That's the interesting thing about a poll for me - I always want to add qualifications and ask questions.
I couldn't agree with you more ... and yet at the same time I'm looking to ask questions that are of real relevance and use in their outcome and not to [ask/consult] for the sake of it. So I HUGELY appreciate the added value of the responses. They help me move from formulating how I should react to various options and suggestions as to what do support for the TransWilts station where we're anticipating there would be the highest proportional traffic growth as / when /
if the TransWilts service starts ... to being able to give background and reason to back up the view.
In the early days of a new TransWilts service, quick growth would be anticipated in traffic between Westbury / Trowbridge and Chippenham / Swindon, where the populations are to a great extent already rail-aware, and indeed commuter trains into Bath are (over)crowded and with traffic still growing, in part by people with this traffic. Bradford-on-Avon people are happy with the relief it will provide, although the capacity released will - I'm sure - be re-used again very quickly. But then there will be growth - slower to happen as it represents a modal change for many - from Melksham. In the
LSTF▸ bid, journeys per day from the stations in the north and west of Wiltshire per head of population were quotes, and it was noticeable that Melksham's figure was dramatically low compared to any others. If it were to rise to - say - just two thirds of the otherwise lowest figure, you've got quite a crowd and you need to take a look at how you will get them away from the station.
Melksham station isn't town centre. It's in the top left of a map, near to some significant densely packed,and some older, housing. So there's immediately walking traffic there. It's just off the A350 (bypass) and A365 roads, so immensely driveable without the need to pick through suburban roads or a town centre. However, there is also significant housing at the bottom and right - and much new housing going in there; that's my "just over a mile and a half"...
The bus choices I offered you are not fictitious, though neither are most of them real yet.
* Public bus services pass the top of the station approach (and stop about 300 yards away!) in a pattern that's clearly not designed to connect with the proposed train times (how could they?)
* There's a statement in the LSTF document concerning extending the town bus to start earlier, finish later and serve the station to connect with trains
* An alternative suggestion was made of a demand responsive bus, which read as being bus that runs if it's booked, through I'm not sure how far ahead that would need to be done
* And the final possibility again uses the town bus, but specifically has it run from the station 10 minutes after the train actually arrives, to a single town centre stop then a loop around the right and bottom with limited stops - one for each neighbourhood. You'll note I'm guaranteeing the bus to wait; because the station is in the middle of a long single track section, the limited stop loop route followed by a run around the bypass will get it back to the station for the next train
which will also be late if the previous one was and they're closely scheduled.