Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:26:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[201] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[107] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[68] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[53] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[44] senior railcard
[43] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ^40million project to fit advanced energy saving traction equipment.  (Read 4677 times)
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1269


View Profile
« on: June 07, 2015, 09:39:16 »

From http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/EnergySaving.aspx

Quote
The ^40million project between the South West Trains-Network Rail Alliance, Porterbrook and Vossloh to fit 91 Class 455 units with advanced energy saving traction equipment is well underway, with a second unit now undergoing installation at the Wimbledon Train Care Depot.

When installation is completed next year, the new equipment is expected to save ^2million in energy costs per year. This is the equivalent of the annual energy bills of more than 1,500 homes!

By my calculations these trains will need to stay in service for 20 years to recoup the outlay but I'm sure I remember reading a transcript of a customer Q & A session which suggested that these trains had another 10 years life in them which for many passengers commenting was too long and can they have something newer please? The 455 units are already 30 years old, would they work until they are 50?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2015, 11:28:26 »

Not mentioned is that the prototype is over a year late compared to original plans.

Original release here for interest:  http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/fleetinvestment.aspx

I think Modern Railways determined that the project pays for itself over a relatively short time because the reduction in 455 maintenance makes it possible to maintain the 30 unit Desiro City order at Wimbledon depot, which means that fleet doesnt incur additional depot 'space and time' costs:

Quote
An additional benefit of the new traction units is the increased mileage that can be carried out between major servicing and maintenance works, which will increase from 10,000 to 15,000 miles.   This will therefore mean that the Class 455 trains will spend less time in Wimbledon depot and more time delivering services for passengers.  A longer term benefit of this maintenance improvement will mean that space will be freed up at Wimbledon depot, enabling South West Trains to look at future capacity developments.

The other indication that it is definitely considered worthwhile for a service life of only 10 years is that Crossrail 2 will probably happen by then and take over the majority of the 455 operations anyway.

Paul
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2015, 11:31:06 »

Yes, as posted above energy saving is not the only advantage of the new traction equipment. As well as the saving in depot space and time referred to above, the re-tractioned trains should have a slightly greater availability, in effect an extra train has been obtained, perhaps two.

Each train not in the depot is another one available to reduce the number of short formations.

I suspect that these units will remain in service for longer than is planned at present, and also that electricity prices will rise, both factors that increase the viability of the work.

My only real concern is reliability, I fully accept that we cant live in the past but have seen too many cases of new technology being less reliable than old.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1269


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2015, 21:22:40 »

I have to say that it is not very often that these units have short formations on weekdays. At weekends though some of the routes will only have 4 coaches instead of the usual 8.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2015, 21:34:49 »

Part of the benefit will also be a reduction of traction load on the infrastructure ie reduces the need to increase the capacity of the substations, the regen breaking helps with this.

The main saving will be the 3ph traction motors these do not have carbon brushes therefore much less maintenance required on the units an possibly spares of some of the original electronic components may be becoming difficult the source   
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2015, 21:08:06 »

I would hope the we will see the regenerative braking working, rather than the regen breaking Smiley though I did express slight doubts re reliability.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page