swlines
|
|
« on: December 14, 2007, 20:14:44 » |
|
Seeing as I'm having difficult keeping track with what trains are where, how many 150s/153s/158s does the western division of FGW▸ have, and if possible, what numbers? (for the rolling stock pages on swlines).
Tom
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2007, 20:16:50 » |
|
Lee or Jim maybe able to help you there on this one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2007, 20:24:43 » |
|
I think the 153's are as follows 305,318,329,361,368,369,370,372,373,377,380,382, 318 is supposed to be going to Northern but don't know if it's gone.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2007, 20:54:50 » |
|
I noticed a thread about 153 318 and is it still here. I had the misfortune of using it today. A scruffy red thing and even the passengers were complaining of its condition. It was on the 1244 from PLY» arrived at PZ late and formed the 1450 back to PLY 11' down.
318 is still here as FarWest got on it today.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2007, 21:21:43 » |
|
Got a list :)
Class 142 (12) 142001 142004 142009 142028 142029 142030 142062 142063 142064 142067 142068 142070
004, 028, 062, 067, 070 Short-Leased until October 2008 to cover for refresh program.
Class 143 (8) 143603 143611 143612 143617 143618 143619 143620 143621
Class 150/1 (2) 150121 150127
Class 150/2 (17) 150219 150221 150232 150233 150234 150238 150239 150243 150244 150246 150247 (Refurbished) 150248 150249 150261 150263 150265 150266
Class 153 (12) 153305 153318 153329 153361 153368 153369 153370 153372 153373 153377 153380 153382
Class 158 (21) 158745 158746 158748 (Refurbished) 158749 158750 158760 158761 (Trial Refurbished) 158762 (Refurbished) 158763 158764 158765 158766 158767 158768 158769 158771 158776 158778 158798 (3-car)
|
|
« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 16:25:49 by Conner »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mookiemoo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2007, 23:51:18 » |
|
Why does no one ever comment on the 165/166 units
I know they may seem like manna fro heaven for those using 142s but on a three hour journey?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2007, 23:53:14 » |
|
Because the fleet doesn't shuffle around more than a pack of cards?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dog box
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2007, 07:47:21 » |
|
Why does no one ever comment on the 165/166 units
I know they may seem like manna fro heaven for those using 142s but on a three hour journey?
Sorry but most of the stuff down west is far better than a tinny turbo....class 150 any day
|
|
|
Logged
|
All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2007, 15:15:42 » |
|
I have to say, FGW▸ aren't doing badly. Even if it was a 142:
The 1030 PGN-EXM was 4 car The 1044 PGN-EXD» (new service) was two car.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2007, 15:56:34 » |
|
I have to say, FGW▸ aren't doing badly. Even if it was a 142:
The 1030 PGN-EXM was 4 car The 1044 PGN-EXD» (new service) was two car.
That is the silver lining to the cloud that at lest there's more capacity now with 142's. 158762 was in Cornwall today, has been refurbished different to 761, with different seats and the CCTV▸ has been fitted.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2007, 17:46:20 » |
|
I have to say, FGW▸ aren't doing badly. Even if it was a 142:
The 1030 PGN-EXM was 4 car The 1044 PGN-EXD» (new service) was two car.
That is the silver lining to the cloud that at lest there's more capacity now with 142's. 158762 was in Cornwall today, has been refurbished different to 761, with different seats and the CCTV▸ has been fitted. Yeh, I was lucky enough to get on it. The seats aren't that comfortable, i thought.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2007, 17:51:36 » |
|
Must be better than a refurb'd HST▸ though?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2007, 17:53:43 » |
|
Must be better than a refurb'd HST▸ though?
No. They are the kind that offer back support so that means they have bits that poke out. Also a problem with the train in general was that it vibrated alot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2007, 18:14:25 » |
|
Must be better than a refurb'd HST▸ though?
No. They are the kind that offer back support so that means they have bits that poke out. Also a problem with the train in general was that it vibrated alot. All 158's vibrate a lot!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2007, 18:16:49 » |
|
Must be better than a refurb'd HST▸ though?
No. They are the kind that offer back support so that means they have bits that poke out. Also a problem with the train in general was that it vibrated alot. Try a Voyager! Upon stepping off you may be excused for christening it a 'Vomiter'
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|