These are both Gannet papers using the Newsquest site, and the story appears to be on all of them. Since it's been tagged as "national" and "entertainment" news, it's not going to vary from one title to another.
What is unclear is why it got tagged like that. Most items on that list are credited as copyright PA▸ , but this one has no source at all - so presumably it's from one of their own staff.
This is weird - I though that post of mine explained everything. Maybe it wasn't clear enough. Or got filed in some parallel universe where only I can see it...
If you go and look at the Newsquest web site at
http://www.newsquest.co.uk/portfolio/our-titles/, you can see for yourselves what's going on.
Pick any title via its regional menus, then find the
/national/showbiz/ menu - or the menu names may be different, such as
leisure or
entertainment, as the surface of the web sites is customised.
That Duncan Haimes piece is there on all of them. One of the economies of scale of today's big local newspaper groups is in handling this kind of national news content, which can be done centrally (though there may be a way of adding local pieces).
Obviously this piece should never have been put on the national "showbiz" list, but having made that mistake it appears on the sites of all papers in the Newsquest group (itself owned by the bigger Gannet group of papers). I don't suppose any of them would put it in their print editions.
All the other items I could see on this menu were credited as
^ Press Association 2013 - this had no attribution, so presumably it belongs to the Newsquest group (and is covered by their blanket copyright claim).
And it's still there, so this content is obviously not closely monitored by Newsquest. I wonder how many of the local titles have been contacted to ask or tell them about it? Perhaps these days people only do that on line. The on-line comments are of course separate for each title, and you would have thought someone on one of them would have twigged by now.