Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:35 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
- US lays out plans to hit Chinese ships with port fees
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:52 Par to Newquay
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 02:42:08 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 67
  Print  
Author Topic: Weather disruption caused in 2014, and how to prevent it happening again - ongoing discussion  (Read 480646 times)
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #480 on: February 14, 2014, 22:45:52 »

1C92 18:03 Paddington to Exeter SD has struck a tree shortly after departure from Castle Cary. Train has been damaged - fitter on route. 1C92 120 minutes late.
1A96 19:54 Exeter SD to Paddington also delayed 43 late Castle Cary.
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5674



View Profile
« Reply #481 on: February 14, 2014, 22:51:32 »

.......and on the same Cornwall Railway Society site this ongoing diary of events at Dawlish: http://www.cornwallrailwaysociety.org.uk/a-dawlish-diary.html

I wonder how those containers are standing up to the storm tonight.  Its the worse winds down in the Far West since the 1987 storm (and I thought that was bad enough) Shocked Cry

Early reports on another website state that the temporary sea defences of shipping containers at Dawlish have been breached. Can not give a source but will presumably soon be confirmed or denied on publicly available news sources.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #482 on: February 14, 2014, 23:00:31 »

.......and on the same Cornwall Railway Society site this ongoing diary of events at Dawlish: http://www.cornwallrailwaysociety.org.uk/a-dawlish-diary.html

I wonder how those containers are standing up to the storm tonight.  Its the worse winds down in the Far West since the 1987 storm (and I thought that was bad enough) Shocked Cry

Early reports on another website state that the temporary sea defences of shipping containers at Dawlish have been breached. Can not give a source but will presumably soon be confirmed or denied on publicly available news sources.

Given the situation in Penzance nothing would surprise me. My thoughts with the householders behind the line (and the NR» (Network Rail - home page) staff tomorrow).
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10234



View Profile
« Reply #483 on: February 14, 2014, 23:02:06 »

1C92 18:03 Paddington to Exeter SD has struck a tree shortly after departure from Castle Cary. Train has been damaged - fitter on route. 1C92 120 minutes late.
1A96 19:54 Exeter SD to Paddington also delayed 43 late Castle Cary.


Reported at least one window of Coach F of the 18:03 damaged/broken.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #484 on: February 14, 2014, 23:34:21 »

Looking on Tyrell. I think its prob easier to say what IS running considering all the CSL 2 Code blacks and reds.
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #485 on: February 14, 2014, 23:36:14 »

Maidenhead-Marlow and Exeter-Exmouth lines both closed due to fallen trees. Also a fallen tree between Dorchester West and Weymouth.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #486 on: February 15, 2014, 04:27:01 »

As of 4am this morning there will be no trains between Plymouth and Penzance, including all Cornish branches and the Gunnislake line, due to poor weather conditions. There is no replacement road transport. This is likely to remain the case until daylight inspections of the infrastructure have been carried out by Network Rail. Estimate of the resumption of services is 1200 noon.

In Devon, the Exmouth branch remains closed due to a fallen tree, and Newton Abbot - Paignton is closed due to flooding. Again, due to poor weather conditions there is no replacement road transport for the start of service this morning.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #487 on: February 15, 2014, 07:14:22 »

In the interest of completing the public transport picture, National Express are reporting

Quote
Update: All our services are currently running, for the latest real-time service updates please follow @nxupdates on Twitter. We've also added extra services in the South West to help with the rail disruption.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1110


View Profile
« Reply #488 on: February 15, 2014, 08:42:22 »

IF Network Rail do decide to completely close the line for two weeks then FGW (First Great Western) could use the Reading works diversions via Banbury for Bristol/South Wales services and WoE services into Waterloo. I admit not easy to do during normal weekday running competing for track space with Chiltern and SWT (South West Trains) but neither will busing thousands of passengers between Reading and Paddington.

The total closure of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) I would suggest will not happen, there would have to be a major increase in threat, the wrath of the Home Sec and all the other local MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context)'s including Dave from West Oxfordshire would know no bounds not to mention that of the passengers.

More likely are early shut downs in the evening and a late starts in the morning and weekends to allow Network Rail to move assets, some of the track has already been raise according to insider.

What may happen is the re-signalling to Thames Valley Regional Control Centre and abolition of Slough PSB (Power Signal Box) might get accelerated or even just extending the Didcot area East pasted the affected area, even this will take several months

I agree - the closure of the GWML would cause utter chaos, the M4 has been even more horrendous over the last few days, it would never be allowed.......would it?  Shocked

The line isnt closing.  Network Rail will temporarily remove the defective signals and this Sunday they will make the affected sections one long 50 mph section.  This reduces the capacity of the route but will allow 40% of the timetable to run.  Trains will therefore not have to stop at Red signals and get instructions from the signaller.  This is a new system of working called 'Extended Temporary Block Working'
It will take 8 weeks t completely repair the signalling system.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #489 on: February 15, 2014, 09:51:37 »

IF Network Rail do decide to completely close the line for two weeks then FGW (First Great Western) could use the Reading works diversions via Banbury for Bristol/South Wales services and WoE services into Waterloo. I admit not easy to do during normal weekday running competing for track space with Chiltern and SWT (South West Trains) but neither will busing thousands of passengers between Reading and Paddington.

