Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:15 21 Apr 2025
 
- RAF jets intercept Russian aircraft near Nato airspace
* Gatwick worst airport in UK for flight delays
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
21st Apr (1958)
Battery Multiple Unit enters public service (link)

Train RunningCancelled
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
05:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
05:47 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
05:53 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
05:58 Westbury to Cardiff Central
06:01 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
06:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
06:28 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
06:44 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
06:57 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
06:59 Westbury to Cardiff Central
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
07:20 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
07:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
08:00 Cardiff Central to Plymouth
08:19 Taunton to Cardiff Central
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
09:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
09:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
09:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
10:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
10:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
10:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
10:52 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
11:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
14:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
15:15 Taunton to Cardiff Central
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
17:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:15 Taunton to Cardiff Central
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
22:00 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 21, 2025, 02:26:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[157] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[93] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[56] Salisbury Station, 2025 edition
[53] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
[48] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[47] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Chiltern Plans Longer Trains  (Read 9054 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13328


View Profile Email
« on: November 03, 2014, 16:54:11 »

From Rail

Quote
Using Class 68s will enable Chiltern Railways to operate longer trains, the company^s managing director Rob Brighouse has told RAIL. He said the current fleet of Class 67s hired from DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) Schenker were ^at their limit^ regarding what they could haul, and that a ^68^ could haul more than that, suggesting that the trains could increase in length to perhaps eight Mk 3s.He said the hiring of the ^68s^ was about capacity, as they would enable Chiltern to improve the performance of trains through better acceleration.
Logged
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2014, 17:25:41 »


But where would the additional Mk3 coaches come from? FGW (First Great Western) has said in the past that it has obtained all the available Mk3 coaches.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2014, 17:42:17 »

But where would the additional Mk3 coaches come from? FGW (First Great Western) has said in the past that it has obtained all the available Mk3 coaches.

Perhaps that was referring more to Mk 3 HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) coaches.  Mk3 HST and Mk3 local hauled coaches are not electrically compatible.   

Chiltern might already have access to other Mk3 coaches that are yet to be refurbished for service?

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2014, 18:15:55 »

The Pretendolino rake was withdrawn a few days ago so that releases a handful of serviceable Mk 3s.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13328


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2014, 18:38:46 »

Chiltern own at least a dozen Mk3s....sitting at the MOd depot in Kineton.

In a pretty poor state, but yes, they already own them
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2014, 19:02:37 »

If I remember correctly Chiltern owns about ten or a dozen loco hauled Mk 3 coaches which are still stored somewhere. (Kineton?) The plan was (is?) to convert them when required with retention toilets and power doors - there are enough to make one new train and extend the others to 6 coaches while still leaving some maintenance spares.

So, strictly, fGW is correct in that they have all the HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) Mk 3s which are available at a reasonable price. I think the only spare HST Mk3 coaches are a few catering coaches but these would need some significant, i.e., expensive, work to convert them to seating coaches. Loco-hauled Mk 3s have auxiliary power supplied off the single phase ac/dc ETH supply, the HSTs use a 415v variable frequency three-phase supply off the auxiliary alternator in the power cars so any conversion from loco-hauled to HST is also non trivial.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2014, 22:41:31 »

Perhaps with the 170s they are pinching from TPE (Trans Pennine Express), Chiltern will no longer need the Banbury commuter slam-door rake of mrk3s? Those vehicles could then be given the Silver-Set treatment (power doors etc.) to lengthen the existing Silver-Sets.

I'm not sure I should believe this new reason for Chiltern switching to class 68s though. 67s unable to pull more coaches? Maybe I've misread that 67s are used as ECML (East Coast Main Line) Thunderbirds (if they can haul a 2+9 IC225 or IC125 set, they should be able to shift 8 mark 3s and a DVT (Driving Van Trailer (carriage) or Deep Vein Thrombosis, depending on context)). I thought when it was first announced Chiltern's reason for wanting 68s was improved fuel ecconomy compared to 67s. Maybe a 68 can out-accelerate a 67 though.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2014, 23:41:46 »

i understand from fairly reliable sources that the general concensus is that a 67 couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding and are very sluggish accelerating.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2014, 07:13:05 »

i understand from fairly reliable sources that the general concensus is that a 67 couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding and are very sluggish accelerating.

Yes, but even more importantly they are very unreliable.  When you rely on just one power source for a train it causes huge problems when there's a failure - one of the main benefits modern units have over loco hauled trains.

Chiltern will no doubt be hoping for much better reliability from their 68s.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13328


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2014, 09:05:43 »

Perhaps with the 170s they are pinching from TPE (Trans Pennine Express), Chiltern will no longer need the Banbury commuter slam-door rake of mrk3s? Those vehicles could then be given the Silver-Set treatment (power doors etc.) to lengthen the existing Silver-Sets.

Strictly speaking, they're not pinching them. They completed a contract with TPE, and were leased from the end of that contract by Chiltern, prior to TPE being able to re-contract them past their then franchise end date...Chiltern did nowt wrong, the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) didn't move quick enough to assist TPE in releasing them.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page