Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:55 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:15:01 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Gw electrification - where can I get a summary of plans?  (Read 19168 times)
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« on: September 27, 2014, 15:30:15 »

Hi all - I'm trying to get a summary of when electrical ion will be completed on certain routes and how far these extend - where can I find this?

For example..

London <> Oxford (and anywhere else past this)
London <> South wales
London <> South west

I appreciate the common factor here us London<> reading

This has cone about because in one of the local facebook groups for newbury someone has posted a picture of electrification work starting and there seems to be confusion about how far west it was going.

I seem to remember this being discussed in another thread and issues bring no discussed about electrical feeds etc

Thanks for your help
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7371


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2014, 15:44:13 »

From the CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) enhancements Delivery Plan, dates for GRIP (Guide to Railway Investment Projects) 6 completion (Infrastructure ready to use):

Maidenhead to Newbury, Oxford, Chippenham (incl.) and Bristol Parkway   December 2016
Chippenham (excl) to Bristol Temple MeadsMay 2017
Bristol Temple Meads and Bristol Parkway to Cardiff   December 2017
Cardiff (excl.) to SwanseaMay 2018
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2014, 15:49:51 »

Great - exactly what I needed - many thanks

Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7371


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2014, 20:16:40 »

The document was published in March 2014, by the way. And a note of warning; the dates are "indicative", and under the tables the jargon-speaking weasels have inserted: "It should be noted that an efficient profiling workstream is considering all electrification projects and the outcome of this workstream may result in reprofiling the delivery dates of some electrification projects.". No, I don't know what that means either.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2014, 21:25:43 »

The document was published in March 2014, by the way. And a note of warning; the dates are "indicative", and under the tables the jargon-speaking weasels have inserted: "It should be noted that an efficient profiling workstream is considering all electrification projects and the outcome of this workstream may result in reprofiling the delivery dates of some electrification projects.". No, I don't know what that means either.

Blimey - I thought IT project jargon was bad Smiley
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2014, 21:38:39 »

The same dates are shown in the June version of the CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) enhancement milestones, but there should be a quarterly update online soon.

(By the way if anyone is familiar with the way they left all the superseded versions on the website during CP4 (Control Period 4 - the five year period between 2009 and 2014), allowing for easy comparisons, it looks as if they are not doing so this time.   I'm going to try and keep a copy each time they change it, so I can look back and see how delays are gradually amended in, and project scope is surreptitiously reduced over the years.)

Paul
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2014, 21:47:22 »

The document was published in March 2014, by the way. And a note of warning; the dates are "indicative", and under the tables the jargon-speaking weasels have inserted: "It should be noted that an efficient profiling workstream is considering all electrification projects and the outcome of this workstream may result in reprofiling the delivery dates of some electrification projects.". No, I don't know what that means either.

That's a definite candidate for Pseuds Corner in Private EyeRoll Eyes
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2014, 21:53:31 »

Didn't they do a study into extending the wires beyond Newbury. It came back as not being worth extending the wires to Westbury, but didn't a shorter extension (Bedwyn rings a bell, but I'm not sure) prove worthwhile? Not sure that further extension was actually committed to though.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2014, 21:54:41 »

Didn't they do a study into extending the wires beyond Newbury. It came back as not being worth extending the wires to Westbury, but didn't a shorter extension (Bedwyn rings a bell, but I'm not sure) prove worthwhile? Not sure that further extension was actually committed to though.

That's what I thought - thanks for checking commenting
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2014, 09:25:06 »

Was considered, but seems to have been ruled out:

http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/11305367.MP_horrified_as_Bedwyn_and_Pewsey_ruled_out_of_electrification/

I wonder how many cruise missiles we can fire at Iraq with the money saved?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2014, 10:13:57 »


I wonder how many cruise missiles we can fire at Iraq with the money saved?

The two are completely unconnected, so probably better not to widen the discussion beyond transport matters.
Logged
ironstone11
Full Member
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2014, 20:14:14 »


The lady pictured in the link, Claire Perry, is now the Rail Minister.  To quote Roger Ford from Modern Railways
Quote
I^d put her in my Top 10 of  ^Ministers I have known^, for industry knowledge and approachability.

So perhaps common sense will prevail.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2014, 20:41:09 »

The answer to the Newbury - Bedwyn wires question depends very much on whether you electrify what is necessary to maintain the exact current service pattern, or if you alter the service pattern to fit the future extent of electrification.

As we may have discussed before...

Paul
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2014, 20:47:21 »

The answer to the Newbury - Bedwyn wires question depends very much on whether you electrify what is necessary to maintain the exact current service pattern, or if you alter the service pattern to fit the future extent of electrification.

As we may have discussed before...

Paul

Yes Paul I think you are right Smiley
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2014, 21:04:24 »

I suppose the question is if there current service pattern had not already been in place is that what you would do?

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page