Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
16:52 Paignton to London Paddington
17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:51 Paignton to Exmouth
17:55 Penzance to London Paddington
18:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 19:17:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[70] Taplow-Hassocks
[60] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[54] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[53] Photography at Saltash
[49] Driving tests - ongoing discussion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
Author Topic: New trains for the South West - announcement.  (Read 82450 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 30, 2015, 21:28:40 »

How much of the track west of Newbury is cleared from more than 100 mph?

Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10240



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 30, 2015, 21:52:03 »

According to the Sectional Appendix there is some 110 mph running immediately west of Newbury, through Woodborough and on the approach to Westbury.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 30, 2015, 21:54:56 »

110 mph from 53m 06ch at Newbury (through lines) to 58m 50ch just past Kintbury.

110mph from 76m 10ch to 83m 20ch and 86m 40ch to 94m 42ch between Pewsey and Westbury.

A total of just under 20^ miles of 110mph running between Newbury and Penzance.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43912



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: July 30, 2015, 22:12:44 »

110 mph from 53m 06ch at Newbury (through lines) to 58m 50ch just past Kintbury.

110mph from 76m 10ch to 83m 20ch and 86m 40ch to 94m 42ch between Pewsey and Westbury.

A total of just under 20^ miles of 110mph running between Newbury and Penzance.

So if the trains run at their full speed over those 20.75 miles ... but that's only 100 m.p.h. ...

Quote
>>> (20.75/100 - 20.75/110)*60
1.1318181818181816

They're going to take 1 minute and 7.8 seconds longer that if they were 110 m.p.h. capable and running at that speed from the very start to the very end of the section ... technically impossible because it needs acceleration and deceleration sections.  Perhaps 45 to 50 seconds, then.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2015, 22:20:54 »

More than mitigated by the improved acceleration over HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)).
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: July 31, 2015, 08:22:37 »

I think the biggest time savings will come from having power doors.  Station dwell overtime is endemic on the lines to be covered (just have a look at Realtime Time Trains for evidence of that at stations like Pewsey and Castle Cary for example).
« Last Edit: July 31, 2015, 11:49:31 by SandTEngineer » Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: July 31, 2015, 10:45:15 »

Confusded...I thought the 800s were electric & the 801s the bi-modes. Is it the other way around?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 31, 2015, 11:05:30 »

Yes.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10240



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 31, 2015, 12:39:16 »

I think the biggest time savings will come from having power doors.  Station dwell overtime is endemic on the lines to be covered (just have a look at Realtime Time Trains for evidence of that at stations like Pewsey and Castle Cary for example).

Finding a way to get non folding bikes on and off more efficiently might save some time too.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1284


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2015, 13:07:02 »

Having power doors will be a huge boon there. At present, on the Cotswold Line at least, standard procedure seems to be that the TM (Train Manager, or Ticket Machine, or Temple Meads (Bristol), depending on context) will always double-check that the Coach A bike compartment door is closed before setting off. That's a long walk from one end of the platform to another, and with it being the Cotswold Line the train's rarely on time anyway...

(I always make a point of saying "it's all closed at that end" to save them the walk.)
Logged
alan_s
Full Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2015, 17:39:32 »

I see it has been announced today the contract has been signed for the new Hitachi trains.

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/traction-rolling-stock/single-view/view/first-great-western-and-eversholt-sign-hitachi-at300-train-contract.html

What concerns me is that they are only getting 7 nine-car units and the rest (22) are only 5 car!  No wonder they want rid of the buffets if they're trying to increase capacity with 3 fewer carriages!   It'll be just like when Virgin (as it was) got rid of HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) and replaced with Voyagers!

Alan
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2015, 17:43:31 »

Errr....when necessary, 5+5=10. That's 2 longer than now
Logged
alan_s
Full Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 31, 2015, 17:56:00 »

But without an internal connection - therefore potentially one half rammed and one half almost empty.  And can you really see FGW (First Great Western) joining and splitting units as demand requires ?
Logged
Rapidash
Full Member
***
Posts: 91


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2015, 18:07:17 »

They do it on SWT (South West Trains) services to Waterloo at Salisbury ... and FGW (First Great Western) can and do reinforce Devon Metro services at EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains) if they become overcrowded.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 31, 2015, 18:26:40 »

What is it with folks aversion to new rolling stock?

Frankly I get tired of reading all this doom and gloom about rolling stock that hasn't travelled one passenger mile yet.

It may seem unfashionable to say so, but I believe train operators are best placed to know what they require in terms of providing capacity.

But no. FGW (First Great Western) obviously don't have a clue and have ordered too few trains.  Roll Eyes

Oh, and we already have a topic discussing the AT300 order.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page