Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:15 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
- US lays out plans to hit Chinese ships with port fees
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:52 Par to Newquay
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 02:34:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 67
  Print  
Author Topic: Weather disruption caused in 2014, and how to prevent it happening again - ongoing discussion  (Read 480514 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #660 on: February 24, 2014, 12:38:42 »

Chris, advise is at

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=13574.msg149332#msg149332
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #661 on: February 24, 2014, 12:51:58 »

But I don't get one to tell me the 07:30 from Paddington to Penzance only goes as far as Bristol.

I'm getting concerned about this too. I need to go from DID (Didcot Parkway) to TAU» (Taunton - next trains) on Saturday & would generally caqtch this train. It's still being shown in the planning system as running booked route through to PNZ, both today, tomorrow & Saturday!

They need to run an additional via Berks & Hants at least as far as EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains) for those needing to be at stations TAU and southwards by 1000....

Looks as though the updates are only in online systems until 28th.
The 0730 seems to be running to BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) with a coach connection to TAU arr 1010.
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #662 on: February 24, 2014, 13:53:47 »

Somerset Levels Flooding - 3 Weeks on from my last trip: http://youtu.be/BmXiEljqveU

It's abundantly clear why the line had to be closed for flooding. In areas the water is still rather close to the track for my liking.
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #663 on: February 25, 2014, 09:28:30 »

Looking out of the window this morning on the 0721 Taplow - Reading, still seems to be an awful lot of water on the UR, in the cess and around the signal cabinets between Maidenhead and Twyford, is this likely to have an effect taking into account the fix that has been put in place?
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 646


View Profile
« Reply #664 on: February 25, 2014, 13:23:38 »

Looking out of the window this morning on the 0721 Taplow - Reading, still seems to be an awful lot of water on the UR, in the cess and around the signal cabinets between Maidenhead and Twyford, is this likely to have an effect taking into account the fix that has been put in place?

Looks like it might well be having an effect as FGW (First Great Western) have just tweeted "Safety checks are being made at Maidenhead delaying some trains by up to 30 mins between Reading and Paddington. Engineers on site" and looking at Realtime Trains it would appear that this delay is only affecting trains on the UR.
Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #665 on: February 25, 2014, 14:02:15 »

The FGW (First Great Western) website is confusing. It says services to Worcester/Hereford are "green" ie normal whereas the fast services between London and Reading are "red". Since all services to the Cotswold Line, and indeed South Wales, Bristol and Cheltenham, need to run fast between Paddington and Reading, seems there's inconsistency.

My daughter is planning to come back from London at the weekend and she'd normally travel to Kingham; on the other hand I have to go to Coventry on business on Friday so I could arrange my schedule so as to meet her off a Chiltern service at Banbury (admittedly quicker train journey but not as convenient for me).

So have Network Rail fixed the signalling around Maidenhead or have they not? Clarity of information would be good.
Logged
insider
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 156


View Profile
« Reply #666 on: February 25, 2014, 14:33:28 »

The FGW (First Great Western) website is confusing. It says services to Worcester/Hereford are "green" ie normal whereas the fast services between London and Reading are "red". Since all services to the Cotswold Line, and indeed South Wales, Bristol and Cheltenham, need to run fast between Paddington and Reading, seems there's inconsistency.

My daughter is planning to come back from London at the weekend and she'd normally travel to Kingham; on the other hand I have to go to Coventry on business on Friday so I could arrange my schedule so as to meet her off a Chiltern service at Banbury (admittedly quicker train journey but not as convenient for me).

So have Network Rail fixed the signalling around Maidenhead or have they not? Clarity of information would be good.

From a passengers point of view normal working has been resumed between Reading & Paddington. From a operational point of view....the main lines are normal working, the relief lines have two signals disconnected in both directions, and the signals either side form one extended section and are controlled by axel counters, which have been installed to get around the broken track circuit equipment and flooding issues.

On a side note (as of yesterday 18:00) Turbos are restricted to 80mph and HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))'s & 180's to 20 MPH due to the flood water standing in the four foot (between the running rails).

The problem reported earlier on the FGW website was a brief failure of the UP Relief Lines axle counters, which meant trains reverted to being talked by signals...this has now been reset and the axle counter is working correctly again.
Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #667 on: February 25, 2014, 14:52:17 »

Thanks for this - now understand what's going on. Any timetable for resumption of normal services between Paddington and Reading?

Still find it slightly odd though that FGW (First Great Western) can say there's a major issue between Paddington and Reading without acknowledging there could be a knock on effect to other services.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19549



View Profile Email
« Reply #668 on: February 25, 2014, 23:43:32 »

In areas the water is still rather close to the track for my liking.

And you being a trout ... !  Shocked Roll Eyes Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 646


View Profile
« Reply #669 on: February 26, 2014, 08:18:03 »

This morning's 0654 from Twyford sailed through the affected area on the UR at normal speed. However FGW (First Great Western) and NR» (Network Rail - home page) have each just tweeted about "signalling problems between Twyford and Maidenhead". Looking at Realtime Trains it looks like there are currently delays in the area of up to 20 minutes on the UR and 10 minutes on the UM but none on the two Down lines.
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #670 on: February 26, 2014, 13:18:15 »

This morning's 0654 from Twyford sailed through the affected area on the UR at normal speed. However FGW (First Great Western) and NR» (Network Rail - home page) have each just tweeted about "signalling problems between Twyford and Maidenhead". Looking at Realtime Trains it looks like there are currently delays in the area of up to 20 minutes on the UR and 10 minutes on the UM but none on the two Down lines.


Traversed the Down Main at pretty much line speed on a HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) this morning.  Went up to London yesterday on a 180 on the Up Main and didn't notice any significant slowing between Twyford and Maidenhead.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #671 on: February 26, 2014, 14:20:36 »

Yellow warning of Snow in the South East 0005 - 1200 Friday.....:-o
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #672 on: February 26, 2014, 18:36:29 »

There was report in the 6 p.m. BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) news on the reconstruction at Dawlish, and they have some more pictures on their website here.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #673 on: February 26, 2014, 21:07:59 »

This morning at Maidenhead was not good.. platform swapping, mis-information.. delayed trains..people getting on and off on again trains as the information was wrong... It really isn't totally better yet
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 646


View Profile
« Reply #674 on: February 26, 2014, 21:53:45 »

This morning at Maidenhead was not good.. platform swapping, mis-information.. delayed trains..people getting on and off on again trains as the information was wrong... It really isn't totally better yet

Plus tonight's events didn't help - signal failures at Acton and Twyford and a person taken ill on a train at Iver. I had yet another near two-hour journey home.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 67
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page