Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5451
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #960 on: November 21, 2018, 20:37:05 » |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHvUarwTlck - in case anyone doesn't know what they're on about!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
DaveHarries
|
|
« Reply #961 on: November 21, 2018, 23:53:38 » |
|
I'm surprised that you're surprised! A train on the Up Filton Main can only go via FIT P2, there are no points offering any other choice*. SandTE's pictures show P2 as bidirectional, and from what he has said P1 is signalled for trains to leave in the Up direction after reversing but not to enter from the Up Filton Main.
When you pointed out previously that the WTT▸ was still showing paths and platforms for the old track arrangement, I didn't twig that would include ones that are now physically impossible. But they are all still there - most northbound trains for south Wales are shown using P3, and none using P4. OK, one can understand that if it makes sense not to update the WTT (leaving aside why that might be). But what flummoxes me a bit is that RTT» and OTT▸ both show yesterday's 2U12 as actually using P3 (i.e. in bold or as "as booked").
*Strictly there is a crossover to P1, not signalled as noted above, and in any case why would you want to if you're going to south Wales? I am surprised because, although I knew that P3 would no longer be used for Cardiff-bound trains I thought that the new P4 was to replace that so I hadn't been expecting P2 to be facilitated for Cardiff services too. Dave
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Louis94
|
|
« Reply #962 on: November 22, 2018, 10:05:16 » |
|
When you pointed out previously that the WTT▸ was still showing paths and platforms for the old track arrangement, I didn't twig that would include ones that are now physically impossible. But they are all still there - most northbound trains for south Wales are shown using P3, and none using P4. OK, one can understand that if it makes sense not to update the WTT (leaving aside why that might be). But what flummoxes me a bit is that RTT» and OTT▸ both show yesterday's 2U12 as actually using P3 (i.e. in bold or as "as booked").
At present whenever a train uses Platform 2 to go towards Cardiff, the signals it steps through are the same as what would be stepped through for Platform 3 previously. This results in incorrect reporting that the train is using Platform 3. It looks like Network Rail need to update their data (SMART) and the background data just needs a slight tweak on RTT to remove this incorrect platform report.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #963 on: November 22, 2018, 10:43:44 » |
|
When you pointed out previously that the WTT▸ was still showing paths and platforms for the old track arrangement, I didn't twig that would include ones that are now physically impossible. But they are all still there - most northbound trains for south Wales are shown using P3, and none using P4. OK, one can understand that if it makes sense not to update the WTT (leaving aside why that might be). But what flummoxes me a bit is that RTT» and OTT▸ both show yesterday's 2U12 as actually using P3 (i.e. in bold or as "as booked").
At present whenever a train uses Platform 2 to go towards Cardiff, the signals it steps through are the same as what would be stepped through for Platform 3 previously. This results in incorrect reporting that the train is using Platform 3. It looks like Network Rail need to update their data (SMART) and the background data just needs a slight tweak on RTT to remove this incorrect platform report. Only a few trains show that (including some goods), but looking closer I can see that all the ones reported as using P4 also used the reliefs (and so get shown on RTT with a platform number). That's what I was saying in my earlier post - that in order to get enough use out of P3&4 at FIT, most trains to/from Wales have to use the reliefs even if not stopping.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #964 on: November 22, 2018, 10:45:44 » |
|
I am surprised because, although I knew that P3 would no longer be used for Cardiff-bound trains I thought that the new P4 was to replace that so I hadn't been expecting P2 to be facilitated for Cardiff services too.
Dave
I'm wondering if they've still been overriding ARS▸ this week looking at some of the train movements, which is why some Cardiff bound trains have been run into P2 instead of P4 There's been several instances of PMH- CDF» / TAU» -CDF services being run up the main lines to avoid delayed services on the reliefs, the same as there's been delayed XC▸ services being run into P1 at the last minute at BPW» to prevent holding up on-time PAD» services, and then run into P2 at all other times if they're on time / not holding up other services
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
WelshBluebird
|
|
« Reply #965 on: November 22, 2018, 11:22:33 » |
|
Already saw a slight benefit this morning with the Severn Beach line train I was on running 5 minutes late towards Temple Meads. In the past this would have held up the Great Malvern to Weymouth train that normally runs 7 or so minutes behind, but is usually delayed if that Severn Beach train is running late. Today it used the new main's, meaning it arrived into Temple Meads just after I did (rather than 5 minutes or so later), and so my connection was a nice walk over from P1 to P7, onto the train, then leaving a minute later, no waits needed! Of course, I know at some point (probably sooner rather than later!) this will inconvenience rather than help me as I can no longer rely on the Weymouth service always being behind us as long as we hit Narroways first, but it is nice to see the reliability improvements so obviously this soon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5451
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #966 on: November 22, 2018, 11:29:36 » |
|
It seems to me that delays are still very much a thing on the Severn Beach line... staring at TrackIt, many of these seem to originate at Bristol East...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #967 on: November 22, 2018, 11:39:39 » |
|
It seems to me that delays are still very much a thing on the Severn Beach line... staring at TrackIt, many of these seem to originate at Bristol East...
