Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Delayed
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:15:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[49] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[49] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[45] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[44] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
[41] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 20
  Print  
Author Topic: Quiet Carriage / Coach: restrictions and issues - ongoing discussion, merged topic  (Read 112530 times)
Westernchallenger
Full Member
***
Posts: 33


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: January 31, 2008, 14:56:55 »

That's what I meant to say! But NX should be commended for offering the choice of accommodation inc airline/table, face/back, near toilets/not and of course quiet coach! What I would like to know is how the Trainline booking engine, which I believe is behind pretty well all of the various TOC (Train Operating Company) fronts, allocates seats? In particular, now that NX ask if you want to select the quiet coach, are reservations only made in coach B on NXEC (National Express East Coast) when this is the case?

One particular problem on GW (Great Western) is where people travelling on advance purchase tickets are allocated reservations in coach A when they didn't ask for it.   
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 554



View Profile
« Reply #46 on: January 31, 2008, 18:23:38 »

I smoke. I hate mobile phones.

As a smoker who has had to adapt to 5 hour journeys between Paddington & Cornwall sans cigarette, I frequently have the fantasy of lighting up and blowing smoke right in the faces of anyone using a mobile phone inconsiderately on the train. Two wrongs don't make a right, I know, but I'd takel a perverse pleasure in the fact that that I was pissing them off with my smoke pollution as much as they were me with their noise pollution.

Imo ALL coaches should be mobile-free. If people want to use them, they should go between the coaches and be grateful; smokers don't even have that option.

While in griping mode, the arrogance of people who litter public spaces, such as trains, without any thought for fellow users or those who have to clean up after them, drives me ballistic, too.



 
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: January 31, 2008, 18:28:50 »

Mobile Phones don't cause cancer though do they (not according to the official research at least)

Sitting in a smokey carriage would be awful whereas somebody on the mobile isn't really affecting everybody and causing them health problems.

Personally I think smoking should be banned totally as it is perhaps the most selfish thing you can do, how many non smokers want to 'enjoy' (Huh) other peoples smoke fumes in public!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: January 31, 2008, 19:21:26 »

I smoke. I hate mobile phones.

As a smoker who has had to adapt to 5 hour journeys between Paddington & Cornwall sans cigarette, I frequently have the fantasy of lighting up and blowing smoke right in the faces of anyone using a mobile phone inconsiderately on the train. Two wrongs don't make a right, I know, but I'd takel a perverse pleasure in the fact that that I was pissing them off with my smoke pollution as much as they were me with their noise pollution.

Imo ALL coaches should be mobile-free. If people want to use them, they should go between the coaches and be grateful; smokers don't even have that option.

While in griping mode, the arrogance of people who litter public spaces, such as trains, without any thought for fellow users or those who have to clean up after them, drives me ballistic, too.



 


Ok, I agree that moblies should be banned from passenger saloons, but banning smoking in trains is good!

Why not try and give up, using the 5hr journey to help you.

Or of course, you could do a Charles Kennedy and smoke out of the window at 125mph!
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 554



View Profile
« Reply #49 on: January 31, 2008, 19:43:23 »

The jury's still out on whether or not there's a link between mobiles and cancer but that debate (and the one about banning smoking totally) is not the point here: even back when smoking was allowed, it was only allowed in a designated smoking carriage. I accept the ban on smoking in trains and that's all that matters here.
 
My point was that in a confined public space, mobile use is selfish and annoying. It's not just the damn mobiles going off and disturbing people from working or sleeping but the often lengthy high-volume conversations people have too.

 
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: January 31, 2008, 23:35:02 »

The new National Express East Coast website allows you to make a number of choices when booking a seat including quiet coach. NX also don't charge a booking fee unlike the Trainline.

thetrainline doesn't charge a booknig fee. It charges a transaction fee on credit cards. use a debit card and it's free Wink

OK maybe they do now, I'll just book with virgin instead
Logged
jane s
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: February 27, 2008, 14:46:47 »

Just seen this on the FGW (First Great Western) website! Looks like they are paying attention.....

"What plans does FGW have to improve the signage and announcements in quiet coaches to make it easier for the train manager, and other passengers, to ask customers using mobile telephones, listening to audible personal stereos etc or generally making a lot of noise to desist, cease or otherwise stop their anti-social activities.
There used to be distinctive anti-macassars (now removed), posters at ends of coaches (also removed) and fairly prominent window labels (now  smaller).....   A large sign at the coach entrance might also help too."

"We carried out some robust customer research on this during January, the aim being to get some definitive feedback from customers to help us redefine the policy. The policy as it stands is very outdated and does not really address the main concerns, i.e. noise and distraction. There has been more emphasis on what technological equipment can't be used, but technology has changed (ipods, pdas, blackberries, laptops - none of which is addressed in the policy), and unlike people chatting, the use of some of it does not necessarily make noise (i.e. texting to say you may be late). Once we really understand the core concerns, then we can understand what the policy should/not allow and what needs to be communicated.   We expect the policy will make more emphasis on noise volumes. In the mean time we're looking at improving the labelling and posters in the carriages.
Lisa Sampson, Leisure Segment Manager - Marketing"
Logged
miniman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 103


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: February 27, 2008, 15:04:27 »

Would also be nice if they turned down the volume on the PA (Public Address) announcements in the quiet coaches!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: February 27, 2008, 18:09:11 »

Probably not feasable due to safety/fact some people are hard of hearing anyway.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: February 27, 2008, 19:16:15 »

Quote
but technology has changed (ipods, pdas, blackberries, laptops - none of which is addressed in the policy

Maybe FGW (First Great Western) should try reading their own website, the following extract from which appears to cover all electronic devices perfectly well.

