Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 18, 2013, 21:20:01 » |
|
An interesting comment on that particular press article has been posted on their website, too ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 18, 2013, 22:05:40 » |
|
An interesting comment on that particular press article has been posted on their website, too ... Interesting picture that the Wiltshire Times have used to illustrate the article as well. From April 2009 when the fire brigade were called to Westbury station for a small fire on a West Coast Railways Class 47 hauling a railtour. Perhaps they are subliminally suggesting that this sort of thing won't happen with electric traction.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 19, 2013, 08:38:01 » |
|
If we had a proper rolling electrification programme this wouldn't even be up for debate, first Newbury Bath (including Melksham line). Bristol Plymouth. Westbury Exeter.
Ideally the Melksham Bath should be done in the first phase with the reinstatement of Bradford North Curve to allow work on the mainline.
Basingstoke Exeter and Southampton Salisbury Westbury follow on as night follows day. Especialy as Basingstoke and Southampton are planned to have 25Kv so makes the boundaries easy.
The trouble is we don't have the vision. We are all like Oscar Wilde's cynic, we know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Remember growth follows the wires!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 19, 2013, 09:34:35 » |
|
If we had a proper rolling electrification programme this wouldn't even be up for debate, first Newbury Bath (including Melksham line). Bristol Plymouth. Westbury Exeter.
Ideally the Melksham Bath should be done in the first phase with the reinstatement of Bradford North Curve to allow work on the mainline.
Basingstoke Exeter and Southampton Salisbury Westbury follow on as night follows day. Especialy as Basingstoke and Southampton are planned to have 25Kv so makes the boundaries easy.
The trouble is we don't have the vision. We are all like Oscar Wilde's cynic, we know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Remember growth follows the wires!
However, AIUI▸ no-one has ever defined 'rolling programme' to mean starting at one end of the GW▸ and SW and filling in all the gaps (which were all listed in the Electrification RUS▸ with their relative priorities). As I see things, what they intend is a national rolling programme meaning that they will move onto the next priority job (to keep the same steady state wiring teams and trains working) and that is the Midland mainline ( MML» ). After the MML the next priority might be the XC▸ route from Bristol to Derby. So looked at nationally - maybe there is both vision and the nucleus of a 'rolling programme'. Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kernow Otter
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2013, 21:18:55 » |
|
Anyone care to place bets on when the wires will reach Penzance....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2013, 11:09:25 » |
|
never
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2013, 18:50:34 » |
|
As the wires spread around the country the use of bimode trains will become increasing absurb as large lumps of metal are carted for miles under the wires. Plus the ever aging DMU▸ fleet which no-one will want to replace because of the of the wires the 170s will be getting on in 2030.
So we will either revert to loco haulage with a change of traction at Plymouth or the wires will spread, however I don't think I'll see the wires to Penzance maybe Plymouth.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2013, 21:30:49 » |
|
As the wires spread around the country the use of bimode trains will become increasing absurb as large lumps of metal are carted for miles under the wires. Plus the ever aging DMU▸ fleet which no-one will want to replace because of the of the wires the 170s will be getting on in 2030. The electric IEP▸ 's that Hitachi are building have diesel generator sets, they are there to provide power to the hotel services in the event the 25kV is lost, also the generator is capable of moving the train at 30mph. The mass of a generator is less than that of the batteries required to keep the hotel services running for 3 hours, batteries are hideous environmentally and to maintain more so than a diesel gen set So we will either revert to loco haulage with a change of traction at Plymouth or the wires will spread, however I don't think I'll see the wires to Penzance maybe Plymouth. I think Exeter more than Plymouth the sea wall at Dawlish is still an obstetrical to 25kV not insurmountable just very very expensive
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
Kernow Otter
|
|
« Reply #23 on: June 20, 2013, 22:11:41 » |
|
The electric IEP▸ 's that Hitachi are building have diesel generator sets, they are there to provide power to the hotel services in the event the 25kV is lost, also the generator is capable of moving the train at 30mph. The mass of a generator is less than that of the batteries required to keep the hotel services running for 3 hours, batteries are hideous environmentally and to maintain more so than a diesel gen set
30 mph? hell are we to get fast trains as well then !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #24 on: June 20, 2013, 22:39:21 » |
|
The electric IEP▸ 's that Hitachi are building have diesel generator sets, they are there to provide power to the hotel services in the event the 25kV is lost, also the generator is capable of moving the train at 30mph. The mass of a generator is less than that of the batteries required to keep the hotel services running for 3 hours, batteries are hideous environmentally and to maintain more so than a diesel gen set
30 mph? hell are we to get fast trains as well then ! Yep ....... the bi-mode are 117 mph!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #25 on: June 23, 2013, 15:36:48 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #26 on: June 23, 2013, 17:18:07 » |
|
Cannot see why they fear for their services the electrification to Bedwyn is so the TOC▸ does not have to retain any more 165/6 than is necessary
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
stebbo
|
|
« Reply #27 on: June 23, 2013, 21:06:48 » |
|
Personally, I think this debate is extraordinary. As I've said before (on other posts) I honestly believe that the government should forget the new HS▸ link to the north and get on with expanding the electrification on the existing routes to the SW, Bristol to Birmingham, Hereford to Birmingham and Birmingham to Nottingham.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
onthecushions
|
|
« Reply #28 on: June 23, 2013, 23:39:04 » |
|
The station entrance and exits figures for 2011/12 are (rounded):
Hungerford 278k Bedwyn 107k Pewsey 208k Westbury 425K
It does look odd that wiring beyond Hungerford to Bedwyn is viable but to Pewsey is not.
It's about 30 route miles on from Pewsey to Westbury and a Parkway for Devizes would be a big plus.
Unless there is a big jump in costs going West from Bedwyn (such as an extra feeder station/GSP), it doesn't look very rational.
OTC
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #29 on: June 24, 2013, 06:28:38 » |
|
It does look odd that wiring beyond Hungerford to Bedwyn is viable but to Pewsey is not.
On 19 electric trains each way per day, electrification is justified Newbury to Bedwyn. On 20 electric trains each way Newbury to Bedwyn, with 1 or 2 of them per day extended to Westbury and calling at Pewsey, you cannot justify extension of electrification from Newbury to Westbury. That's what the study has shown. Common sense really; if you electrify a railway line but continue to run diesel trains on most of it with very few exceptions, then you probably won't get a return on your investment. You could get very different results if you looked at extending electrifcation from Newbury to Westbury and running an amended pattern of services. For example, extend the 19 local electric services to Westbury (extended from Bedwyn) and use Bimode IEPs▸ to the South West, switching power source at Westbury.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|