jane s
|
|
« on: December 12, 2007, 13:22:27 » |
|
Anyone know what the delay this morning was all about?
Dragged myself out of bed for the 07:22 from Tilehurst and ended up freezing on the platform for nearly 1/2-an-hour until it finally arrived at just after 07:45, then we sat at Reading for another 5 minutes before it finally left.
The 07:50 was cancelled altogether.
Anyone know what the problem was?
|
|
« Last Edit: December 12, 2007, 13:45:15 by jane s »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2007, 14:31:13 » |
|
By the sound of things, the new system of dealing with long trains at short platforms has meant that station working is slower than it has been, and so some of the trains from beyond Bristol and fromthe Cotswold line have been getting held up. That probably doesn't directly effect most of the Tilehurst trains, but it does mean that they can get held up behind the other services from Oxford to Didcot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2007, 14:37:11 » |
|
Welcome to the forum, by the way .... and at Reading, I guess you might have been waiting for a "Path" beween those 125 expresses which make FGW▸ most of their money
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 17:40:34 » |
|
It was cancelled from Banbury - Oxford due to a broken down train which might explain the delay.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jane s
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2008, 11:36:40 » |
|
I missed the 07:22 from Tilehurst on Wednesday & today, so caught the 07:43. On both days, the train had an "extra unscheduled" stop at Reading?
Anyone know what this was all about?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ollie
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2008, 22:41:46 » |
|
This morning there were some late runners due to a points problem at Swindon which delayed several trains so your service was made to call additional at Reading, not sure about Wednesday though sorry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gordon the Blue Engine
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2011, 15:31:21 » |
|
Has anyone else noticed that the pre-recorded announcements on Turbos seem to refer to the station between Reading and Pangbourne as "Twilehurst" sounding like "Twyford"?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chineseJohn
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2012, 22:36:44 » |
|
I've heard that Tilehurst Cycle racks/parking are to be removed and a cafe put it there place.
FGW▸ have said that cyclists will not loose out on the parking .. i assume new racks elsewhere in the station complex?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2013, 10:48:50 » |
|
Thanks for posting the links, and welcome to the forum.
Is there a similar application in for Goring's footbridge yet? I wonder whether the opportunity to extend the 'down main' platform will be taken at the same time at Goring, given that it's current usable length is just 69 metres, and if 4-car 20 metre electric trains will be using it that's not long enough without SDO▸ being used.
The case for lifts being installed is a difficult one. There's a similar argument for other stations where footbridges will need to be altered/replaced as part of the scheme, and (as is the case near Oxford) others are, or will be, pushing for disabled access at 'their' bridge, but obviously the cost to each location of providing lifts or ramps eats into the budget.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
DidcotPunter
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2013, 09:01:23 » |
|
Thanks for posting the links, and welcome to the forum.
Is there a similar application in for Goring's footbridge yet? I wonder whether the opportunity to extend the 'down main' platform will be taken at the same time at Goring, given that it's current usable length is just 69 metres, and if 4-car 20 metre electric trains will be using it that's not long enough without SDO▸ being used.
The case for lifts being installed is a difficult one. There's a similar argument for other stations where footbridges will need to be altered/replaced as part of the scheme, and (as is the case near Oxford) others are, or will be, pushing for disabled access at 'their' bridge, but obviously the cost to each location of providing lifts or ramps eats into the budget.
Nothing on the planning application section of South Oxfordshire District Council's website yet so it seems that the plans for replacing the footbridges at Goring and Cholsey have not yet been submitted. Moving further west, I understand that bridge replacement between Didcot and Swindon is scheduled for next year. The A338 bridge at Wantage Road (Grove) is planned for demolition on the weekend of 39/30th March and will take around 6 weeks to reopen. The A417 bridge at Challow is slated for demolition on the weekend of 11/12th October 2014 and will reopen in mid December. I'm not sure about the timing for the other over-bridges on this section but I believe that bridges at Basil Hill Lane (entrance to Foxhall car park, Didcot), Steventon, Shrivenham, Bourton and on the east side of Swindon will be replaced.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2013, 09:29:38 » |
|
Moving further west, I understand that bridge replacement between Didcot and Swindon is scheduled for next year. The A338 bridge at Wantage Road (Grove) is planned for demolition on the weekend of 39/30th March and will take around 6 weeks to reopen. The A417 bridge at Challow is slated for demolition on the weekend of 11/12th October 2014 and will reopen in mid December.
I'm not sure about the timing for the other over-bridges on this section but I believe that bridges at Basil Hill Lane (entrance to Foxhall car park, Didcot), Steventon, Shrivenham, Bourton and on the east side of Swindon will be replaced.
That's going to cause some traffic disruption! The bridge at Wantage Road was built for four tracks, but when the loops were restores it obviously did not quite meet the current requirements so the turnout on one side is just under the bridge. I do hope they make it compatible with full four track formation. Also there are other over-bridges between Didcot and Swindon that are on sections with four track formation, but currently only have two tracks. It would be very short sighted not to renew these bridges as four track structures.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DidcotPunter
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2013, 09:53:16 » |
|
Yes we anticipate traffic chaos! Diverting the local traffic through some of the villages like Denchworth won't be terribly popular either. However I can't think of any alternative.
Good point about allowing for four-tracking though I doubt if it'll happen except at Challow and maybe Wantage Road. I spoke to Richard Turner, Community Relations Advisor - Electrification for Network Rail. He emphasised that their budget for the project was very tight (well, he would wouldn't he) and that the bridges were being replaced on a like-for-like basis. This meant that any improvements - such as road widening, footpath improvements - would have to be funded from elsewhere, such as the local authority. Given this is Oxfordshire, it's unlikely to happen. There's controversy over the replacement of the footbridge in Hinksey at the moment, as Network Rail will only fund a basic replacement, whilst the locals want the replacement enhanced for disabled access. There's a standoff over who funds any enhancements.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2013, 11:03:05 » |
|
I am less worried about footbridges as (a) they are cheaper and (b) they are usually less disruptive to change. At Challow there are four tracks already so there is no problem. It is at Wantage that a slight widening would be in order.
My main concern is the other bridges around Shrivenham that are four track and where there are currently only two.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|