Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 10 Jan 2025
 
* Three teens arrested over boy's bus station death
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:22 Newquay to Par
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 20:27:32 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[85] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[81] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[72] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
[34] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15
  Print  
Author Topic: Coal, for use on steam hauled heritage railways - merged posts  (Read 57318 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: July 31, 2020, 16:27:46 »

Despite the strongly held views of some locomotive firemen, steam locomotives are not that fussy over the exact type of coal.
Remember that most railway companies back in the day used whatever was affordable in their area, so as to minimise transport.

The main requirements for good locomotive coal are as follows;
In reasonable sized lumps. Small coal tends to fall through the grate and to be wasted. Very large pieces have to be broken up, thereby increasing labour.
Of good calorific value, in order that a tender full will give a good mileage without replenishment.
Not liable to form clinker which sticks to the firebars and impairs proper combustion.

For power station use, size is irrelevant as the coal is ground to powder before combustion. Good calorific value, and limited clinker formation as just as important in a power station as in a loco.

Back in the good old days, loco coal was often screened to remove the small pieces. The rejected "small" could be used on open fires in waiting rooms and offices.
For record breaking attempts, each piece of coal was sometimes hand selected for optimum size.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: July 31, 2020, 17:19:14 »

I recall one of the TV programmes about the olden days, which I think was about the Strawberry Line. There was a chap talking about when he was a small child, when his father was in charge of all things railway at a lightly used station with a level crossing. He used to set up a few old tins as a can shy on a barrel or something at the end of the platform. The coal the crew threw kept them warm at home.
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5456


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: July 31, 2020, 18:38:23 »

Despite the strongly held views of some locomotive firemen, steam locomotives are not that fussy over the exact type of coal.

Whisper that near keepers of the One True Light.

Whilst the locos of lesser roads may be happy to burn lignite, or even peat, GWR (Great Western Railway) locos were designed to run on best Welsh steam coal. Feeding them anything less amounts to cruelty.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #48 on: July 31, 2020, 19:52:12 »

I recall one of the TV programmes about the olden days, which I think was about the Strawberry Line. There was a chap talking about when he was a small child, when his father was in charge of all things railway at a lightly used station with a level crossing. He used to set up a few old tins as a can shy on a barrel or something at the end of the platform. The coal the crew threw kept them warm at home.

Virtually every railway employee who was there in steam days had a tale about coal unofficially coming off engines, be it being given to crossing keepers (usually demolishing the privy or the front door in the process); shouting abuse at the footplate staff causing the fireman to try out his aim, and now this tale of glorified skittles.

If half the tales were true they wouldn’t have had enough coal left for the engines...

And whilst on the tail of tall tales, virtually every clerk in the 60s knew somebody who had devised a plan to save a railway line from the Beeching cuts, only to be told by their manager that “Your job is to close railways, not save them”

If half of those tales were true the BRB(resolve) may as well have packed The Doctor back off to ICI and saved themselves a £24k pa wage bill

Wink



Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #49 on: July 31, 2020, 20:08:41 »


GWR (Great Western Railway) locos were designed to run on best Welsh steam coal. Feeding them anything less amounts to cruelty.


They were originally designed to burn Welsh Steam coal, with that I can agree. Welsh coal was the obvious choice for the GWR because it was virtually on their doorstep.

However.post WW2 it was no longer available, as all the best stuff that was still being dug out at that time was being exported. That is why Sam Ell was charged with carrying out draughting experiments at Swindon in the 1950s which led to a number of modifications to GWR engines to allow them to steam on the rubbish that they were by then being given.

All currently preserved and operational ex-GWR locomotives lived through this process in the 50s. Suffice to say that if you fed a lot of them with Welsh steam coal today they’d be sick...
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: August 02, 2020, 14:02:38 »

I recall one of the TV programmes about the olden days, which I think was about the Strawberry Line. There was a chap talking about when he was a small child, when his father was in charge of all things railway at a lightly used station with a level crossing. He used to set up a few old tins as a can shy on a barrel or something at the end of the platform. The coal the crew threw kept them warm at home.

Virtually every railway employee who was there in steam days had a tale about coal unofficially coming off engines, be it being given to crossing keepers (usually demolishing the privy or the front door in the process); shouting abuse at the footplate staff causing the fireman to try out his aim, and now this tale of glorified skittles.

If half the tales were true they wouldn’t have had enough coal left for the engines...

And whilst on the tail of tall tales, virtually every clerk in the 60s knew somebody who had devised a plan to save a railway line from the Beeching cuts, only to be told by their manager that “Your job is to close railways, not save them”

If half of those tales were true the BRB(resolve) may as well have packed The Doctor back off to ICI and saved themselves a £24k pa wage bill

Wink





I suspect that a lot of the stories about free coal were in fact true.
A loco had a coal capacity of a few tons.
If just 10 kilos was diverted to each of a dozen "customers" on each trip, the effect on total coal usage would be small and unlikely to be noticed.
10 kilos of coal would keep a domestic sized fireplace burning for up to a day. 10 kilos of "free" coal if obtained every day was about three and a half tons a year, ample for many homes.

On a busy route, a lot of homes could get free coal (each footplate crew having their own favourites)
And of course dropping off a bit of coal to a signal box, station waiting room or the like was not even dishonest, the fuel was still being used for railway purposes. Coal dropped from a moving train might of course miss the intended target and be collected by scavengers.
I suspect that the odd privy was demolished, but not that often or the cost of building a new privy would negate the value of the free coal.

