Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
 No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]		 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr
Train RunningCancelled
16:52 Paignton to London Paddington
17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:51 Paignton to Exmouth
17:55 Penzance to London Paddington
18:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
•
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
•
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
•
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
•
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
•
Train companiesSelect from:
GWR
SWR
XC
Chiltern
TfL
TfW
WMR
Southern
• Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple Meads • Bath Spa • Chippenham • Swindon • Didcot Parkway • Reading • London Paddington • Melksham
Exeter St Davids • Taunton • Westbury • Trowbridge • Bristol Parkway • Cardiff Central • Oxford • Cheltenham Spa • Birmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 19:17:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[70] Taplow-Hassocks
[60] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[54] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[53] Photography at Saltash
[49] Driving tests - ongoing discussion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Great Western Coffee Shop > All across the Great Western territory > The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom > First Hull Trains - contract extended
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: First Hull Trains - contract extended  (Read 3280 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43912



View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 21, 2015, 11:14:37 »
http://www.kcfm.co.uk/news/local-news/first-hull-trains-contract-on-london-route-extended/?/

Quote
First Hull Trains have got an extension on their contract to run services from Hull to London Kings Cross.

It means they'll operate the route at least until 2019.

Earlier this month, the company announced they're launching a direct service from Beverley to London.

It's as the company's reporting strong growth in the number of passenger numbers, which grew 6.7% last year - well above the industry average.

That reads to me as if they have been awarded a contract by a funder to carry on until 2019, but I understood them to be an open access (commercial) operator.  Is the extended contract their own agreement with Network Rail to continue to allow them train paths - that's not how it reads to me!
Logged
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2015, 11:26:05 »
Nor me - but that's the press for you. Your assumption is correct - they have extended *their* contract with NR» (Network Rail - home page) to 2019 as a open-access operator.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2015, 11:47:59 »
Meanwhile over on the West Coast we have the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) still saying no to GNWR. Despite the paths being available.

Their reason is the services being proposed would be revenue extractive from franchised TOCs▸ (Train Operating Company). Why is that okay on the East Coast but not the West?
Logged
"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2015, 11:58:27 »
Hmm - it was Virgin that objected strongly to GNWR on the West Coast. Now they have shares in the East Coast, what's the betting they go after Hull Trains? Already proposing some services that are sure to revenue abstract from them. Possibly why Hull Trains moved to extend their contract?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1114


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2015, 18:58:20 »
It was Virgin who paid to the very successful and popular Wrexham & Shropshire railway.

Following the failure to upgrade the WCML▸ (West Coast Main Line) as was originally proposed Virgin got an anti-competition clause added to their contract for the WCML as compensation.  Basically Branson has a licence to print money on that route.  Another fine example of the mess the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have made of privatisation and franchising
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2015, 19:36:55 »
The moderation of competition clauses were not carried over into Virgin's current franchise, the latest objections to GNWR have been from ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) on revenue abstraction grounds, not from Virgin.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2015, 20:40:41 »
Also, it wasn't Virgin who put paid to W&SMR - the latter 'persuaded' Chiltern to let them cover a Chiltern service or two. As soon as that method of funding was ruled out of order, the plug was pulled.

It never made money
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of page • Jump to Forum Home Page