Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
16:52 Paignton to London Paddington
17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
14:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
15:45 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:36 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:48 Bristol Temple Meads to Castle Cary
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
18:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 17:49:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[70] Taplow-Hassocks
[60] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[54] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[53] Photography at Saltash
[49] Driving tests - ongoing discussion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9
  Print  
Author Topic: SDO............why the discrepancies  (Read 42082 times)
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #60 on: January 23, 2008, 20:11:22 »

I'm pretty sure it's profit first, safety second if and when they can get away with it.

Quite right there!
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #61 on: January 23, 2008, 20:21:47 »

Definitely profits first!

Or does safety come under the profits band (amount of compensation they have to pay out)?

The compensation culture we have is the only reason anyone cares about Health and Safety, FGW (First Great Western) included!

That's why the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) have locks- really, how many (sane/not stupid) people are going to open and lean out of a window when at 125 mph and fiddle with the door handle?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: January 23, 2008, 20:32:47 »

The fact is that before the central locking was introduced there was a steady stream of fatalities due to people falling out of Mk 3 coaches at speed. It was never explained why, but it stopped once the central locking was installed.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19574



View Profile Email
« Reply #63 on: January 23, 2008, 21:02:12 »

Agreed, John - and IIRC ('if I recall/remember/read correctly') part of the problem was that the door could be opened by a handle on the inside - where that shiny steel blanking plate was fitted, when central locking was introduced?
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: January 23, 2008, 21:05:45 »

No Chris, they've never been openable (if that's a verb) from the inside. So it was always a mystery as to how someone could lean out and open the door from the outside at speed. But it happened often enough for the conclusion to be drawn that it needed addressing. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19574



View Profile Email
« Reply #65 on: January 23, 2008, 21:11:20 »

Thanks, John: in that case, a mystery indeed!  But I don't have a problem with central locking per se - just with the way it's being applied perversely with SDO (Selective Door Opening), for example at Nailsea!
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: January 23, 2008, 21:37:45 »



 HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) Doors have never ever been openable from the inside, there were two types of lock fitted to slam door rolling stock the type with the openable handle fron the inside was a single acting lock and was only ever fitted to innersuburban commuter stock
The type fitted to HSTs is the only one now in service and this is a double acting lock which has a two stage catch to prevent people falling out if they should try to open the door when the train is moving,and thus you have always had to open the window to operate the door handle
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19574



View Profile Email
« Reply #67 on: January 23, 2008, 21:45:58 »

Thanks to you, too, dog box: my memory is obviously more dodgy than I thought!  Wink

However, in view of the fairly comprehensive security of such a lock, it is indeed a mystery how anyone could bypass it, while travelling at high speed?

Or is this a case of, "nothing can be made foolproof, because fools are so ingenious!"  Undecided
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #68 on: January 23, 2008, 21:48:55 »

Thanks to you, too, dog box: my memory is obviously more dodgy than I thought!  Wink

However, in view of the fairly comprehensive security of such a lock, it is indeed a mystery how anyone could bypass it, while travelling at high speed?

Or is this a case of, "nothing can be made foolproof, because fools are so ingenious!"  Undecided

Or could it be that slam doors were outlawed because of the issues that happened on the commuter services that had different locks

And no one bothered to make the effort to specify that FGW (First Great Western) style locks are ok - saw it as an opportunity to outlaw all slam doors unless there was centra locking
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: January 23, 2008, 21:52:35 »

Thanks to you, too, dog box: my memory is obviously more dodgy than I thought!  Wink

However, in view of the fairly comprehensive security of such a lock, it is indeed a mystery how anyone could bypass it, while travelling at high speed?

Or is this a case of, "nothing can be made foolproof, because fools are so ingenious!"  Undecided

Or could it be that slam doors were outlawed because of the issues that happened on the commuter services that had different locks

And no one bothered to make the effort to specify that FGW (First Great Western) style locks are ok - saw it as an opportunity to outlaw all slam doors unless there was centra locking
CDL (Central Door Locking) (central door locks) were only fitted to the HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) style locks, all of the old slam door DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s and EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)'s never had any form of door locks fitted, that is apart from the Arriva "bubble car" and the Chiltern "bubble car" which have a strange electro-magnet type CDL. However, at the time, it was not expected for the DMU's and EMU's to be in service for much longer.
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: January 23, 2008, 22:08:03 »

The single acting lock was fitted to mK1 Stock and i think that mk2/3 were fitted with the double acting type when new. many mk1s were converted to the newer type.
Regulations dictated all slam doors needed to be locked, mk2/3 were fitted with central door locking ,whilst mk1 vehicles would have been expensive to do and thus as Mookiemoo states only a handful were ever done
All new type trains 170 /5 etc are built with Sdo and thus Hsts now have it to ensure they meet modern regs
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: January 24, 2008, 20:26:38 »

I'm pretty sure it's profit first, safety second if and when they can get away with it.

Utter nonsence  Roll Eyes

You got a bad memory?
Remember the Southall Crash?
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: January 24, 2008, 20:42:33 »

The fact is that before the central locking was introduced there was a steady stream of fatalities due to people falling out of Mk 3 coaches at speed. It was never explained why, but it stopped once the central locking was installed.

The Boffins at the RTC (Railway Techincal Centre) DID (Didcot Parkway) get to the bottom of it.

Carriages where fatalities had occured with persons falling from a moving train, were examined in detail and NO FAULT with the door locks or catches could be found.

However rolling stock suffer from Stress, Expansion and Air Pressures, and the faster the speed the greater the effect.
It was found by lasar measurment that carriages twist and deflect with the shocks coming from the wheels and bogies, along with heat expansion and the lower air pressure outside a train at high speeds.
It was found that with this twisting action the gap between the door lock and striker plate could increase, and in a very few cases it was enough to allow the door lock to move past the striker plate and, bang the door would fly open by air pressure.

That is the reason Secondary Door locks operate at Right Angles to the Door Handle lock.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: January 24, 2008, 21:05:13 »

Well thank you. I never knew that.
Logged
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #74 on: January 24, 2008, 21:53:01 »

I'm pretty sure it's profit first, safety second if and when they can get away with it.

Utter nonsence  Roll Eyes

You got a bad memory?
Remember the Southall Crash?
Do you really remeber it?
If so, which company was involved carrying passengers?
(No one else answer, I want Smokey to answer)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page