|
swrural
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2013, 16:59:25 » |
|
I'm a bit worried about all this (can't believe it quite). When do we get the backlash after all this rail enthusiasm?
Or is it just the price of petrol that's doing it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
trainer
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2013, 17:21:04 » |
|
It makes a change from all the wretched sport we've had to put up with in the last 12 months. I am making a point of letting the broadcasters know that these programmes are enjoyed, so they have positive feedback when planning future programme ideas.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CLPGMS
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2013, 17:46:34 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
trainer
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2013, 21:54:24 » |
|
Having watched the first programme, I will indeed be contacting to BBC» but sadly with a strong criticism of the shooting style which detracts and distracts from the excellent script. All the out-of-focus, extreme close-ups and camera wobble frustrated me beyond belief. Why so many fuzzy shots through grass, trees and ironmongery? Seems a shame. I was looking forward to this. I'd be interested in other forum members' opinions.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2013, 22:32:12 » |
|
I thought it was an excellent programme, and presented the subject in an informative, and, unusually for modern broadcasting, not in a dumbed down way. I didn't notice the aspects of the filming you mention at all.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chuffed
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2013, 23:26:29 » |
|
I agree with John R. I think we have all become somewhat seduced by the glut of the glamorous Mr Portaloo staying in the best hotels, swanning around Europe and artificially stage managed bits of the UK▸ . This programme did what it said on the tin....the unvarnished truth,i.e 'loco motion' or 'mad movement'. The rushed breathess delivery, the suppressed excitement, the dirt, the water, the brilliant contrasts of light and darkness captured the mania of those ground breaking early years perfectly. Dan Snow brought a refreshing dose of realism to the whole subject by getting down and dirty where it really mattered.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Western Enterprise
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2013, 10:37:10 » |
|
All the out-of-focus, extreme close-ups and camera wobble frustrated me beyond belief. Why so many fuzzy shots through grass, trees and ironmongery?
I have to say I enjoyed it but there did seem to be quite a bit of jumping around history wise. I don^t recall seeing anything about the first railroads in South Wales nor of the ones in Cornwall, but I could be mistaken. What annoyed me most were the repetitive mini-sequences of steaming pistons and miniature rockets running round in sepia. This was just pure ^filler^ to bulk the programme out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trowres
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2013, 17:35:21 » |
|
Did they say where that tunnel with the cable haulage was?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Grecian
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2013, 23:23:17 » |
|
I did like the fact that in tonight's episode talk of Mr Peto taking railway technology to the land across the Atlantic featured a view of the Isle of Wight from Old Harry Rocks in Dorset for no apparent reason. The first time I've ever seen the USA compared to the isle across the Solent.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2013, 07:46:57 » |
|
Is it really the end of the series already? There's so much more to the history of the railways, diesel and electric traction, the (British?) invention of tiliting trains etc.
I thought the shot of Mr Snow standing on top of a moving train was rather silly, obviously he wasn't really on top of one but could it give pepole bad ideas?
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
GBM
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2013, 10:29:27 » |
|
Also standing in the middle of a London terminus walkway? with no reflective or hard hat. Surely 'elf'n's' would 'ave a fit?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Personal opinion only. Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
|
|
|
swrural
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2013, 13:31:58 » |
|
More seriously, he was pictured on the Bluebell railway with a train shooting past him by inches, and (of course) well within the boundary fence and with no high viz clothing.
It's more serious as that is exactly what puts fear into the managers of such lines.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trowres
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2013, 20:58:22 » |
|
I don't think the location was mentioned in the narrative, but it was the 'Victoria Tunnel', that runs for roughly 2 miles NW > SE (Spital Tongues to eastern Quayside) under Newcastle upon Tyne. It was built because a direct wagonway through the built up area was not practical, even 200 years ago. Paul
Belated thanks, Paul. I was way off with my thoughts of the time, the Pwll Du tunnel near Blaenavon in South Wales, which at some time in its life was cable worked. See: http://www.secret-bottletop.com/Pwll-Du/History.html
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|