Why offer advanced ONLY on the train with an unreliable connection?

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 43075

Why offer advanced ONLY on the train with an unreliable connection?

« on: November 20, 2012, 08:39:05 »

It wasn't the first time last night ... delays to the 17:45 off Paddington to Swansea, and the TransWilts connection, which is allowed 8 minutes, misses at Swindon. For passengers to Trowbridge, Westbury and Warminster, this typically results in a late arrival (assuming everything else is on time) of around half an hour. For Dilton Marsh, you're looking at 2 hours, and for Melkskam there's no other connection, and you end up with a taxi or a wait for the late bus.

Question ... why on earth are advanced fares to Melksham ONLY offered on the 17:45? It's a tight change at Swindon which results in frequent missed connections at great expense. Why not offer advanced fares on the 17:30?
*) Much better change - Chippenham (Same Platform) rather than Swindon
*) Much less likely to fail to connect, so saves First on taxi fares
*) Much less stressful for the traveller
*) For people for whom a short journey is critical, there's better fare differentiation. Cheaper is a bit slower (and that's not going to worry people who are price-driven)


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member

stationstop

Jr. Member

Posts: 21

Re: Why offer advanced ONLY on the train with an unreliable connection?

« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2012, 10:39:42 »

Grahame,

It might be possible to do that combination on an earlier train. It's possibily a limitation of the booking software. Have you tried forcing a longer connection time?

Very often this produces results.


	Logged

Trowres

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 806

Re: Why offer advanced ONLY on the train with an unreliable connection?

« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2012, 13:47:30 »

Hmm, on the Nationalrail site, allowing extra interchange time has a minimum half-hour increment, so it puts one on an even earlier train than desired. However, using the "Exclude interchange" option to avoid SWI^» worked (and also showed the alternative route via Westbury).

Whether or not the TOC^▸ booking engines replicate this I haven't the time to check. Sad


	Logged

JayMac

Data Manager
Hero Member

Posts: 19245

Re: Why offer advanced ONLY on the train with an unreliable connection?

« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2012, 15:55:32 »

Using the 'text only' versions of WebTIS booking engines, which now include FGW^▸ 's, allows you to specify 'extended station change times'.

http://tickets.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/gw/en/JourneyPlanning/Wizard/StationSelect

Looking at a specimen journey from Paddington to Melksham on 27th November I was able to get the booking engine to offer me an Advance Purchase fare on the 1730 changing at Chippenham.


	Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »