Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 21 Apr 2025
 
- Passengers evacuate Delta plane after engine fire
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
21st Apr (1958)
Battery Multiple Unit enters public service (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
21:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 London Paddington to Bedwyn
22:58 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:15 London Paddington to Oxford
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
23:22 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:23 Basingstoke to Reading
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
23:34 Reading to Basingstoke
Additional 23:36 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
23:42 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
23:45 Slough to Windsor & Eton Central
23:56 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
22/04/25 00:05 Basingstoke to Reading
Short Run
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
22:00 Hereford to London Paddington
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Delayed
22:45 London Paddington to Port Talbot Parkway
23:07 Oxford to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22/04/25 00:07 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 21, 2025, 23:44:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[88] Firstgroup's rail division trading 'ahead of expectations'
[73] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
[60] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[56] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[53] Yeovil Railway Centre - South chord project
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: First class on Turbos  (Read 8559 times)
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« on: March 30, 2013, 21:33:46 »

I was just wondering if anyone knew how easy or possible it is to distinguish which 3 car turbos only have one 1st class and which have one at either end of the train? And does this happen on two car turbos too (I thought I saw one the other day but we were going quite fast).. Thanks in advance... I am putting this in London to Reading as that is where I saw them  Grin
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2013, 21:36:37 »

If it says 166 on the front, FC (First Class, or Fat Controller, or Football Club, depending on context) at both ends. 165 then just one end.

Looking at the windows too, if they all have openers then its a 165, which means FC at one end only.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2013, 22:23:23 »

Occasionally when a 166 has had long term problems with a middle car the 2 driving cars are coupled, not seen one around for a while, I think the last time was when a car was borrowed to test out the aircon fit
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2013, 22:38:47 »

Thank you.. That makes it easier.. If first class is at the front (on the way into London) it tends to get to get abused a lot more than if it's at the back of a three car train...

Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2013, 23:29:11 »

If you see any tables fitted as well then FC (First Class, or Fat Controller, or Football Club, depending on context) will be located at both ends.
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2013, 12:36:52 »

I did write to FGW (First Great Western) several years ago suggesting it would be a good idea if 165's had a distinguishing mark on the first class ends of the trains (like Voyagers do) so when a train runs into a station first class passengers can see earlier which end the first class is so they could start walking accordingly and thus help reduce station stop times. The yellow bar above the windows is not easy to see when a train runs in.

I got a reply which completely missed the point of what I was saying.  Still, I tried.

By the way, Voyagers have a yellow bar above the coupler at the first class end, and a blue bar at the standard class end.
Logged
readytostart
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 608


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2013, 14:24:59 »

By the way, Voyagers have a yellow bar above the coupler at the first class end, and a blue bar at the standard class end.

The blue vertical bar was initially on both coupler heads and denoted that the Voyager had completed modification after the awarding of the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) franchise to Arriva. On XC Voyagers this meant that the shop had been removed and on WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)) voyagers it meant that the vehicle containing the shop had been modified to contain table seating and moved next to first class to allow use as either a standard or first vehicle.
Logged
James
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 173

Be happy and helpful to all people you meet.


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2013, 00:13:28 »

First class on turbos is a complete waste of space, most people travel standard and in an age of increasing numbers of People standing, it would make sense to have standard class on all turbos. Reasons for this include;
Turbos are designed for Commuter journeys, some journeys are less than 30 minutes, why need it.
Turbos should not be used for journeys over one hour, or 20 minutes if overcrowded. So why do you need it.
The obvious reason is, so first can provide a upper class seating area which gets abused alot and is a small area.
If anyone disagrees fair enough, however i stated my reasons.

Logged

Be smart and help one another, if the other is in need, just common curtisy Wink
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2013, 07:07:40 »

First class on turbos is a complete waste of space....

Not sure this I agree with you ...f you removed the first class facility where would the off duty FGW (First Great Western) staff go to?!

Ok, I will get off of my soap box now!
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10236



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2013, 08:02:51 »

The only time I tend to travel in First on a Turbo is if I am on a First Class Advance ticket and using the train as a connection at the start or end of my journey.

Given that I don't travel that often this observation can only be anecdotal but I think my ticket has only been checked once even when I am at the back of the train and the conductor is just behind the door.

Now if the front of the cab was open like the orignal DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) and you could see the road ahead you could sell tickets for the "observation car".   Grin Grin
Logged
jdw.wor
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 108


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2013, 10:44:03 »

Remember that those of us who live in Worcester and Malvern still have some Turbos with around two and a half hour journies
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2013, 11:19:04 »

First Class always seems to be used by a couple of people on the North Downs line, and tickets are normally checked as well. I've used it a couple of times when using an Advance ticket and connecting at Reading for an HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)), and I've always had my ticket checked.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2013, 22:16:26 »

First class on turbos is a complete waste of space, most people travel standard and in an age of increasing numbers of People standing, it would make sense to have standard class on all turbos. Reasons for this include;
Turbos are designed for Commuter journeys, some journeys are less than 30 minutes, why need it.
Turbos should not be used for journeys over one hour, or 20 minutes if overcrowded. So why do you need it.
The obvious reason is, so first can provide a upper class seating area which gets abused alot and is a small area.
If anyone disagrees fair enough, however i stated my reasons.



Well yes... But if FGW (First Great Western) still sell First Class tickets to Maidenhead passengers.. They need to do something.. Provide a First class service maybe? Or stop charging people extra money for nothing...They won't admit to either I don't think...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page