The total closure of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) I would suggest will not happen, there would have to be a major increase in threat, the wrath of the Home Sec and all the other local MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context)'s including Dave from West Oxfordshire would know no bounds not to mention that of the passengers.

More likely are early shut downs in the evening and a late starts in the morning and weekends to allow Network Rail to move assets, some of the track has already been raise according to insider.

What may happen is the re-signalling to Thames Valley Regional Control Centre and abolition of Slough PSB (Power Signal Box) might get accelerated or even just extending the Didcot area East pasted the affected area, even this will take several months

I agree - the closure of the GWML would cause utter chaos, the M4 has been even more horrendous over the last few days, it would never be allowed.......would it?  Shocked

The line isnt closing.  Network Rail will temporarily remove the defective signals and this Sunday they will make the affected sections one long 50 mph section.  This reduces the capacity of the route but will allow 40% of the timetable to run.  Trains will therefore not have to stop at Red signals and get instructions from the signaller.  This is a new system of working called 'Extended Temporary Block Working'
It will take 8 weeks t completely repair the signalling system.

Sounds like a good plan, and 40% is better than the current 20% I guess? Let's hope it all works  Smiley
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #490 on: February 15, 2014, 10:46:44 »

Sometimes, I think that FGW (First Great Western) Journey Check can be misleading due to the manner of posting incidents.      Today, as an example, it states that trains may be cancelled or delayed between Plymouth and Penzance and carrying on into the detail reports that the route is closed (or similar wording).    This is just an one example as it occurs all the time.   So, if a line is closed, how can a train be delayed if there aren't any. 
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #491 on: February 15, 2014, 10:51:20 »

Sometimes, I think that FGW (First Great Western) Journey Check can be misleading due to the manner of posting incidents.      Today, as an example, it states that trains may be cancelled or delayed between Plymouth and Penzance and carrying on into the detail reports that the route is closed (or similar wording).    This is just an one example as it occurs all the time.   So, if a line is closed, how can a train be delayed if there aren't any. 

The world or railway politics I am afraid.  The TOC (Train Operating Company) will present their train as available to run if Network Rail cannot provide the time tabled slot as far a the TOC is concerned its delayed until Network Rail say cancel it at which stage the TOC gets compensation from Network Rail if the TOC cancels it they still have to pay for the train path.

Privatisation was meant to make things cheaper to operate  Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #492 on: February 15, 2014, 11:12:19 »

Completely off topic but just touching on what Electric Train has said.

Take my favourite Roll Eyes train, the 23:20 Bristol Temple Meads - Frome. Once the train terminates at Frome, It runs Empty Coaching Stock back to Westbury to be cleaned etc.

Now assuming I am the only passenger on this service (not that uncommon) the train runs to Frome. So that's often a 3+ Carriage Train (sometimes 7 or Cool, 1 Driver and 1 Guard just to take thetrout back to Frome Grin Shocked

Now lets assume everyone has gotten off at or before Westbury and the train is now empty... What happens? FGW (First Great Western) run the empty train to Frome, terminate it and conclude with the empty coaching stock manoeuvre back to Westbury Angry Roll Eyes

Why? Because if the service is terminated at Westbury, that's classed as a Cancellation in the eyes of Network Rail and FGW get invoiced for the cancellation of the service... Roll Eyes

So what about the waste of fuel, wear on the tracks/points, wear and tear on the trains themselves etc etc...

I wonder how many other niche services like this exist just to save on the cancellation fees instead of using common sense and saving fuel, wear & tear on the track and trains... Roll Eyes Undecided Lips sealed
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #493 on: February 15, 2014, 11:27:17 »

.......and on the same Cornwall Railway Society site this ongoing diary of events at Dawlish: http://www.cornwallrailwaysociety.org.uk/a-dawlish-diary.html

I wonder how those containers are standing up to the storm tonight.  Its the worse winds down in the Far West since the 1987 storm (and I thought that was bad enough) Shocked Cry

Early reports on another website state that the temporary sea defences of shipping containers at Dawlish have been breached. Can not give a source but will presumably soon be confirmed or denied on publicly available news sources.

There are images on Rail Forum that strongly suggest the wall has been breached beyond the containers at the Down end. Also on Network Rail's site. You can see a track panel suspended in the air. The containers themselves look battered but have held.
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #494 on: February 15, 2014, 12:01:23 »

[url]http://www.networkrail.co.uk/timetables-and-travel/storm-damage/dawlish/[url]
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 67
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page