That item from the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (sic) refers to, and in fact was a straight copy from,
the Telegraph. So that is presumably where the blame lies.
However, that in turn says the minister was talking to
the Times. That is not freely available online, but it did let me see the beginning of the article - dated 6th March:
Printed tickets for rail travel will be phased out within five years, according to the transport secretary.
Most passengers will use mobile phones or Oyster▸ -style smart cards to pay for journeys by the end of the next parliament, said Patrick McLoughlin.
The shift away from printed tickets, which have been a feature on the railways for 170 years, was vital to make trains more accessible, he said. The move would make flexible fares and part-time season tickets easier to operate, ending the ^complexity which makes buying a train ticket much harder than it should be^.
I thought the dailies do not usually steal each other's words, and that half-confirms it. It does still contain that bit about making travel more accessible, which I rather doubt - in the sense that many of the people most likely to find the current system confusing would find e-tickets even worse.