I'm struggling to understand the constraints at either end of Filton Bank. Presumably the works at BEJ will give more routing options and flexibility, but what about the other end? I feel S&TE may have explained all this (possibly more than once) but I've just spent half an hour staring at the track diagrams and I'm not the wiser, and not much better informed...
Can anyone help?
Ask away RS. I'll try to explain it if I can! Don't forget that when (i.e. if) the new Henbury turnback terminal station ever gets built, that the current FAW terminator trains will probably terminate there instead.
Thanks, S&TE. Unfortunately I can only phrase this rather vaguely, but here are the problems as I understand them:
1. There's a lack of paths from the northbound (up?) reliefs from FIT to
BPW» since the Dec 2019 timetable. Because of this, cross-city trains which used to terminate at BPW now terminate at FIT. According to our contact in
GWR▸ , this is entirely down to timetabling - but it seems to me that timetables reflect capacity, and the increased number of
SWML▸ IETs▸ is clearly using a chunk of that.
2. From May 2020, it looks like
some BTH» -
GCR» trains will make calls at LWH and SRD - which is an improvement (though not much for people at PSN and BMT who used to have direct trains).
Will Bristol East help?
I have heard a suggestion (from someone whose opinion I value) that the decision to only build platforms on the reliefs has made the scheme less flexible than it needs to be, and that more crossing points between Bristol East and Parkway would help in terms of recovery and flexibility.
Is there something awry (
S&T▸ /
S&C▸ -wise) at the BPW end?
What's your view?