I noticed a lot of Beach line delays yesterday on TrackIt too One of the biggest problems then seemed to be BRI» bound services waiting at CFN▸ for the AVN / SVB services to arrive so they could crossover before the single line stretch to Narroways In one case then, and again this morning, the BRI bound service departed to prevent it running any later leaving the CFN bound service stuck at SRD for ages til the single line was cleared (and another PMH- CDF» service was redirected up the main line) Am guessing before that there's no way they'd allow that to happen and they'd hold the other train at CFN to clear the Up lines, but now with the opportunity to bypass trains held at LWH & SRD they've started doing that?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
SandTEngineer
|
|
« Reply #968 on: November 22, 2018, 11:42:50 » |
|
It seems to me that delays are still very much a thing on the Severn Beach line... staring at TrackIt, many of these seem to originate at Bristol East...
I think the regulation problems have now shifted to Bristol East Junction (well aren't we supprised). Its not the best of layouts and needs to be the next target for rearrangement (think it was going to happen pre-electrification; so who knows when now ).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dispatch Box
|
|
« Reply #969 on: November 22, 2018, 11:52:21 » |
|
I'm surprised that you're surprised! A train on the Up Filton Main can only go via FIT P2, there are no points offering any other choice*. SandTE's pictures show P2 as bidirectional, and from what he has said P1 is signalled for trains to leave in the Up direction after reversing but not to enter from the Up Filton Main.
When you pointed out previously that the WTT▸ was still showing paths and platforms for the old track arrangement, I didn't twig that would include ones that are now physically impossible. But they are all still there - most northbound trains for south Wales are shown using P3, and none using P4. OK, one can understand that if it makes sense not to update the WTT (leaving aside why that might be). But what flummoxes me a bit is that RTT» and OTT▸ both show yesterday's 2U12 as actually using P3 (i.e. in bold or as "as booked").
*Strictly there is a crossover to P1, not signalled as noted above, and in any case why would you want to if you're going to south Wales? I am surprised because, although I knew that P3 would no longer be used for Cardiff-bound trains I thought that the new P4 was to replace that so I hadn't been expecting P2 to be facilitated for Cardiff services too. Dave I Thought there was a position 1 Junction Indicator just before platform 2 to allow trains into p2 then on to Cardiff. I suppose the platform 2 route for Wales trains is incase one breaks down on the relief.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 22, 2018, 20:33:55 by Dispatch Box »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #970 on: November 22, 2018, 11:59:20 » |
|
I think the regulation problems have now shifted to Bristol East Junction (well aren't we supprised). Its not the best of layouts and needs to be the next target for rearrangement (think it was going to happen pre-electrification; so who knows when now ). As with everything, you remove one bottleneck and it highlights another... I can see the single line between Narroways and CFN▸ also becoming an issue as time goes on, especially as one of the benefits of four tracking was to enable more stopping services at both SRD and LWH
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
WelshBluebird
|
|
« Reply #971 on: November 22, 2018, 12:10:35 » |
|
Are there any plans to add platforms to the new main lines at Stapleton Road and Lawrence hill / is there enough room with the new track layout to do so in the future if it becomes necessary / desired?
Also totally agree about the single track on the Beach line. It is already a problem anyway, but hopefully with removing one source of delays and adding the ability to keep units at Stapleton Road or Lawrence hill whilst they wait for a Bristol bound train to pass the junction we have a little wiggle room.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5451
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #972 on: November 22, 2018, 13:19:10 » |
|
...
In one case then, and again this morning, the BRI» bound service departed to prevent it running any later leaving the CFN▸ bound service stuck at SRD for ages til the single line was cleared (and another PMH-CDF» service was redirected up the main line)
Am guessing before that there's no way they'd allow that to happen and they'd hold the other train at CFN to clear the Up lines, but now with the opportunity to bypass trains held at LWH & SRD they've started doing that?
That does sound likely, doesn't it? For BRI-bound passengers that would be seen as an advantage of the new arrangement; I wonder what the time-penalty was for the CFN-bound passengers? Are there any plans to add platforms to the new main lines at Stapleton Road and Lawrence hill / is there enough room with the new track layout to do so in the future if it becomes necessary / desired?
No. And although the four-tracking project made passive provision for a four-platform station at Ashley Down, the costings and developed scheme for this are for a two-platform station here too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #973 on: November 22, 2018, 13:46:53 » |
|
That does sound likely, doesn't it? For BRI» -bound passengers that would be seen as an advantage of the new arrangement; I wonder what the time-penalty was for the CFN▸ -bound passengers?
It's a benefit for now with the existing timetable, but with the desire to get more stopping services that would definitely become an issue I'm assuming that either the half hourly departures from PWY on the CDF» - TAU» / CDF-PMH harbour will be amended at some point in the future to stop at LWH & SRD, along with the new Ashley Hill station when it opens Plus the hourly BPW» -WSM which calls at both stations on it's return from WSM but not on the way there At the moment there's no daytime trains at all between PWY & LWH/SRD, and one an hour (sometimes once every two hours) from BPW Don't get me wrong, it's been really interesting following all the paths the last couple of days and seeing how the new main lines have allowed the XC▸ / Freight & some CDF services to be run up these freeing up the reliefs, but a lot more thought will be needed to accomodate all of the planned additional local services without adding extra delays on existing ones
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5451
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #974 on: November 22, 2018, 13:58:08 » |
|
Meanwhile, at Filton Abbey Wood: Nice day for taking a couple of pics, thought I.
First one shows a Cardiff-bound GWR▸ service on Platform 4, whilst an inbound Manchester-Temple Meads Cross Country service passes through; Second shows a Cardiff-Portsmouth Harbour train pulling in to Platform 3; Third is looking south off the bridge into the low hazy sun.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
|