Quote
We ask that people who sit in the Quiet Carriage respect other passengers and:
Use their mobile phones in the vestibule and not in the carriage and keep them on silent throughout the journey.
Do not listen to personal stereos or other electronic equipment such as portable DVD players.
Keep all other electronic equipment such as laptops and portable games consoles on silent.
Talk quietly when talking to other passengers. 
This way those that wish to have a peaceful, relaxing journey may do so.

Given that a person with a personal stereo usually doesn't know, nor care, what it sounds like to anyone around them, I find the idea of any switch to an "emphasis on noise volumes" worrying. These things should just be banned outright in quiet carriages, full stop.

The present policy, outlined above, seems perfectly adequate, if only FGW could be bothered to provide clearly visible signs and special antimacassars again - as well as some of those little stickers below the windows which most Adelantes also had in coach A - and get train crews to: a. Consistently announce the policy on the PA (Public Address); b. Actively police it when they are in coaches A and G - too many staff simply ignore phones going off, nor do they often deal with Jane's original bugbear, the group of people who just won't shut up, and who, like personal stereo users, don't care about the volume or those sitting around them.

And why did it take until January to look at this properly? I gave them feedback about the lack of adequate notices after my first trip on a refurbished 125 many months ago, and can't imagine I was alone. Nor can I imagine I was the only one who was, frankly, fobbed off with a load of waffle.
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #55 on: February 27, 2008, 19:17:12 »

They could at least install overhead indicators at the end of the carriages (as many suburban trains have) showing the routine safety announcements and next and subsequent stops. The PA (Public Address) could be used for apologies about being stuck behind slow running trains and requests to remove baggage from seats. That would at least cut down the number of intrusive announcements that are made throughout the journey.
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #56 on: February 27, 2008, 19:33:56 »

Quote
but technology has changed (ipods, pdas, blackberries, laptops - none of which is addressed in the policy

Maybe FGW (First Great Western) should try reading their own website, the following extract from which appears to cover all electronic devices perfectly well.

Quote
We ask that people who sit in the Quiet Carriage respect other passengers and:
Use their mobile phones in the vestibule and not in the carriage and keep them on silent throughout the journey.
Do not listen to personal stereos or other electronic equipment such as portable DVD players.
Keep all other electronic equipment such as laptops and portable games consoles on silent.
Talk quietly when talking to other passengers. 
This way those that wish to have a peaceful, relaxing journey may do so.

I have headphones for my personal stereo designed not to emit noise other than to me - they werent cheap mind

But - I would object if I were told to stop using it because iPods were not allowed.

No one can heat mine (not that I use it often like)
Given that a person with a personal stereo usually doesn't know, nor care, what it sounds like to anyone around them, I find the idea of any switch to an "emphasis on noise volumes" worrying. These things should just be banned outright in quiet carriages, full stop.

The present policy, outlined above, seems perfectly adequate, if only FGW could be bothered to provide clearly visible signs and special antimacassars again - as well as some of those little stickers below the windows which most Adelantes also had in coach A - and get train crews to: a. Consistently announce the policy on the PA (Public Address); b. Actively police it when they are in coaches A and G - too many staff simply ignore phones going off, nor do they often deal with Jane's original bugbear, the group of people who just won't shut up, and who, like personal stereo users, don't care about the volume or those sitting around them.

And why did it take until January to look at this properly? I gave them feedback about the lack of adequate notices after my first trip on a refurbished 125 many months ago, and can't imagine I was alone. Nor can I imagine I was the only one who was, frankly, fobbed off with a load of waffle.

Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #57 on: February 27, 2008, 19:34:35 »

When I'm on my iPod touch in a quiet coach, I generally ensure I'm sat out of the way and that I can hear the train easily over the music. I normally find this a good measure as to whether others can hear my music.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19072


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #58 on: February 27, 2008, 22:12:03 »

Would also be nice if they turned down the volume on the PA (Public Address) announcements in the quiet coaches!

Actually, I agree with that. While the PA announcements have to compete with all the other background noise in other carriages, there's much less noise in the quiet carriages, so surely there's no need for the announcements to be quite so loud?

 Undecided
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: February 27, 2008, 23:38:08 »

Okay Mookiemoo and Tom, there are some considerate travellers out there, the point is, there are many who aren't and couldn't give a damn about anyone else, and they are the ones who cause the problems.

Once you try to introduce shades of grey into the concept of the quiet coach, you might as well not bother, which I find a pretty depressing thought, since these people already have run of the rest of the train.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page