Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:55 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:31 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
06:51 Reading to Redhill
07:20 London Paddington to Oxford
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
06:52 Newbury to London Paddington
06:57 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
07:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:05 London Paddington to Newbury
08:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 07:56:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[94] Thumpers for Dummies
[71] Railcard Prices going up
[58] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[50] Outstanding server / web site issues
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[46] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: ^8M Train Depot still far from Completion  (Read 7866 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« on: December 19, 2007, 11:23:43 »

An update on the progress or should that be lack of progress on the new servicing depot for FGW (First Great Western)'s 'West' fleet:

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144913&command=displayContent&sourceNode=231190&home=yes&more_nodeId1=144922&contentPK=19303057
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2007, 11:41:30 »

Archive FGW (First Great Western) link from October 2006.
http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/NewsItem.aspx?id=401
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2007, 12:01:22 »

It probably accounts for a lot of the graffiti that has started to appear on the unit's aswell!
Logged
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2007, 12:02:55 »

Quote
"We noticed the difference with the trains belonging to South West Trains, which operates services from Bristol to London Waterloo and Salisbury. Their trains are immaculate, clean and well maintained because they have a first-class depot in Salisbury.
I'm so glad they put this part Cheesy
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2007, 14:33:52 »

Quote
"We noticed the difference with the trains belonging to South West Trains, which operates services from Bristol to London Waterloo and Salisbury. Their trains are immaculate, clean and well maintained because they have a first-class depot in Salisbury.
I'm so glad they put this part Cheesy
So am I as it goes to show what can be achieved. I only wish that SWT (South West Trains) would take over FGW (First Great Western)'s local services and right now I suspect that FGW wish they would too!
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2007, 15:03:59 »

SWT (South West Trains) are the beez-neez of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s. Cleanest and more than likely the most reliable.
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2007, 17:05:14 »

You mean the award they've run pretty much every year for the past 5 I think ...
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2007, 17:30:01 »

Would be nice if they did the bristol > waterloo services more often (ie hourly) as im sure there are lots of people who'd rather go in a nice comfy 159 than some of the hst's
« Last Edit: December 19, 2007, 20:00:59 by Shazz » Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2007, 19:53:49 »

Would be nice if they did the bristol . waterloo services more often (ie hourly) as im sure there are lots of people who'd rather go in a nice comfy 159 than some of the hst's
That would be good though they need to speed them up a bit to make it a real alternative to FGW (First Great Western) London services.
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2007, 20:07:39 »

Agreed, however the increase from 3 to 4 trains a day is certainly a step in the right direction!
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2007, 22:03:50 »

Would be nice if they did the bristol > waterloo services more often (ie hourly) as im sure there are lots of people who'd rather go in a nice comfy 159 than some of the hst's

Absolutely no chance. SWT (South West Trains) do not have enough units to do this as well as their franchise commitments. At the moment, they have 24 class 159 units required for service every day, and currently 5 158s.

In order to meet franchise commitments, 9 158s will need to be in use, or, more likely 8 and one 158 diagram substituted to 159. So 25 159s and 8 158s. There are 30 159s and in order to have a good maintenance and keep up the work they are doing currently, there is a maintenance requirement of 4 units at any time. Therefore, there is one unit remaining however I believe that using this on additional Bristol services could potentially compound maintenance schedules in disruption, as well as this being the only 'spare'. I'm not sure whether SWT could release another unit without completely ruining their maintenance regime and therefore resulting in awful reliability.
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2007, 22:55:28 »

We can always dream  Tongue
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2007, 23:27:02 »

Yes

I think a more likely proposition would be an hourly Westbury return or I am currently investigating pathing availabilities for a 1tp2h service to Chippenham.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2007, 10:24:04 »

Quote
"We noticed the difference with the trains belonging to South West Trains, which operates services from Bristol to London Waterloo and Salisbury. Their trains are immaculate, clean and well maintained because they have a first-class depot in Salisbury.
I'm so glad they put this part Cheesy

That quote is likely to worry FGW (First Great Western) high command, because it is by David Redgewell of Campaign For Better Transport, a commentator known for giving First Great Western the benefit of the doubt.
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2007, 12:00:01 »

Scotrail seem to keep most of their units in good nick aswell.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page