Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:26:35 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: A 142 unit got to Cornwall - here is an alternative use  (Read 14650 times)
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2008, 21:28:22 »

Network rail wouldn't let the 142s go beyond Warminster towards Salisbury .

And none of the traincrews are trained on them either .

At the moment!

Network Rail Southern are a lot more Organised than Network Rail Great Western, NR» (Network Rail - home page) Southern WON (Weekly Operating Notice )'T Let ANGLE GRINDERS (142s) on their lines.

Could point out that NR Southern enforce Safety Issues better than NR GW (Great Western).
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2008, 21:37:32 »

Got that in writing? has a 143 ever made it to Southampton? Jim? Wink
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2008, 21:40:04 »

They aren't allowed as they can somehow touch the 3 rd and go ZAPP

142s aren't that bad really, just could do with a refurb!
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2008, 15:34:38 »

Got that in writing? has a 143 ever made it to Southampton? Jim? Wink


Nope, sadly. If it did go, I would think twice before doing it!
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2008, 17:38:37 »

With repect to Vacman and others who seem to think 142's are alright for Cornwall.

Do you know what a VMFL (Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters) is (or was)?

Traveling around on 142's on the Devon Braches and it may seem that things are ok, however sound waves travel in straight lines, audible engine and track noise inside a Carriage is only a fraction of the sound heard by persons standing trackside.

Indeed even with all the windows open on a 142 the majority of sound heard inside is reflected sound.

What sounds like a gentle Squeal inside a 142 as it passes over points sounds like someones murdering pigs, the whole sty full to track workers.

Noise indicates track damage and wheel damage, I remember seeing Iron Fillings on the sleepers on bends in Cornwall when 142 were last around, not dull rusty ones but bright new fillings indicating that everywheel was acting like an Angle Grinder.

I remember that a Brand New wheel set on one 142 lasted less than 1500 miles (think it managed 1150 miles) before being worn down to Scrapping size when working in Cornwall.

Worked out what VMFL is yet?

In a last desperate bid to save face after the Fanfare launch of Skippers (142's) BR (British Rail(ways)) fitted VMFL* but this just cause bigger problems with other rolling stock as grease got everywhere causing SDAP's to occur to other trains.

*VFML Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters.

Keep 142 East of Totnes!
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2008, 17:54:53 »

With repect to Vacman and others who seem to think 142's are alright for Cornwall.

Do you know what a VMFL (Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters) is (or was)?

Traveling around on 142's on the Devon Braches and it may seem that things are ok, however sound waves travel in straight lines, audible engine and track noise inside a Carriage is only a fraction of the sound heard by persons standing trackside.

Indeed even with all the windows open on a 142 the majority of sound heard inside is reflected sound.

What sounds like a gentle Squeal inside a 142 as it passes over points sounds like someones murdering pigs, the whole sty full to track workers.

Noise indicates track damage and wheel damage, I remember seeing Iron Fillings on the sleepers on bends in Cornwall when 142 were last around, not dull rusty ones but bright new fillings indicating that everywheel was acting like an Angle Grinder.

I remember that a Brand New wheel set on one 142 lasted less than 1500 miles (think it managed 1150 miles) before being worn down to Scrapping size when working in Cornwall.

Worked out what VMFL is yet?

In a last desperate bid to save face after the Fanfare launch of Skippers (142's) BR (British Rail(ways)) fitted VMFL* but this just cause bigger problems with other rolling stock as grease got everywhere causing SDAP's to occur to other trains.

*VFML Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters.

Keep 142 East of Totnes!

Do you really have that much spare time on your hands to find petty little reasons to complain about 142's? Get another job,  I hear a little known train company called First Great Western need some more train crew!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2008, 18:31:50 »

With repect to Vacman and others who seem to think 142's are alright for Cornwall.

Do you know what a VMFL (Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters) is (or was)?

Traveling around on 142's on the Devon Braches and it may seem that things are ok, however sound waves travel in straight lines, audible engine and track noise inside a Carriage is only a fraction of the sound heard by persons standing trackside.

Indeed even with all the windows open on a 142 the majority of sound heard inside is reflected sound.

What sounds like a gentle Squeal inside a 142 as it passes over points sounds like someones murdering pigs, the whole sty full to track workers.

Noise indicates track damage and wheel damage, I remember seeing Iron Fillings on the sleepers on bends in Cornwall when 142 were last around, not dull rusty ones but bright new fillings indicating that everywheel was acting like an Angle Grinder.

I remember that a Brand New wheel set on one 142 lasted less than 1500 miles (think it managed 1150 miles) before being worn down to Scrapping size when working in Cornwall.

Worked out what VMFL is yet?

In a last desperate bid to save face after the Fanfare launch of Skippers (142's) BR (British Rail(ways)) fitted VMFL* but this just cause bigger problems with other rolling stock as grease got everywhere causing SDAP's to occur to other trains.

*VFML Vehicle Mounted Flange Lubricaters.

Keep 142 East of Totnes!

Do you really have that much spare time on your hands to find petty little reasons to complain about 142's? Get another job,  I hear a little known train company called First Great Western need some more train crew!

With respect I would say a Unit needing NEW Wheel Sets after less than ONE WEEKS work is hardly Petty.

It takes an empty HST (High Speed Train) a minimum 1hour 20minutes to cover the 80 miles from Pymouth to Penzance (non stop).
Why so long?

The LOW line speed, why a LOW line speed, the Sharp bends in Cornwall, (and as a by the way, branch line bends are even worse).

