Adelante_CCT
|
|
« Reply #45 on: August 24, 2015, 21:31:55 » |
|
I don't think there is a way of 'swapping' them, as you say this would require a recast of the timetable seeing as the before and after units start further north than Bristol. Another option would be have it depart around 08:00-08:05. This would have a clear path as far as Yeovil where by assuming you eliminate the 6 minutes dwell times at both Westbury and between Frome and Blatchbridge junction you would arrive at around 09:35-09:40. This would allow it to pass the 08:46 from Weymouth which in itself could be held up to an extra five minutes provided it gets to Castle Cary before the following Weymouth service. The 08:46 then has 23 minutes at Westbury giving it plenty of time to catch up to its normal path. The HST▸ would then arrive Weymouth around 10:30. Would this be an idea for future years or would a service at this time be considered too early for day trippers?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #46 on: August 24, 2015, 21:47:13 » |
|
I digress somewhat, but even if the 'all stations' became the 0909 it would appear difficult to change the timetable to allow an HST▸ to run the earlier service. At least it runs the 'right' service out of Weymouth in the evening.
Indeed ... first thing to note is that the 08:39 turns right round and heads back, passing the HST at Dorchester. Swap them over, and you end up with the HST running up and down through the day. And as you say the HST is slower overall so that it really needs to be last of a series or services, or have a bigger gap to the next one. You may also have issues with the SLC▸ and gaps in service at the hals where the HST doesn't call. Well actually I suspect it could be done. Just to have huge numbers of other ripples to sort out. And to have to be undone again come 12th September. But here's a question. How many people join that 08:39 at Temple Meads and how do they get there? The HST would then arrive Weymouth around 10:30.
Would this be an idea for future years or would a service at this time be considered too early for day trippers?
Just caught those as I posted. Intersting thought!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
bobm
|
|
« Reply #47 on: August 24, 2015, 21:50:55 » |
|
An alternative is do you, as train planners, say "Bristol already has a service to Weymouth" and look at running the HST▸ from, say, Cardiff via Bristol Parkway to Swindon and then as per the last few weeks. Gives a new journey opportunity for some and for those using Bath or Bristol Temple Meads the option of changing at Swindon or Bristol PW▸ on either the outward or inward leg.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #48 on: August 24, 2015, 22:55:14 » |
|
Weight I would imagine -doesn't an HST▸ weigh far more than a steam loco? Thus damage to old track wiuld be more if the HST ran at the same speed a steam loco is allowed?
Also, slam door HST will take longer dwell times st all stations, thus the DMU▸ will be quicker surely, given the speed restriction on the HST?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #49 on: August 24, 2015, 23:23:06 » |
|
Weight I would imagine -doesn't an HST▸ weigh far more than a steam loco? Thus damage to old track wiuld be more if the HST ran at the same speed a steam loco is allowed?
Also, slam door HST will take longer dwell times st all stations, thus the DMU▸ will be quicker surely, given the speed restriction on the HST?
I am sure the weight of a comparable steam loco would be more than the power car of an HST. If not then the out of balance load caused by the pistons would lead to the steam loco causing far more track damage. IIRC▸ the King Class were not allowed into Cornwall because they were too heavy for the Saltash Bridge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #50 on: August 25, 2015, 06:57:53 » |
|
An alternative is do you, as train planners, say "Bristol already has a service to Weymouth" and look at running the HST▸ from, say, Cardiff via Bristol Parkway to Swindon and then as per the last few weeks. Gives a new journey opportunity for some and for those using Bath or Bristol Temple Meads the option of changing at Swindon or Bristol PW▸ on either the outward or inward leg.
Except that folk from Bristol and Bath would only be able to use the Heart of Wessex Rover or split tickets. There are no permitted routes for them to Weymouth via Bristol Parkway or Melksham.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #51 on: August 25, 2015, 08:21:51 » |
|
An alternative is do you, as train planners, say "Bristol already has a service to Weymouth" and look at running the HST▸ from, say, Cardiff via Bristol Parkway to Swindon and then as per the last few weeks. Gives a new journey opportunity for some and for those using Bath or Bristol Temple Meads the option of changing at Swindon or Bristol PW▸ on either the outward or inward leg.
Except that folk from Bristol and Bath would only be able to use the Heart of Wessex Rover or split tickets. There are no permitted routes for them to Weymouth via Bristol Parkway or Melksham. Isn't a through train always valid on "any permitted" - so no issue for joiners at anywhere it stops. And it's still "via Yeovil"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #52 on: August 25, 2015, 08:49:01 » |
|
An alternative is do you, as train planners, say "Bristol already has a service to Weymouth" and look at running the HST▸ from, say, Cardiff via Bristol Parkway to Swindon and then as per the last few weeks. Gives a new journey opportunity for some and for those using Bath or Bristol Temple Meads the option of changing at Swindon or Bristol PW▸ on either the outward or inward leg.
