Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
16:52 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:00 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:55 Penzance to London Paddington
18:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
20:15 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 20:20:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[94] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[66] Taplow-Hassocks
[57] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[56] Stop orders as cover for cancelled services
[50] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[49] Photography at Saltash
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Print  
Author Topic: RMT to ballot for industrial action.  (Read 27071 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: April 26, 2014, 15:00:24 »

Another point mentioned above - that is presumably intended to cloud the current situation, is that this dispute is about ticket office closures, and therefore hypothetical issues or problems with 'automated trains' are a red herring.  Indeed haven't LU themselves said that even if trains are fully automated they will still be manned, as per DLR (Docklands Light Railway)?

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: April 26, 2014, 16:00:08 »

Indeed haven't LU themselves said that even if trains are fully automated they will still be manned, as per DLR (Docklands Light Railway)?

Paul

Yes, but I suspect they won't be paying 50k pa for someone not to drive a train.
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: April 26, 2014, 17:01:06 »



Yes, but I suspect they won't be paying 50k pa for someone not to drive a train.
A couple of years ago, the salary for a PSA on the DLR (Docklands Light Railway) was ^35,550. I expect it will be more now.

Of course nobody gets paid anything for going on strike.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: April 26, 2014, 23:56:41 »



Yes, but I suspect they won't be paying 50k pa for someone not to drive a train.
A couple of years ago, the salary for a PSA on the DLR (Docklands Light Railway) was ^35,550. I expect it will be more now.

Of course nobody gets paid anything for going on strike.

A PSA as of 01/01/14 gets paid ^38,542.00 pa, based on a 35 Hour week and 31 days Annual Leave. Source LRD.

Did anyone notice Kings Cross got an enforcement notice served on it by London Fire?

http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/notice_detail.asp?id=183434. Apparently a manager was photographed padlocking a fire exit (Pentonville Road) and then covering up the fire exit sign with duct tape, allegedly.  (My source is very reliable).
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #49 on: April 27, 2014, 00:17:37 »

Did anyone notice Kings Cross got an enforcement notice served on it by London Fire?

http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/notice_detail.asp?id=183434. Apparently a manager was photographed padlocking a fire exit (Pentonville Road) and then covering up the fire exit sign with duct tape, allegedly.  (My source is very reliable).

That, if true, is somewhat concerning. At Kings Cross St Pancras Underground of all places.  Shocked
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: April 27, 2014, 19:30:49 »

A few responses:

*ALL the stations will be manned during operation times
*ALL trains will be manned

London is the main part of the UK (United Kingdom) economy, rightly or wrongly. The strike in London will therefore affect the entire UK economy.
I know that the Heathrow Express will be running. I just find it funny that they think it will disrupt anyone!

For some time now, anybody getting a job on the railway as a driver/guard must know that automation and DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) is inevitable in the long term.
I think it is scandalous that SWT (South West Trains) pay thousands for "non commercial guards" who only operate doors (which the driver could easily do) and who do not check tickets.
Also, paying an LU operator to press "go" the same rate of a driver is unacceptable.

If we are going to have a viable railway that can afford to expand, the enormous costs need to be brought down.
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: April 27, 2014, 19:42:40 »

I think it is scandalous that SWT (South West Trains) pay thousands for "non commercial guards" who only operate doors (which the driver could easily do) and who do not check tickets.
As someone who regularly uses, and therefore pays, for these services I don't agree with you at all. They provide a useful customer service role ordinarily and a far more important role when there is disruption, or potentially an emergency. Remember that on the latest figures SWT was one of only two TOCs (Train Operating Company) that made a net profit for the government once direct government grant to Network Rail was taken into account. If it was such a scandal that SWT employ non-commercial guards surely SWT would not be profitable.
Logged
tom m
Full Member
***
Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: April 27, 2014, 22:02:55 »

Its worth noting that hex often operates as a double train without interconnected cabs, the onboard staff are present to help evacuate the rear train should it be required as the driver does not have access to the rear train without stepping onto the trackside. This is one of the items under dispute with RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) and hex.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: April 27, 2014, 22:07:10 »

RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) does a very good job at projecting its view to the public and the railway operators by and large are less good.  I think the last few posts illustrate that all these issues are considerably more complex than either side makes out publically.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: April 27, 2014, 22:46:03 »

A few responses:

*ALL the stations will be manned during operation times
.......

Really?? Okay why dont you pop down to one of my local (Non Zone 1) stations and find the member of staff.. Oh wait that's right you can't because there isnt anyone there. Same thing happened today (Sunday) barriers in the open setting and the supervisors office blind pulled down with the lights turned off.

Yesterday (Saturday), travelling again from another local station around Lunch time, passenger fell over and quite badly sprained ankle on stairs. No staff. Luckily for the passenger I was able to call LU NoC. LU NoC confirmed that there was no one at the station (nor at the stations before and after) and could the passenger (with the sprained ankle) travel to the nearest major interchange.

So of course all stations are manned during operation times, clearly.

Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #55 on: May 14, 2014, 08:59:21 »

Quote
the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)^s Executive Committee has accepted all of our proposals outlined in our letter of Monday 21 April 2014 for resolving our dispute with the trade union. The RMT have also confirmed that they no longer consider themselves to be in dispute with First Great Western.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19576



View Profile Email
« Reply #56 on: May 14, 2014, 10:00:58 »

More detail, from the Socialist Worker:

Quote
First Great Western forced to end zero hours contracts

Workers in the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) union have forced concessions from First Great Western train bosses. They are to end zero hours contracts and pay a living wage to agency and contract staff working in catering and cleaning.

This comes after workers voted by almost 60 percent to strike and over 70 percent for action short of a strike.

For the first time the RMT balloted all grades on First Great Western. The dispute ended after a resolution was also reached over disciplinary procedures.

The new wage rates are to be set as outsourced contracts are renewed or expire over the next year.

On board catering workers are to be brought back in-house. RMT said it is still fighting for all agency and contract workers to be brought in-house.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #57 on: May 14, 2014, 10:47:11 »

Hmm, FGW (First Great Western) think slightly differently

Quote
We have committed to consider our position on the payment of Living Wage/ London Living Wage when any contract falls due for re-tendering and have already committed to agree payment of these rates as part of our new contract which has been awarded for train catering provision, which will become effective from Sunday 1 June 2014.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: May 16, 2014, 02:43:57 »

and now there is an issue with TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. In a railway context, the legislation that protects rail staff when a franchise changes hands.) transfers at Reading and Bristol TM (Train Manager, or Ticket Machine, or Temple Meads (Bristol), depending on context).
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13340


View Profile Email
« Reply #59 on: May 16, 2014, 09:08:21 »

Presumably a NR» (Network Rail - home page) uissue though, rather than effecting FGW (First Great Western)?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page