When the Railway where built, many on low budgets followed River Valley's, like in Wales with easement's made to the sharper bends.

In Cornwall Rivers flow North or South (in Very General terms) to the Coast whilst the Main Line Cuts though East to West hence there are some very winding parts to the Main Line.

Something People also forgot about Fixed Wheel stock Like 142s, is that being on Single Axles they have a much greater chance of Flange mounting Rail Head than bogie stock, and whilst the 2nd axle of a Bogie is very likely to rerail the other Axle before problems get worse that doesn't happen on railbuses.

The Victorians did away with 4 wheel passenger stock about 1855 (well stopped building it), foolish to bring it back, now had the 142 been 6 wheelers it would be different.

PS The Cardiff Valleys must have shallower bends than Cornwall as VMFL are not required on the South Wales fleet.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2008, 18:36:46 »

The Fal branch would be fine for 142/143's along with the St Ives, where do you think these trains have been for the last 20 years? the moon? (probably the best place for them admittedly), no, they've strangely enough being working trains all across the north of England. no we don't want these units down here BUT if it means more trains and more capacity then i'm up for it! Oh, as for smokey working for FGW (First Great Western)?? He wouldn't last 5 minutes in a passenger facing role!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2008, 18:44:20 »

Keep 142 East of Totnes!

When did Plymouth become part of Cornwall? Or is Plymouth simply too special for these delightful rust buckets?
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2008, 18:55:25 »

The Fal branch would be fine for 142/143's along with the St Ives, where do you think these trains have been for the last 20 years? the moon? (probably the best place for them admittedly), no, they've strangely enough being working trains all across the north of England. no we don't want these units down here BUT if it means more trains and more capacity then i'm up for it! Oh, as for smokey working for FGW (First Great Western)?? He wouldn't last 5 minutes in a passenger facing role!

Might surprise Vacman that I've worked in a Customer Facing Role for many years without trouble, the only trouble was when I went to the assitance of a young Lady having problems with a drunk boyfriend who was to free with his punches, and as the Lady Backed up her boyfriend later, I ended up in Jail, only thing as other witnesses backed me up I was totally discharged.

And as for 142, 143, 144, they should never have been built, and whilst FGW are using 142's then I hope they do try to keep then from operating West from Newton Abbot because Track damage Will occur on the Devon Main Line to PLymouth.
Last time I looked 142 were banned from Looe and Gunnislake, able to reach Bere Alston.
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2008, 19:00:54 »

Keep 142 East of Totnes!

When did Plymouth become part of Cornwall? Or is Plymouth simply too special for these delightful rust buckets?

Plymouth has always been considered part of Cornwall, Railway wise, remember before the Joint Devon and Cornwall Railcard, Plymouth was in both Devons and Cornwall's Railcard areas. Bit like holding Joint Nationality Passports from 2 Countrys.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 08, 2008, 19:05:11 »

The Fal branch would be fine for 142/143's along with the St Ives, where do you think these trains have been for the last 20 years? the moon? (probably the best place for them admittedly), no, they've strangely enough being working trains all across the north of England. no we don't want these units down here BUT if it means more trains and more capacity then i'm up for it! Oh, as for smokey working for FGW (First Great Western)?? He wouldn't last 5 minutes in a passenger facing role!

Might surprise Vacman that I've worked in a Customer Facing Role for many years without trouble, the only trouble was when I went to the assitance of a young Lady having problems with a drunk boyfriend who was to free with his punches, and as the Lady Backed up her boyfriend later, I ended up in Jail, only thing as other witnesses backed me up I was totally discharged.

And as for 142, 143, 144, they should never have been built, and whilst FGW are using 142's then I hope they do try to keep then from operating West from Newton Abbot because Track damage Will occur on the Devon Main Line to PLymouth.
Last time I looked 142 were banned from Looe and Gunnislake, able to reach Bere Alston.
You want to look at the sectional appendix, 14x unit's aren't banned from any part of Cornwall, they are restricted to a max of 15mph between Bere Alston and Gunni.
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 08, 2008, 19:07:22 »

I was commenting on you complaining about the noise being reflected inwards than anything else
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 08, 2008, 19:10:36 »

The Fal branch would be fine for 142/143's along with the St Ives, where do you think these trains have been for the last 20 years? the moon? (probably the best place for them admittedly), no, they've strangely enough being working trains all across the north of England. no we don't want these units down here BUT if it means more trains and more capacity then i'm up for it! Oh, as for smokey working for FGW (First Great Western)?? He wouldn't last 5 minutes in a passenger facing role!

Might surprise Vacman that I've worked in a Customer Facing Role for many years without trouble, the only trouble was when I went to the assitance of a young Lady having problems with a drunk boyfriend who was to free with his punches, and as the Lady Backed up her boyfriend later, I ended up in Jail, only thing as other witnesses backed me up I was totally discharged.

And as for 142, 143, 144, they should never have been built, and whilst FGW are using 142's then I hope they do try to keep then from operating West from Newton Abbot because Track damage Will occur on the Devon Main Line to PLymouth.
Last time I looked 142 were banned from Looe and Gunnislake, able to reach Bere Alston.

If the 14xs weren't built many lines in this country would have had to close. 14xs are cheap and saved many rural lines!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 08, 2008, 19:17:30 »

I was commenting on you complaining about the noise being reflected inwards than anything else

Might not have written that very well, but trains are a lot noiser Trackside than inside the Vehicle even with the Windows open.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page