Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:55 10 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - BRTA Westbury
today - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 10th May

Train RunningCancelled
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
18:05 London Paddington to Newbury
18:12 Reading to Newbury
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:15 Newbury to Reading
19:56 Taunton to London Paddington
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Short Run
12:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:30 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
15:28 Carmarthen to London Paddington
15:48 Penzance to Plymouth
16:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 17:02 Westbury to Fareham
17:36 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
17:37 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
17:48 Bristol Parkway to Bristol Temple Meads
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:43 Cardiff Central to Weston-Super-Mare
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 10, 2025, 18:06:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] Day trip to Chetnole - and a walk to Maiden Newton - report an...
[93] New road bridge over River Clyde opens to traffic - May 2025
[64] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[46] Edinburgh: Repairs to historic North Bridge delayed again to 2...
[40] Posting news items from the press / broadcast media on the Cof...
[38] Diary Of A Reasonably Frequent Rail User
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 550259 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4535


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #360 on: September 07, 2016, 07:16:47 »

... quite probable, I had thought about it being the 800s, although vaguely ruled it out with the near daily test runs they have been doing between North Pole and Bristol at the moment. Seems pointless to limit runs to such a short section when longer ones are currently being done, but makes sense if its for driver training purposes.

The test runs will at some stage start run during the day under electric power between Reading and Didcot possibly as part of Driver training.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13356


View Profile Email
« Reply #361 on: September 07, 2016, 09:58:22 »

he current 387 diagrams are thus -

Here are the diagrams:
 
 Diagram 1
 2S07 0718 HAY-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) 0740
 2S48 1718 PAD-HAY 1739
 5S52 1741 HAY-PAD 1841
 2S52 1848 PAD-HAY 1909
 2S53 1924 HAY-PAD 1944
 
 Diagram 2
 2S09 0715 PAD HAY 0733
 2S10 0748 HAY PAD 0810
 2S56 1915 PAD HAY 1936
 2S57 1954 HAY PAD 2014
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4535


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #362 on: September 07, 2016, 21:13:08 »

he current 387 diagrams are thus -

Here are the diagrams:
 
 Diagram 1
 2S07 0718 HAY-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) 0740
 2S48 1718 PAD-HAY 1739
 5S52 1741 HAY-PAD 1841
 2S52 1848 PAD-HAY 1909
 2S53 1924 HAY-PAD 1944
 
 Diagram 2
 2S09 0715 PAD HAY 0733
 2S10 0748 HAY PAD 0810
 2S56 1915 PAD HAY 1936
 2S57 1954 HAY PAD 2014

Steady on .......... with such an intensive diagrams as these the units will get worn out  Grin   Grin

Did see them out and about today
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10462


View Profile
« Reply #363 on: September 07, 2016, 21:31:25 »

Don't think enough drivers are passed out to run any more at the moment!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1279


View Profile
« Reply #364 on: September 08, 2016, 21:31:37 »

Don't think enough drivers are passed out to run any more at the moment!

Do they have to be passed out? Wouldn't a healthy wide awake driver be better on this route?
Logged
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1563


View Profile
« Reply #365 on: September 08, 2016, 21:38:57 »

Think it is more likely to be the passengers who will 'pass out' at the sight of a shiny new train...but they will soon recover their equilibrium when they find out it's not long enough......
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 646


View Profile
« Reply #366 on: September 08, 2016, 21:58:07 »

No danger tonight of anyone passing out at the sight of these trains as according to Realtimetrains both diagrams were cancelled.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4535


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #367 on: September 10, 2016, 09:40:35 »

Don't think enough drivers are passed out to run any more at the moment!

Do they have to be passed out? Wouldn't a healthy wide awake driver be better on this route?

Totally different form of traction, the acceleration and breaking is totally different to the turbos. 
The drives need to know what ADD (Automatic Dropping Device) is,
What to do at Neutral Sections
The breaking is totally different to a turbo the 387 have regen breaking.   
All the emergency systems are different, the location of rests and equipment isolation are all different.
The coupling / uncoupling of units is very different. 
Also 387 have incab monitors for DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard))


The drivers being trained are already highly skilled so will pick it up very quickly and I am sure are looking forward to the challenge of learning the new units

(ADD - automatic dropping device a safety system associated with the pantographs)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #368 on: September 10, 2016, 11:52:48 »

Looks as if the Class 387 drags to Reading Depot using Class 57s have been pencilled in to be used when required as follows:
TWThO from December 13th onwards
0R87 09:09 OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) to West Ealing Loop (Class 57)
5R87 10:00 West Ealing Loop to Reading TD (Class 57/387)
5G87 12:21 Reading TD to West Ealing Loop (Class 57/387)
0G87 14:32 West Ealing Loop to OOC (Class 57)
Logged
The Tall Controller
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 365


View Profile
« Reply #369 on: September 10, 2016, 14:18:16 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have recently purchased a couple of additional 57s. Presumably to do 387 drags.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #370 on: September 10, 2016, 16:51:41 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have recently purchased a couple of additional 57s. Presumably to do 387 drags.
Can they also stand in when the Sleeper loco breaks down?
Logged
The Tall Controller
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 365


View Profile
« Reply #371 on: September 10, 2016, 21:08:24 »

Providing the breakdown is in the London area and doesn't has an impact on getting the 387s out the next morning then it should be possible.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5348


View Profile
« Reply #372 on: September 12, 2016, 10:54:10 »

New unit 387136 reported elsewhere delivered to North Pole last night.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10462


View Profile
« Reply #373 on: September 12, 2016, 19:37:00 »

Took my first trip today.  Very impressed with the trains, the best Class 377/387 interior in my opinion.

However I was very unimpressed to see several people left behind at West Ealing when the Greenford shuttle left on time despite people visibly running down the platform to try and connect with it having alighted from a slightly delayed Hayes service.  A 5 minute connection hold policy should be enforced as the goodwill of commuters from the Greenford branch needs to be maintained as they have ended up worse off as a result of these changes.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #374 on: September 12, 2016, 20:48:44 »

I'm guessing you are referring to the 19:15 then II? as the 17:18/18:48 services aren't suppose to connect, if that is the case then yes, it really should wait, especially as it then has a 30 minute wait at West Ealing on its next trip back.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page