And just this week the
DVLA▸ have been vindicated in the High Court after they withdrew the right from a certain Proserve Enforcement Services to access the DVLA keeper details database. Proserve are one of those companies who allegedly 'manage' private land to prevent trespass by vehicles. The often ropey trespass 'offence' was followed by large invoices to the motorist and threats of, or actual, county court action.
Proserve are, in my opinion, just scamming chancers (no surprise that they are ex-clampers) attempting, and often succeeding, in extorting money from motorists.
The DVLA stopped Proserve form accessing the registered keeper database as they were not members of an Accredited Trade Association (ATA). Proserve appealed that decision by way of judicial review. And lost.
Background:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=93337 (long thread showing how Proserve operate and the campaign against their dubious practices)
Judgement:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2015/1605.htmlProserve now have no legitimate way to gather registered keeper details for their invoices unless they join an ATA and abide by the ATA's Code of Practice. That also means abiding by the Protection of Freedoms Act. For those reasons I'm liking the DVLA at the moment.