Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
22:27 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 23:39:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[96] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[59] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[53] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[38] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CIS Information Error  (Read 7928 times)
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« on: May 07, 2014, 19:07:50 »

Interesting CIS (Customer Information System) fault which crops up every day I think at Pangbourne and I presume Didcot, Cholsey, Goring and Tilehurst as well. Train involved is 2P34, 0849 from Pangbourne - Padd. Screen always shows it as 6 coaches, but it's always 3 (or 2 occasionally).  I think fault arises because it joins 2R15 at Reading and THEN runs as 6 car to Padd. 

This morning previous train 0834 ex Pangbourne was cancelled (it was retimed to run fast Dicot -Rdg because of late running), and so there were were 2 trainloads waiting for 0849.  0849 was shown as 6 coaches on the CIS and everyone spaced themselves out along the platform accordingly (the regular 0834 passengers would not be aware of the CIS fault on the 0849).  In runs just 2 coaches. Lots of even crosser passengers ......
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2014, 09:33:05 »

Interesting, the 07:38 from Goring was also cancelled yesterday, so two full loads were crammed into that darn 180 that turns up at 07:59.

This morning the 3 car 07:38 was reduced to 2 cars too.

Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1264


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2014, 09:38:06 »

Common on the Cotswold Line too: trains show up as 6 coaches on the display, when in fact it's a three-coach Turbo that will join with another at Oxford. Curiously the Digital Doris announcement gets it right...
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10168



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2014, 10:46:59 »

Heard the same announcement at Newton Abbot at Easter on two successive days concerning a late afternoon train.  The screens and the announcement described the service to Exmouth as a four coach train.  The annoucement then exhorted people travelling to Exmouth to travel in the front four coaches as the rear four would be detached at Exeter St Davids and terminate!  Huh
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2014, 12:13:15 »

Interesting, the 07:38 from Goring was also cancelled yesterday, so two full loads were crammed into that darn 180 that turns up at 07:59.

This morning the 3 car 07:38 was reduced to 2 cars too.


That service will no longer be a 180 from the new timetable. Unfortunately I expect it will just be a 3-car Turbo instead.
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2014, 12:15:28 »

Heard the same announcement at Newton Abbot at Easter on two successive days concerning a late afternoon train.  The screens and the announcement described the service to Exmouth as a four coach train.  The annoucement then exhorted people travelling to Exmouth to travel in the front four coaches as the rear four would be detached at Exeter St Davids and terminate!  Huh
The CIS (Customer Information System) does seem to get itself in to an awful muddle with trains which change length on route. That announcement was along the right lines. There is an afternoon train to Exmouth which divides at Exeter St Davids. However it is the front 2 carriages which terminate at Exeter and the rear 4 which continue to Exmouth. Information on services dividing en route has only recently been added to the CIS. In general I'd say it's a good thing that it's been added, but it obviously needs a little more work to ensure it's correct.
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2014, 20:57:23 »

Interesting, the 07:38 from Goring was also cancelled yesterday, so two full loads were crammed into that darn 180 that turns up at 07:59.
That service will no longer be a 180 from the new timetable. Unfortunately I expect it will just be a 3-car Turbo instead.

Unfortunately ? That's great news! The 180's whilst nice enough, are just totally unsuitable for that service. Now we just need the FGW (First Great Western) rule of no bikes on the Paddington turbos before 09:30 enforced and we might be getting somewhere  Cheesy
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2014, 21:16:28 »

I agree a Turbo is much more suited to that service, I wasn't sure if a 3-car unit would be sufficient though. The 0517 Paddington-Oxford stopping service will also go over to a far more suitable Turbo.
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10168



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2014, 21:24:55 »

Where will the 180 be deployed instead?
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2014, 21:26:18 »

An additional service; 0734 Didcot Parkway-London Paddington.
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2014, 09:17:59 »

I agree a Turbo is much more suited to that service, I wasn't sure if a 3-car unit would be sufficient though. The 0517 Paddington-Oxford stopping service will also go over to a far more suitable Turbo.

Ah Smiley Sorry misunderstood. Well certainly up to Maidenhead a 3 car will be "ok", unless the 07:38 is cancelled, as then there are a LOT of passengers waiting at Pangbourne, Tilehurst, (Reading isn't too bad), and Twyford - so its usually solid by Maidenhead.

To be honest, having the 07:38 and 07:59 as 4 carriages would be perfect - 3 is often a squeeze, especially if anything happens to the earlier trains, where as 5 would be overkill.

That said, that is only up to Maidenhead, I have no idea how bad they are after, I just know there are always a lot of people waiting to get on at Maidenhead - on both of those services.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page