Interesting that HS2▸ is all about capacity now. Why hasn't it been renamed and downgraded engineering wise to say, 140mph if 'High Speed' is no longer the reason?
The reason for building the line is capacity. The question should be if you are building a new line is there a business case for making it high speed?
As for capacity on the WCML▸ . Have you taken a Pendolino (three an hour x11 coaches remember) to Manchester or Birmingham at any time other than between 1630 and 1900. Plenty of fresh air being carted around and using up valuable paths that could be better put to serving semi-fast services on the southern end of the WCML.
That is all very well but what if the people who want to use the southern end of the WCML want to use it in the morning and evening peaks?
There's a lot of bluster and unsubstantiated earnings figures coming from the pro-HS2 camp as well.
I am afraid our media and all the
PR▸ consultants on both sides don't believe our brains could handle all that information if they gave it to us.