Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:27:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[201] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[107] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[68] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[53] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[44] senior railcard
[43] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW fail to make the accessibility charts !  (Read 3419 times)
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1541


View Profile
« on: July 03, 2014, 17:12:17 »

Dft have published a spreadsheet listing the vehicles owned by the different operators that have been built or refurbished to modern accessibility standards.
Which operator is conspicuous by their absence ? That's right FGW (First Great Western) ! Why ? Because there are no vehicles listed older than a Class 168 !! Which just goes to show how many 158's 150's 153's and 143's are still trundling around our neck of the woods. I would love to travel on something newer than a 158 !
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2014, 19:40:49 »

Hmmmm. I have mixed views on this.

FGW (First Great Western) have gone some way to make modifications to their fleet to make them accessible. But alot more could or needs to be done for fully get there.

The HST (High Speed Train) for example has an Accessible DDA» (Disability Discrimination Act - about) Compliant Toilet in Coach C with 2x Wheelchair Spaces. Some Coach C's have a smaller toilet which may not fully comply. But it's better than nothing. The Sleeper Stock even has a Disabled Toilet in Seated Accommodation (Coach B)

Yet if you're travelling First Class, you can park your Wheelchair in Coach L but if you want the toilet then... Errr... Yeah... OK.

This made the papers not long ago as a Lady was "Forced to crawl to use the toilet in Coach L" whilst I sympathise to a degree, FGW offered travel on another service at no additional cost. I doubt FGW did that also to spite someone. If your DDA Compliant Set goes out of service. What are you going to do? Cancel it for everyone and p1ss off 500+ Passengers. Or provide a different set and p1ss 3 or 4 passengers off? I'm sorry to say it. But you'd p1ss of the 3 or 4 passengers every time... Harsh but true... Lips sealed (And having a Disability I can see it from both sides. FGW could do no right in that situation IMHO (in my humble opinion))

The Sleeper does not have a Disabled Toilet or Fully Accessible Berth in Sleeping Accomodation. Yet FGW's sister company, First ScotRail does have such luxuries. I reckon the Sleeper is often overlooked here. A little used service in terms of Rolling Stock with just 1 or 2 workings per day. Yet carries a Disabled Toilet in seated accommodation; compared to Class 15x Units working multiple diagrams per day with just a wheelchair stabling space!!

That being said, FGW will accept assistance dogs in Berths for no extra charge and no advance notice is required. Yet ScotRail has been reported to require advance notice for assistance dogs in Berths. In my opinion that is disgusting but I this may well now have changed, as ScotRail took alot of hostile 'complaints' over this.



FGW Class 15x units all have a Wheelchair Space, But that is about it. The Class 158 has a Disabled Toilet, however it is nowhere near compliant in my opinion. To make that facility compliant however I suspect would financially be a total non-starter. The Exterior door would need to move and I can't see FGW doing this. Unless of course they put the Accessible toilet on the opposite side, But this opens up a massive redesign of the Class 158.

My opinion on this is that if it was possible, FGW may have done this during the refurbishment. As the legislation was always going to become compulsory.

Again that all being said. Northern have refitted their Class 150 with very spacious Disabled Accessible Toilets which is seen as welcome in my opinion. The toilets working or not is an entirely different subject however. Also Evershot have redesigned a Class 321 which does carry a fully compliant Disabled Toilet.

So I can't see that FGW would turn around and say "Making all trains on our fleet fully accessible is not possible" because it's clear from current tried and tested projects that it IS possible.

For heavens sake there is even a Mk2 (Mark 2 coach) BSO (Brake Standard Open (carriage)) running around with a Disabled Lavvy in it which FGW were using on CDF» (Cardiff - next trains) - TAU» (Taunton - next trains) runs a couple of years back Roll Eyes

(Cardiff Central - Taunton)



Only thing however I think FGW are missing out on by putting the wheelchair space in Coach C? What if that person wants to go to the Buffet for some water or a cup of tea?? Kind of unfair in my opinion Lips sealed
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2014, 00:01:49 »

The only FGW (First Great Western) trains that are currently compliant with the PRM (Persons with Reduced Mobility) TSI regulations are the class 180s. Nothing else in the fleet complies.

But that's changing.

The Turbo and Sprinter overhauls which are about to happen will include all required mods (including toilets) to bring them in to line with the PRM TSI requirements. 

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are expected to be retired by the 31/12/19 deadline so won't have these modifications.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2014, 06:49:28 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are expected to be retired by the 31/12/19 deadline so won't have these modifications.

What will be running to Devon and Cornwall then?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2014, 07:36:05 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are expected to be retired by the 31/12/19 deadline so won't have these modifications.

What will be running to Devon and Cornwall then?

I think NSE (Network South East) should have said - HST were all expected to have been replaced ..

When the final IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) programme was announced there were no longer covering trains to Devon & Cornwall.  So only that point did FGW (First Great Western) have any reason to start thinking about what to do about HSTs
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2014, 09:52:26 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are expected to be retired by the 31/12/19 deadline so won't have these modifications.

What will be running to Devon and Cornwall then?
There are still several options for Devon and Cornwall; life-extending HSTs, a follow on order for more IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) or Class 222s displaced from the Midland Main Line when it is electrified.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2014, 19:29:06 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are expected to be retired by the 31/12/19 deadline so won't have these modifications.

What will be running to Devon and Cornwall then?
There are still several options for Devon and Cornwall; life-extending HSTs, a follow on order for more IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) or Class 222s displaced from the Midland Main Line when it is electrified.
The recent franchise consultation included a map with 1tph to Plymouth labeled 'HST' where almost everything else was labeled either 9-car 'electric' or 5-car 'bi-mode' IEP. HST is of course a rather generic term, but I assume they mean IC125s since they are often refered to as HSTs.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page