paths/lanes - given the potential speed differential - is a good idea. Also does the ban on eScooters using pavements extend to footways which have been changed into shared pedestrian/cycle facilities?

I would treat them as cycles.
So banned from pavements, EXCEPT when such a way is clearly designated as a shared cycleway and foot way.
Wearing a safety hat would be prudent but should not in my view be a legal requirement, just as wearing protective headgear is ADVISED but not required for cycling.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5456


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2020, 12:27:52 »

...clearly designated...

There, in my experience, is the rub.

It would be easy to come to the conclusion that for the most part cycle paths are designed by non-cyclists who really don't care how usable they are as long as they look good from a passing car. Too often they end in eccentric or ambiguous ways, more or less forcing users to ride on the pavement or negotiate dangerous junctions from the worst possible approach.

If a whole new class of user is to be forcibly injected on to this already-inadequate 'network', then I suggest that the number of accidents is likely to rise sharply.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: July 03, 2020, 13:02:30 »

I agree that many cycle routes are very poorly designed, that however is in my view a reason to push for improvements and is not a reason to prohibit use of cycle routes by E scooters.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: July 03, 2020, 17:25:20 »

In Central London, the TfL» (Transport for London - about) bikes are a common sight. Also now increasingly common to see are the dockless hire bikes from other companies scattered inconsiderately along the pavement. I presume e-scooters will need to be docked so they can be charged otherwise they would join this clutter.

My other concern is potholes. Won't the scooters smaller wheels make the riders more vulnerable to accidents than other road users?
This scheme is specifically for docked hire scooters. I don't know if the docks incorporate chargers or if they'll be collected up from time to time and charged. The private ones currently on the road obviously don't dock, but being personal possessions they're unlikely to be left around in random places. It seems most people fold them up (the tube connecting the handlebars to the front wheel telescopes and/or folds flat) and keep them under their desks.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #39 on: October 02, 2020, 08:48:03 »

From The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
E-scooters should be legalised on roads but riding on pavements should be prohibited, the Transport Committee of MPs (Member of Parliament) has said.

Currently, privately-owned e-scooters are banned to use in the UK (United Kingdom) anywhere except on private land.

The committee argues the vehicles, which usually travel 9-15mph, could offer a green alternative to the car.

Official trials of rented e-scooters have already been announced in some places in England.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: October 02, 2020, 09:49:30 »

A good idea, but one that is already being abused by people who can get them to go as fast as 50mph. What about lights at night and insurance.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5456


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: October 02, 2020, 09:58:32 »

It seems eccentric that on this island, exceptionally, these vehicles are not considered safe.

I was, as is my wont, amused by the use of good ol' US Customary units. 15.5 mph is, of course, 25km/h in real money.

The issue of potholes and poor road surfaces is an important one. If a car hits a pothole, the driver is unlikely to be injured. If you hit a pothole on a two-wheeled vehicle the consequences are likely to be rather worse. I fell off an (unpowered) adult-sized scooter recently, and ended up with a shiner and four stitches in my head.

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2101


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: October 02, 2020, 12:21:33 »

Who is going to regulate this? I can't see the police being interested, as most traffic units have been cut almost to the point of non-existence.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: October 02, 2020, 16:27:55 »

These vehicles exist and are being used on the roads. They're not even a new invention ? I first saw one about eight years ago (being ridden up the Gloucester Rd in Bristol). All that's new is the involvement of hire companies in addition to manufacturers and retailers. The sensible thing to do is to bring all slow, small, electrically powered vehicles, regardless of configuration of wheels and seats, under one set of regulations along the lines of the Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycles (EAPC» (Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycles - webpage)) rules: 250W maximum, 25km/h cut out, no self-start, and some general fitness for purpose along the lines of BS6102 Pt1.

Legalisation would allow people to use them, or rather to carry on using them, and be covered by insurance if they cause a crash (many/most home insurance policies cover this) as well as be prosecuted for specific offences eg jumping red lights if necessary.


Edit:VickiS - Clarifying Abbreviation
« Last Edit: March 31, 2021, 11:48:19 by VickiS » Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5456


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: October 02, 2020, 17:05:18 »

Quote
E-scooter operator announced for West of England trial scheme

Residents and visitors will soon be able to get around the West of England on e-scooters after Regional Mayor Tim Bowles announced the name of the company appointed to deliver the region?s e-scooter trials.

Voi Technology Ltd will be making hop-on hop-off e-scooters available in Bristol and Bath to help residents and visitors to get around central areas. E-scooters will also be available at other key locations in South Gloucestershire such as stations, university campuses, hospitals and large employment sites.

Full article
Source: WECA» (West of England Combined Authority - about)
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page