And of course some coal was diverted at the depot before it even reached the loco.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: August 02, 2020, 14:45:31 »

From my transporting days it was a common practice to cut out a coal wagon full of coal that had developed a hot box to be cut out of a coal train at Stoke Gifford yard and shunted to the cripples siding and over a matter of days that wagon would empty of its contents. One of my schoolchums residing in Harry Stoke would tell me of how he spent the weekend emptying a coal wagon in the yard behind his home so that the wagon could be repaired. By the way his father was a rail worker and many residents of Harry Stokes never shivered in their homes in winter.

Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: August 02, 2020, 22:29:14 »

Cross-border trains from Northern Ireland to the Republic always had empty tenders/bunkers on their return trip North, during WWII (World War 2 - 1939 to 1945).  This was because the Republic, as a neutral country with no coal of its own, needed every last ounce of coal it could get, and was no longer being supplied by the UK (United Kingdom), which needed the coal for powering the hostilities.

My father, as a schoolboy in Dublin during the war, told me that he made his own candles to provide light to study by, as the electricity supply was so unreliable.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #53 on: August 03, 2020, 02:04:06 »

....  This was because the Republic, as a neutral country with no coal of its own, ....

It may not have been suitable for rail use, but there was some coal mining in Ireland ... from Wikipedia

Quote
Arigna coal mining

The Arigna Coal Mine is famous for its very shallow deposits. Seams of culm were worked by miners lying on their sides to shovel the coal out. Mining lasted until 1990, and the coal was used for iron works and later for a power plant. With the demolition of the ESB Generating Station chimney, the era of collieries in the area ended.

[snip]

In 1958 the Arigna Power Station was opened to produce electricity. It was the first major power generating station in Connacht. The station was built specifically to burn the semi bituminous coal with its high ash content.

and

Quote
The Cavan & Leitrim Railway was a 3 ft (914 mm) narrow gauge railway in the counties of Leitrim and Cavan in northwest Ireland, which ran from 1887 until 1959. Unusually for Ireland, this 3 ft (914 mm) narrow gauge line survived on coal traffic, from the mine at Arigna. It outlived most of the other Irish narrow-gauge lines, giving a further lease of life to some of their redundant engines.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #54 on: February 03, 2021, 18:35:41 »

And remember that for 2022 ... the heritage sector has a different problem ... from Rail Business Daily

Quote
With the end in sight for UK (United Kingdom) coal for UK steam, heritage railways turn their sights overseas for continued supplies of coal.

The UK’s heritage railways have been forced to accept that the battle for continued domestic coal supplies is lost. Stocks from now-closed mines will soon be exhausted. The last mine producing steam coal is scheduled to close.

The Heritage Railway Association (HRA) says in spite of government support for the continued burning of coal by heritage steam operators, policy elsewhere is acting decisively against the opening of new mines. That means UK-produced coal for the nation’s much loved steam railways will run out in early 2022.

“Over the past five years every planning application for a new mine which could have produced the kind of coal we need has been refused,” said Steve Oates, Chief Executive of the HRA. “There are some limited stocks in reserve, and the last producing mine in the UK, Ffos-y-fran in South Wales, will close in early 2022. After that, unless we find an alternative source of supply, heritage railways will be running on coal dust.”
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1681


View Profile Email
« Reply #55 on: February 04, 2021, 10:00:08 »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-55923731
The leading climate scientist James Hansen has warned Boris Johnson that he risks “humiliation“ over plans for a new coal mine in Cumbria.

The UK (United Kingdom) government, which hosts a climate summit this year, has allowed the mine at Whitehaven to go ahead..............

Wrong type of coal?
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: February 04, 2021, 10:54:06 »

Cross-border trains from Northern Ireland to the Republic always had empty tenders/bunkers on their return trip North, during WWII (World War 2 - 1939 to 1945).  This was because the Republic, as a neutral country with no coal of its own, needed every last ounce of coal it could get, and was no longer being supplied by the UK (United Kingdom), which needed the coal for powering the hostilities.

It was not the only fuel, though. Spike Milligan describes how, when the Puckoon Flyer ran out of steam, the driver went off to borrow a bucket of peat. Famously, he stopped for a cup of tea...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-55923731
The leading climate scientist James Hansen has warned Boris Johnson that he risks “humiliation“ over plans for a new coal mine in Cumbria.

The UK government, which hosts a climate summit this year, has allowed the mine at Whitehaven to go ahead..............

Wrong type of coal?

Indeed it is. The mine will provide coking fuel for use in the steel industry. There isn't a viable alternative ingredient at the moment, so the choices are between closing the steelworks and shipping steel across the world, or shipping coal from distant lands, both of which will add to the emissions Mr Hansen is keen to remove. From what I have seen in the planning reports, there will be no opportunity for the heritage rail groups to buy from here. It will have to be Australia or Russia, or find a way of running on battery power.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 10:59:44 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1478


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: February 05, 2021, 08:25:13 »

Not my neck of the woods,but may I ask the approx location of the mine?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #58 on: February 05, 2021, 08:58:14 »

Not my neck of the woods,but may I ask the approx location of the mine?

On the west Cumbrian Coast - Whitehaven / Corcickle / St Bees stations on the nearby railway, which might be a sensible way to get any product out?   The plans are for mine head to be onshore, mining out under the sea. See https://www.westcumbriamining.com/wcm-factsheets/ and pages linked from there. Woodhouse Colliery; address: Whitehaven CA28 9LF
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 09:04:16 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1478


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: February 05, 2021, 09:25:41 »

Thank you Grahame
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page