Except that folk from Bristol and Bath would only be able to use the Heart of Wessex Rover or split tickets. There are no permitted routes for them to Weymouth via Bristol Parkway or Melksham. Isn't a through train always valid on "any permitted" - so no issue for joiners at anywhere it stops. And it's still "via Yeovil" Bob was suggesting a service from Cardiff to Weymouth via Bristol Parkway and Melksham. That wouldn't be a direct service for folk from Bristol TM‡ and Bath.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
bobm
|
|
« Reply #53 on: August 25, 2015, 08:52:55 » |
|
A couple of thoughts on the fares issue.
Speaking to one of the train managers involved he was surprised at the number of people travelling on Freedom of South West rovers (I was one).
Also if you restricted the change to just Swindon for Bath and Bristol Temple Meads that's an exclusively FGW▸ flow and there might be scope for a promotional fare if the powers that be thought there was merit in tempting people off the BRI» to WEY units in favour of the HST▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Adelante_CCT
|
|
« Reply #54 on: August 25, 2015, 11:41:44 » |
|
So if it runs via Swindon the Bristol/Bath people wouldn't be happy, and if it runs normally then the Swindon people wouldn't be happy. Also if it did run earlier per my suggestion then there wouldn't be a connection at Westbury from the first Swindon service and that really wouldn't please a few people, especially those in the Melksham area Heres a crazy suggestion that I'm sure couldn't happen for a million reasons but here we go.... As far as I'm aware the 180s aren't used at weekends, why not have one (or the future 800s) run from Bristol as normal which joins up at Westbury with another portion that's come from Swindon (Or further east perhaps, Oxford? Didcot? Paddington even???) Serves both areas and has 10cars along the busy part. SHOULD keep everyone happy.....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TeaStew
|
|
« Reply #55 on: August 25, 2015, 11:59:30 » |
|
Except those that dislike anything that isn't HST▸
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #56 on: August 25, 2015, 13:01:55 » |
|
And there's a good reason that the 180s aren't generally used at weekends
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #57 on: August 25, 2015, 17:53:06 » |
|
Heres a crazy suggestion that I'm sure couldn't happen for a million reasons but here we go.... As far as I'm aware the 180s aren't used at weekends, why not have one (or the future 800s) run from Bristol as normal which joins up at Westbury with another portion that's come from Swindon (Or further east perhaps, Oxford? Didcot? Paddington even???)
Class 180s aren't route cleared beyond Dorchester Junction, so everybody out at Dorchester West. Too early to say whether Class 800s would be cleared. But I think it unlikely that anyone will bother gauging the line between Yeovil Pen Mill and Weymouth for them. Probably will be gauged (along with the AT300s) from Castle Cary to Yeovil PM then to Yeovil Junction and down the SWML▸ to Exeter for diversionary use.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #58 on: August 25, 2015, 18:59:57 » |
|
Too early to say whether Class 800s would be cleared. But I think it unlikely that anyone will bother gauging the line between Yeovil Pen Mill and Weymouth for them. Probably will be gauged (along with the AT300s) from Castle Cary to Yeovil PM then to Yeovil Junction and down the SWML▸ to Exeter for diversionary use.
IEP▸ gauge clearance is in the CP5▸ enhancements plan as follows: Core routes ^ London to Cardiff/Swansea/Carmarthen. ^ London to Bristol/Weston Super Mare/Taunton. ^ London to Gloucester/Cheltenham. ^ London to Oxford/Worcester/Hereford. ^ London to Newbury/Westbury/Exeter/Paignton. Diversionary routes ^ Westbury to Bath Spa. ^ Gloucester to Severn Tunnel Junction. ^ Cardiff to Bridgend via Barry. ^ Castle Cary to Exeter via Yeovil. ^ Reading to Waterloo. But of course there'll now have to be a further project to gauge clear AT300 beyond Newton Abbott to Penzance - so perhaps some other previously presumed HST▸ routes will get done. Interesting that they don't intend to clear the route to Waterloo via Westbury and Salisbury - perhaps NR» have made some sort of promise that Reading will never be closed again...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PhilWakely
|
|
« Reply #59 on: August 25, 2015, 19:07:59 » |
|
Diversionary routes ^ Westbury to Bath Spa. ^ Gloucester to Severn Tunnel Junction. ^ Cardiff to Bridgend via Barry. ^ Castle Cary to Exeter via Yeovil. ^ Reading to Waterloo. What about Westbury to Chippenham via Melksham I have been on a number of diverted Exeter to Paddington HSTs▸ via the Trans-Wilts route. Diverted for any number of reasons as well as engineering work.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|