Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:13 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
16:31 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 16:57 London Paddington to Swindon
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 17:32:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[98] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[87] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[41] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[22] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Thatcham level crossing - ongoing discussion of possible changes and problems  (Read 8805 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« on: August 31, 2012, 11:15:10 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Changes to a Berkshire level crossing could reduce traffic and the amount of time barriers remain closed.

Network Rail and West Berkshire Council are working together on possible improvements to a crossing near Thatcham station.

Preventing trains "overhanging" the crossing - when they stop at the station and keep barriers down for longer - is a primary concern.

A new road layout proposal would also undergo a public consultation.

The potential improvements follow an independent survey carried out by consultants Stuart Michael Associates.

Changes to southbound traffic flows could include introducing a dedicated right turn lane for access to the Royal Mail's sorting office on Station Road.

Councillor Keith Chopping, West Berkshire's Council's highways cabinet member, said: "All the options have been carefully studied and considered. The overhanging work and dedicated right turn are the most immediate, practical and affordable solutions."

The consultants' report added replacing the level crossing with a bridge over the railway line is likely to be out of the question at this time.

A public consultation will formally begin early next year.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2012, 13:23:05 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Changes to a Berkshire level crossing could reduce traffic and the amount of time barriers remain closed.

There's something missing in the BBC's first sentence I think?  Perhaps they meant this:

Changes to a Berkshire level crossing could reduce traffic delays by reducing the amount of time barriers remain closed?

That would be a bit more logical.  I doubt any possible positive changes to a level crossing would ever reduce traffic...   Huh

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2012, 21:56:26 »

There's something missing in the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)'s first sentence I think?  Perhaps they meant this:

Changes to a Berkshire level crossing could reduce traffic delays by reducing the amount of time barriers remain closed?

That would be a bit more logical.  I doubt any possible positive changes to a level crossing would ever reduce traffic...   Huh

Paul

Keeping is shut most of the time would probably have that effect Wink
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2013, 01:02:16 »

From the Newbury Weekly News.

Quote
Drivers trying to cross Thatcham level crossing are facing further disruption this evening (Wednesday) due to a signalling fault.
 
The fault has resulted in the barriers being shut for the second time today.
 
A spokeswoman for Network Rail, Sam Kelly, said that engineers are working on the problem, which is expected to be resolved by 6pm and apologised for the further inconvenience.
 
Police are on the scene directing traffic.
 
This is the second problem to hit the station today after the barriers failed in the down position at 10:55am causing traffic queues on both sides.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2013, 07:06:01 »

From the Newbury Weekly News.

Quote
Drivers trying to cross Thatcham level crossing are facing further disruption this evening (Wednesday) due to a signalling fault.
 
The fault has resulted in the barriers being shut for the second time today.
 
A spokeswoman for Network Rail, Sam Kelly, said that engineers are working on the problem, which is expected to be resolved by 6pm and apologised for the further inconvenience.
 
Police are on the scene directing traffic.
 
This is the second problem to hit the station today after the barriers failed in the down position at 10:55am causing traffic queues on both sides.

I came home on the 1736 from Reading to Thatcham last night and we were only a few minutes late which was good.It looked like there were network rail vans blocking the barriers which were down but there were still cars waiting to cross. Im not sure if they knew something we didnt or they were just being optimistic!

Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2013, 11:29:56 »

Trains were being talked past 2 signals on the Down, and there were delays reported of up to 25minutes.  The 1703 Pad-Penzance was diverted via Swindon/Melksham and did not call at Newbury.  The line was handed back with normal running-ish about the time that BerkshireBugsy would have been travelling.
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2013, 13:06:05 »

Trains were being talked past 2 signals on the Down, and there were delays reported of up to 25minutes.  The 1703 Pad-Penzance was diverted via Swindon/Melksham and did not call at Newbury.  The line was handed back with normal running-ish about the time that BerkshireBugsy would have been travelling.

IMHO (in my humble opinion) the diversion announcements at Reading regarding the Penzance servers were clear and concise, assuming you didn't have your earphones on and just took notice of the train itinary notices in the train windows. on the 1737 I believe we first puilled up outside Midgham and then progressed slowly to Thatcham. A few minutes late but no big deal to me anyway.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page