After the shambolic "service" offered by FGW▸ today, I find it difficult to criticise any other TOCs▸ , clearly they were never going to be able to run anything like the service promised, exactly the same as Dec 27th 2012 as I recall?
To be totally fair to FGW they did get off to a good start, I was at Maidenhead this morning for 07:40 they had the trains on the departure boards unfortunately it was a
NR» engineering overrun that caused them grief, FGW did have a unit failure on the Redhill service that did case that line a few issues early on.
Short interview with Robin Gisby on
bbc website (you need to scroll down towards the bottom of the page) in which he addressed many of the issues raised by TaplowGreen. It would appear it is not just a few trees to clear, but checking for landslips in areas of flooding.
Checking stability of earth structure (embankments and cuttings) is much more difficult than a brick or concrete structure, it does need daylight and is not just a quick look. I know that where a bridge over a river has been subject to flood flows this will also need checking for stability as foundations get eroded and there have been many cases of bridges collapsing as a result. If southeast was where there was most new flooding was then I can appreciate it might take more time than elsewhere.
I am also reminded of similar criticisms in St Jude's storm. On the continent a railway administration did not take this action and was criticised as thousands of passengers were trapped on trains.
There was that infamous bridge collapse at Feltham in November 2009
http://www.londonreconnections.com/2009/in-pictures-the-feltham-bridge-collapse/ this is why NR are cautious, you cannot expect staff to inspect bridges over a swollen river or stream in the dark