Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 26 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
Short Run
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
16:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:02 Westbury to Gloucester
16:08 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:30 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Great Malvern
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2025, 17:54:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[139] Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House
[82] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[77] Intoxicated person plan needed on Tube - coroner, April 2025
[56] Gloucester station needs an east-facing bay platform
[53] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[49] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: "Francis Crick Institute raises alarm about train line" - Nature 25/02/2015  (Read 4622 times)
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« on: March 04, 2015, 20:45:55 »

Quote
Francis Crick Institute raises alarm about train line

London biomedical powerhouse fears that proposed route will disrupt delicate science experiments.

A landmark addition to London^s science scene is on a collision course with the expansion of the city^s transport system. The Francis Crick Institute warns that vibrations and electromagnetic fields generated by Crossrail 2, a proposed railway line that would skirt the institute, could interfere with scientific work there. The teams behind both efforts are now seeking a solution.

continues
http://www.nature.com/news/francis-crick-institute-raises-alarm-about-train-line-1.16978

An interesting situation.  I have long wondered why this location was chosen for the facility.  There are plenty of science research institutes located outside major cities which do some excellent research, without being constrained by nearby construction and the limited space available to build.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19570



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2015, 00:16:28 »

Hmm.

The Long Ashton Research Station was a sizeable site, alongside the main line between Bristol and ... well, Nailsea  Roll Eyes  until it was closed down and the land sold off for no doubt very lucrative residential developments.  I'm not sure that 'vibrations and electromagnetic fields' were considerations foremost in the minds of the powers that be at the time.  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2015, 16:53:27 »


An interesting situation.  I have long wondered why this location was chosen for the facility.  There are plenty of science research institutes located outside major cities which do some excellent research, without being constrained by nearby construction and the limited space available to build.

Because London wants a bit of the action when it comes to biomedical research.  It is being heavily pushed by Boris and the London Development Agency or whatever it is called.  Not that that is a bad thing.  London is a good place for biomed research (I declare an interest here in that I work in the biotech patent industry for a firm with a London Office)
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2015, 19:21:04 »

What a curious concern. The Institute is already only metres away from St. Pancras with all its 25kV wiring and the Thameslink tunnel is almost underneath. The sub-surface lines are only the other side of the British Library. What difference will Crossrail 2 make?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7426


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2015, 20:14:38 »

What a curious concern. The Institute is already only metres away from St. Pancras with all its 25kV wiring and the Thameslink tunnel is almost underneath. The sub-surface lines are only the other side of the British Library. What difference will Crossrail 2 make?

That's exactly what struck me. A twin-track railway deep underground, using 25 kV AC, can't be hugely worse than a big station next door or a sub-surface line using 750 V (bigger currents) and DC (Direct Current) (harder to screen). Worth doing the sums, but if it does threaten to upset the machines then shoot the Crick's designers, not Crossrail's planners (who say they can build in a bit more screening just to be helpful anyway).
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page